<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5D Mark II &amp; 24-105 f/4L IS Kit Discontinued?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-24721</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-24721</guid>
		<description>I work for BEST BUY and in our system it shows that this unit both kit and body only are both discontinued</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for BEST BUY and in our system it shows that this unit both kit and body only are both discontinued</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-18673</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-18673</guid>
		<description>...and shot yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and shot yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16342</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16342</guid>
		<description>It is now &quot;Back Ordered&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is now &#8220;Back Ordered&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stealthy Ninja</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16293</link>
		<dc:creator>Stealthy Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16293</guid>
		<description>Medium format?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medium format?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stealthy Ninja</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16292</link>
		<dc:creator>Stealthy Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16292</guid>
		<description>+1

L lenses are suppose to be big and heavy.

Talking about that, someone who understands lens design answer this.

A 24-105 2.8L IS would be similar is size/weight to a 70-200 2.8L IS?! Or actually weigh less and/or be smaller?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
<p>L lenses are suppose to be big and heavy.</p>
<p>Talking about that, someone who understands lens design answer this.</p>
<p>A 24-105 2.8L IS would be similar is size/weight to a 70-200 2.8L IS?! Or actually weigh less and/or be smaller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanozJim</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16290</link>
		<dc:creator>PanozJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16290</guid>
		<description>What is &quot;over FF size&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is &#8220;over FF size&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16275</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16275</guid>
		<description>LULZ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LULZ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16274</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16274</guid>
		<description>winnar!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>winnar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malte</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16227</link>
		<dc:creator>Malte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16227</guid>
		<description>+1

or EF-S haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
<p>or EF-S haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike V</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16169</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16169</guid>
		<description>Harden up.

Who cares how big or heavy it is.

I want a 24-105 f2.8 IS.

If you want small and light, buy a point and shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harden up.</p>
<p>Who cares how big or heavy it is.</p>
<p>I want a 24-105 f2.8 IS.</p>
<p>If you want small and light, buy a point and shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony Sucks Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16091</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony Sucks Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16091</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but Sony sucks. :P

I don&#039;t care how good their cameras get, SONY SUCKS.

LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but Sony sucks. :P</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care how good their cameras get, SONY SUCKS.</p>
<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi Pot</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16088</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi Pot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16088</guid>
		<description>Dave, you post here more than most people I think.  LOL

You probably have the shakes after 5 seconds! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, you post here more than most people I think.  LOL</p>
<p>You probably have the shakes after 5 seconds! :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David, give it a break.</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16087</link>
		<dc:creator>David, give it a break.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16087</guid>
		<description>Dude, give it a break about the APS-H stuff dude. Sheesh!

I know you&#039;re joking, but you&#039;re coming across as obsessive yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, give it a break about the APS-H stuff dude. Sheesh!</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;re joking, but you&#8217;re coming across as obsessive yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funny Joke Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/5d-mark-ii-24-105-f4l-is-kit-discontinued/comment-page-1/#comment-16084</link>
		<dc:creator>Funny Joke Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2305#comment-16084</guid>
		<description>Brought to you by Wikipedia. :P 

ROFLMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brought to you by Wikipedia. :P </p>
<p>ROFLMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.017 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 23:25:06 -->
