Comments on: 7D Crop & Tamron 17-50 VC [CR1]

By: Paul Smith Shoes

Paul Smith Shoes — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:46:26 +0000

Many people have alos become fans of Paul Smith Shoes since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like Paul Smith Wallets and Paul Smith Belts,It designs very good.

By: Rumour Buster

Rumour Buster — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:09:04 +0000

Same old Canon 1.6 FOV, $2100 CDN

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:37:22 +0000

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090105canoneos7d.asp

By: Jack Catastrophe

Jack Catastrophe — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:28:34 +0000

there are indeed too many EF-S’s that start at 15, 17 or 18mm:

18-55 f/3.5-5.6
18-55 f/3.5-5.6 II
18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS
17-85 f/4.5-5.6 IS
17-55 f/2.8 IS
18-200 f/3.5-5.6 IS
and if the rumour is true then also;
15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS
18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS

most boring is that not only there is a considerable focal range overlap among them but also that the great majority of them are f/3.5-5.6 . if the longer ones like 18-200 and 18-135 were possible to design with that maximum aperture, why can’t the shorter ones like 18-55 or 15-85 be f/2.8-4.0 for example?!!! The only fast one is plagued with dust, softness and price-tag problems. Canon keeps on coming up with new designs every know then but fails to ever notice what are the problems with the existing ones, they remind me of a joke that someone whose name was something like “John Catastrophe” kept on changing it to “Jack Catastrophe”, “James Catastrophe” …, without ever realizing where is the problem, funny but tragic in the same time!!

By: Def. bored

Def. bored — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:08:09 +0000

definitely cheaper…

By: fotoray

fotoray — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:37:12 +0000

maybe just the square root of 2 = 1.414…

By: J-Man

J-Man — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:58:45 +0000

I don’t think it’s anything but 1.6

I’d like it to be FF but looks like not this year :(

By: else

else — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:38:09 +0000

You read too much on that DXO site…

By: else

else — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:37:27 +0000

i don’t need hundreds of MP..
I really need 12 good MP. So i would preferred 12MP cleaner sensor with the same tehcnology…becouse they are able to do it.

Man, what is so hard to understand??

By: jbl

jbl — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:30:13 +0000

With the new 15-85 lens, a 1.45 crop seems even more interesting.

However, it’s still not FF and I won’t upgrade to something less than FF.

Also, I don’t believe this rumor, Canon won’t change their APS-C.

By: Goob

Goob — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:26:09 +0000

17-50 is very sharp.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:22:28 +0000

In order to exchange IR with wireless non-optical system canon will need to replace all existing flashes or at least release new versions. It wouldn’t be canon if price for such will not doubled. Take for example of external wired remote for 50D, canon sells it for ~$300 which is almost price of Rebel :)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:16:59 +0000

True, true. Intel doubles number of semiconductors on their chips every 18-month, so why can’t canon?

So I except for 60D to be 15MP * 2 = 30MP – and please APS-C or less :)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:13:40 +0000

But this is what joins us, no?
It doesn’t matter if rumor is true at the end.
Some joined by love, some by fear and we by rumors :)