<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon G11 [CR2] *UPDATED*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:22:04 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: t1ixsi</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-27080</link>
		<dc:creator>t1ixsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-27080</guid>
		<description>wow! New Digital Camera update from canon, body is pretty. New Digic 4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! New Digital Camera update from canon, body is pretty. New Digic 4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lida</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-26544</link>
		<dc:creator>lida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-26544</guid>
		<description>can i ask u how much u sold ur g10 camera for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can i ask u how much u sold ur g10 camera for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-24794</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-24794</guid>
		<description>Movie mode great if that&#039;s what your looking for in a still camera. Inferior to Lx3?? Well I&#039;ve squared off G9 and G10 throughly to Lx3 at low iso(real world) and the lx3 is clearly inferior. This is not even mentioning the fact that the Lx3 is plagued with distortion issues and even though it&#039;s got that nice Sumi fast lens the G10 still shots better indoors!!??? Go figure that one out. If the G11 is an even finer camera let&#039;s not even bother making a comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movie mode great if that&#8217;s what your looking for in a still camera. Inferior to Lx3?? Well I&#8217;ve squared off G9 and G10 throughly to Lx3 at low iso(real world) and the lx3 is clearly inferior. This is not even mentioning the fact that the Lx3 is plagued with distortion issues and even though it&#8217;s got that nice Sumi fast lens the G10 still shots better indoors!!??? Go figure that one out. If the G11 is an even finer camera let&#8217;s not even bother making a comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-24757</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-24757</guid>
		<description>Looks good to me.  If you read any reviews of the G10, you&#039;d know that the biggest problem with that camera was the noise, hands down.

Canon is making a smart move keeping this line aimed squarely at the keen amateur/pro back up market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good to me.  If you read any reviews of the G10, you&#8217;d know that the biggest problem with that camera was the noise, hands down.</p>
<p>Canon is making a smart move keeping this line aimed squarely at the keen amateur/pro back up market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-19164</link>
		<dc:creator>J.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-19164</guid>
		<description>What I want is a camera that takes great pictures.  I could care less about movie mode.  It would be nice to have a larger sensor but reducing MP to 10 and increasing low light sensitivity is a good thing.  Manufactures of still cameras should concentrate on their still image quality and get rid of movie mode if it at all reduces still picture quality.  They should also bring back aperture and shutter speed dials like film cameras.  I am glad I waited and can not wait for the G11.  yea it would have been nice to have specs like the Sigma DP2 but that camera is about $700.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want is a camera that takes great pictures.  I could care less about movie mode.  It would be nice to have a larger sensor but reducing MP to 10 and increasing low light sensitivity is a good thing.  Manufactures of still cameras should concentrate on their still image quality and get rid of movie mode if it at all reduces still picture quality.  They should also bring back aperture and shutter speed dials like film cameras.  I am glad I waited and can not wait for the G11.  yea it would have been nice to have specs like the Sigma DP2 but that camera is about $700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-19039</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-19039</guid>
		<description>As Sebastian says, LESS megapixels give BETTER image quality.  Why does anyone need more than 10MP?  The glass on a camera of this type does not warrant huge enlargements.  What people want is better image quality in lower light situations, for an average print size (e.g. 4X6 or 8X10). 

High MP counts are just to sell to novice buyers. Canon reduced the MP in order to respond to the buyers for this camera who understand the difference between MP and image quality (e.g. noise).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Sebastian says, LESS megapixels give BETTER image quality.  Why does anyone need more than 10MP?  The glass on a camera of this type does not warrant huge enlargements.  What people want is better image quality in lower light situations, for an average print size (e.g. 4X6 or 8X10). </p>
<p>High MP counts are just to sell to novice buyers. Canon reduced the MP in order to respond to the buyers for this camera who understand the difference between MP and image quality (e.g. noise).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ashes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon G11 Specs Revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-18231</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ashes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon G11 Specs Revealed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-18231</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon Rumors, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon Rumors, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoky</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-17979</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-17979</guid>
		<description>I wonder what kind of reliable information you offer here? Absolutely nothing. I bet your source is your imagination. 
What G11? On some other forums they display 7D fake image.
What a waste of time. Today was supposed to be big annoucement day from Canon. Where is it? Here is the idea: make a site &quot;CanonRumorsAndMySickMindAndBunchOfLoosersWaitingForCanonsFart.com&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what kind of reliable information you offer here? Absolutely nothing. I bet your source is your imagination.<br />
What G11? On some other forums they display 7D fake image.<br />
What a waste of time. Today was supposed to be big annoucement day from Canon. Where is it? Here is the idea: make a site &#8220;CanonRumorsAndMySickMindAndBunchOfLoosersWaitingForCanonsFart.com&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qazsen</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-17623</link>
		<dc:creator>qazsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-17623</guid>
		<description>This appears to be the same 1/1.7&quot; 10MP sensor that is used in Ricoh GR Digital III. Does anyone have a pointer to high-ISO samples from Ricoh GR Digital III?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to be the same 1/1.7&#8243; 10MP sensor that is used in Ricoh GR Digital III. Does anyone have a pointer to high-ISO samples from Ricoh GR Digital III?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NATURPIXEL &#187; Canon G11</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-17489</link>
		<dc:creator>NATURPIXEL &#187; Canon G11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-17489</guid>
		<description>[...] info: Canon Rumors, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] info: Canon Rumors, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon G11 kurz vor dem Start? &#187; Preisbewertung.de</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-17462</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon G11 kurz vor dem Start? &#187; Preisbewertung.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-17462</guid>
		<description>[...] offensichtlich gut vernetzte Seite Canon Rumors, die sich klar nicht mit dem Canon Konzern verbunden sieht, hat erste Informationen zum Nachfolger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] offensichtlich gut vernetzte Seite Canon Rumors, die sich klar nicht mit dem Canon Konzern verbunden sieht, hat erste Informationen zum Nachfolger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Going On, Canon? Rumored G11 Specs Reveal Minimal Improvements [Cameras] &#124; Gadgets 4 Men!</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-17359</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Going On, Canon? Rumored G11 Specs Reveal Minimal Improvements [Cameras] &#124; Gadgets 4 Men!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-17359</guid>
		<description>[...] [Canon Rumors] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Canon Rumors] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon PowerShot G11 Specs &#124; Digital Cameras &#124;it-echo.Com::Product Review and Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-17330</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon PowerShot G11 Specs &#124; Digital Cameras &#124;it-echo.Com::Product Review and Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-17330</guid>
		<description>[...] recording quality shown. I’m calling shenanigans on this one, via crunchgear Canon G11 Specs via Canon Rumors Effective: 10.4MP, Recorded: 10.0MP 1/1.7? CCD RAW, JPEG, QuickTime Image Stabilization 6.1-30.5mm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recording quality shown. I’m calling shenanigans on this one, via crunchgear Canon G11 Specs via Canon Rumors Effective: 10.4MP, Recorded: 10.0MP 1/1.7? CCD RAW, JPEG, QuickTime Image Stabilization 6.1-30.5mm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-g11-cr2/comment-page-2/#comment-17241</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonrumors.com/?p=2331#comment-17241</guid>
		<description>10mp is great. But Canon better get some wider, fast glass in there or I&#039;m going with the Lumix LX3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10mp is great. But Canon better get some wider, fast glass in there or I&#8217;m going with the Lumix LX3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
