<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Fisheyes [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-25446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-25446</guid>
		<description>Its terrible that i come on here looking for some information on lenses and all i see is useless bickering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its terrible that i come on here looking for some information on lenses and all i see is useless bickering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-18305</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-18305</guid>
		<description>Excellent hoefully they bring out an excellent EF-S lens at the same time a new and much improved 17-85 IS USM or a new 17/18-105 IS USM, with ring usm. Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent hoefully they bring out an excellent EF-S lens at the same time a new and much improved 17-85 IS USM or a new 17/18-105 IS USM, with ring usm. Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16741</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-16741</guid>
		<description>Coach, roach, poach, arse.  User not in time sure for action placed in box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coach, roach, poach, arse.  User not in time sure for action placed in box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16740</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-16740</guid>
		<description>Yeah and you people how keep putting down EF-S and 1.6 crop are funny too.  Not everyone wants full frame you know, so go cry to mummy or mommy if your from the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah and you people how keep putting down EF-S and 1.6 crop are funny too.  Not everyone wants full frame you know, so go cry to mummy or mommy if your from the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coach</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16686</link>
		<dc:creator>Coach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-16686</guid>
		<description>Civility is DEAD on this site.  Rude morons make this into the rest of web sewer.  Stop it, go to elsewhere to post crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civility is DEAD on this site.  Rude morons make this into the rest of web sewer.  Stop it, go to elsewhere to post crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16609</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-16609</guid>
		<description>You people with no manners are just funny. That you also lack clues only makes you funnier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people with no manners are just funny. That you also lack clues only makes you funnier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15870</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15870</guid>
		<description>And an other thing not everyone can afford expensive lenes like 24-70 2.8L which is why we like our EF-S glass it is cheap, but it could be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And an other thing not everyone can afford expensive lenes like 24-70 2.8L which is why we like our EF-S glass it is cheap, but it could be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15868</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15868</guid>
		<description>Dr. Knob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Knob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15867</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15867</guid>
		<description>Yes right on mate it is time for some more decent EF-S stuff Nikon can do it with there DX line so why not Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes right on mate it is time for some more decent EF-S stuff Nikon can do it with there DX line so why not Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15866</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15866</guid>
		<description>And you shut up as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you shut up as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15864</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15864</guid>
		<description>Shut up idiot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shut up idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15854</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15854</guid>
		<description>no usm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no usm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15817</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15817</guid>
		<description>wtf. Canon already has a Canon 15mm fisheye..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wtf. Canon already has a Canon 15mm fisheye..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-fisheyes-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15815</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2287#comment-15815</guid>
		<description>why exactly are fisheyes like 600 dollers they are purposely distrorted seems to me there not a lot of optictal work that goes into make a wide angle with distortion


not that i know enough to make that assumption</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why exactly are fisheyes like 600 dollers they are purposely distrorted seems to me there not a lot of optictal work that goes into make a wide angle with distortion</p>
<p>not that i know enough to make that assumption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
