<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon S90</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 77gq</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-33490</link>
		<dc:creator>77gq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-33490</guid>
		<description>I read online that you can use the other 2 aspect ratios aswell as the 4:3, but at the detriment of less pixels compared to the Panasonic LX3.

I could live with that. Dooes anyone know?

Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read online that you can use the other 2 aspect ratios aswell as the 4:3, but at the detriment of less pixels compared to the Panasonic LX3.</p>
<p>I could live with that. Dooes anyone know?</p>
<p>Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 77gq</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-33386</link>
		<dc:creator>77gq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-33386</guid>
		<description>I have been waiting a long time for a camera like this. Am so upset it doesn&#039;t have a 3:2 aspect ratio too.
I can&#039;t see why it doesn&#039;t.

Could this be changed with a firmware update I wonder?

Now have to hope the next one in this series does. Such an important omission. Argh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been waiting a long time for a camera like this. Am so upset it doesn&#8217;t have a 3:2 aspect ratio too.<br />
I can&#8217;t see why it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Could this be changed with a firmware update I wonder?</p>
<p>Now have to hope the next one in this series does. Such an important omission. Argh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickZ</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-27030</link>
		<dc:creator>RickZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-27030</guid>
		<description>The S90 is looking like the perfect pocket companion to my 40D.  When hauling around a DSLR and 4 lenses isn&#039;t practical, this should be perfect.

Great job, Canon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The S90 is looking like the perfect pocket companion to my 40D.  When hauling around a DSLR and 4 lenses isn&#8217;t practical, this should be perfect.</p>
<p>Great job, Canon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fromme</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-26353</link>
		<dc:creator>fromme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-26353</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty obvious why Canon didn&#039;t provide HD video on the S90.  It&#039;s called &quot;planned obsolescence.&quot;  By not providing HD, they can launch a S90x 9 months from now and sell the early adopters two cameras instead of just one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty obvious why Canon didn&#8217;t provide HD video on the S90.  It&#8217;s called &#8220;planned obsolescence.&#8221;  By not providing HD, they can launch a S90x 9 months from now and sell the early adopters two cameras instead of just one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-25890</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-25890</guid>
		<description>yes sony. http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/vol57/pdf/icx685cqz.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes sony. <a href="http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/vol57/pdf/icx685cqz.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/vol57/pdf/icx685cqz.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-25889</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-25889</guid>
		<description>The readout rate of the CCD in the S90 is slow, so it can only handle 640x480 at 30fps.

See http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/vol57/pdf/icx685cqz.pdf for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The readout rate of the CCD in the S90 is slow, so it can only handle 640&#215;480 at 30fps.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/vol57/pdf/icx685cqz.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/vol57/pdf/icx685cqz.pdf</a> for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A different Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-25448</link>
		<dc:creator>A different Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-25448</guid>
		<description>I also have a nice DSLR but want something smaller for the times when lugging a DSLR around is too cumbersome. I&#039;m OK with the video not being HD. If I want awesome photo horsepower I use the DSLR, if I want awesome video horsepower I use the video camera. The S90 is a very pocketable alternative to both, albeit without the absolute quality of the physically larger, purpose built options. Seems fair to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have a nice DSLR but want something smaller for the times when lugging a DSLR around is too cumbersome. I&#8217;m OK with the video not being HD. If I want awesome photo horsepower I use the DSLR, if I want awesome video horsepower I use the video camera. The S90 is a very pocketable alternative to both, albeit without the absolute quality of the physically larger, purpose built options. Seems fair to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-25429</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-25429</guid>
		<description>I also think a fixed lens is nuts. That would be a very small market. If you could swap lenses like a mini-DSRL, you&#039;d lose the small size and add weight. I think Canon has made a good compromise for advanced amateurs or pros who want a pocket size camera and still get some of the features that make the DSLR market so big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think a fixed lens is nuts. That would be a very small market. If you could swap lenses like a mini-DSRL, you&#8217;d lose the small size and add weight. I think Canon has made a good compromise for advanced amateurs or pros who want a pocket size camera and still get some of the features that make the DSLR market so big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uli</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-21959</link>
		<dc:creator>Uli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-21959</guid>
		<description>Does anybody knows whether the flash always pops up when you turn the camera on (like the canon sx200) ?
I find this &quot;feature&quot; really annoying wiht the sx200 ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody knows whether the flash always pops up when you turn the camera on (like the canon sx200) ?<br />
I find this &#8220;feature&#8221; really annoying wiht the sx200 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-21600</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-21600</guid>
		<description>re: 16:9 aspect ratio

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_s90.asp
according to specs list, that aspect ratio is a low resolution alternative at 3648 x 2048 pixels (7.5MP).

i&#039;m guessing you can set it to RAW + JPEG and compose JPEG at 16:9 and crop accordingly in the RAW conversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: 16:9 aspect ratio</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_s90.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_s90.asp</a><br />
according to specs list, that aspect ratio is a low resolution alternative at 3648 x 2048 pixels (7.5MP).</p>
<p>i&#8217;m guessing you can set it to RAW + JPEG and compose JPEG at 16:9 and crop accordingly in the RAW conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-21599</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-21599</guid>
		<description>re: 16:9 aspect ratio

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_s90.asp
according to specs list, that aspect ratio is a low resolution alternative at 3648 x 2048 pixels (7.5MP).

i&#039;m guessing you can set it to RAW + JPEG and compose JPEG at 16:9 and crop accordingly in the RAW conversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: 16:9 aspect ratio</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_s90.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_s90.asp</a><br />
according to specs list, that aspect ratio is a low resolution alternative at 3648 x 2048 pixels (7.5MP).</p>
<p>i&#8217;m guessing you can set it to RAW + JPEG and compose JPEG at 16:9 and crop accordingly in the RAW conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-19940</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-19940</guid>
		<description>I want one with HD video!  I&#039;m laughing how every 2nd comment is asking for HD video with all the responses that HD video isn&#039;t important...

with entry level slrs so cheap, the only draw of a compact camera is compactness

sorry but being able to take great pics, and  2 minutes videos of my kids with the camera in my pocket is a huge plus....and I don&#039;t want to carry around a video camera too.  It would be easier to carry around an hd capable slr than 2 devices - and probably cheaper...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want one with HD video!  I&#8217;m laughing how every 2nd comment is asking for HD video with all the responses that HD video isn&#8217;t important&#8230;</p>
<p>with entry level slrs so cheap, the only draw of a compact camera is compactness</p>
<p>sorry but being able to take great pics, and  2 minutes videos of my kids with the camera in my pocket is a huge plus&#8230;.and I don&#8217;t want to carry around a video camera too.  It would be easier to carry around an hd capable slr than 2 devices &#8211; and probably cheaper&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-19311</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-19311</guid>
		<description>1920x1080=2mp, you have over 12 mp to work with, if you shoot cropped 16:9 you&#039;re probably working with 9mps.
I don&#039;t get the concern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1920&#215;1080=2mp, you have over 12 mp to work with, if you shoot cropped 16:9 you&#8217;re probably working with 9mps.<br />
I don&#8217;t get the concern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/canon-s90/comment-page-1/#comment-19310</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2361#comment-19310</guid>
		<description>lol if good quality images are secondary, get yourself a video camera. 
Silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol if good quality images are secondary, get yourself a video camera.<br />
Silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.043 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 09:20:35 -->
