<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macro Lenses &amp; More [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-32518</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-32518</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vitamine k</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-24481</link>
		<dc:creator>vitamine k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-24481</guid>
		<description>It looks bulky. Has anyone tried it? Let me know if anyone has used it or not? Thanks for the information. I got one more option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks bulky. Has anyone tried it? Let me know if anyone has used it or not? Thanks for the information. I got one more option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomofumi</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-21951</link>
		<dc:creator>tomofumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-21951</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see the new 70-200 weight below 1kg...but is it possible....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see the new 70-200 weight below 1kg&#8230;but is it possible&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the bund</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20238</link>
		<dc:creator>the bund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20238</guid>
		<description>ha ha ha as a sony user you use a sony!!! ha ha ha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha ha ha as a sony user you use a sony!!! ha ha ha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony User</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20237</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20237</guid>
		<description>haha, as a sony user, we can harness carl zeiss 135 1.8 with in body IS.

what does canon have?  a cheap f2.0 without IS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, as a sony user, we can harness carl zeiss 135 1.8 with in body IS.</p>
<p>what does canon have?  a cheap f2.0 without IS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJBJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20123</link>
		<dc:creator>TheJBJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20123</guid>
		<description>Because there&#039;s better IS in a version of the lens that&#039;s almost $700 less. Because it&#039;s the most used pro zoom lens in Canon&#039;s lineup. Because the 24-70 is actually really good at what it does. And lastly, because I bought the 24-70 in Feb. of this year :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because there&#8217;s better IS in a version of the lens that&#8217;s almost $700 less. Because it&#8217;s the most used pro zoom lens in Canon&#8217;s lineup. Because the 24-70 is actually really good at what it does. And lastly, because I bought the 24-70 in Feb. of this year :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJBJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20122</link>
		<dc:creator>TheJBJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20122</guid>
		<description>Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJBJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20121</link>
		<dc:creator>TheJBJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20121</guid>
		<description>Yeah....I would like to see it, but it&#039;s not that important. I love my 24-70, and once you get used to it the lack of IS really isn&#039;t an issue. Now the 70-200 2.8L IS could really benefit from a 5 stop IS. The focal length on the 24-70 is short enough that the IS shouldn&#039;t matter as much.....Of course, if they come out with an IS you can buy my current 24-70 and I&#039;ll pretend like I didn&#039;t say this when I&#039;m in line to buy the new one :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;.I would like to see it, but it&#8217;s not that important. I love my 24-70, and once you get used to it the lack of IS really isn&#8217;t an issue. Now the 70-200 2.8L IS could really benefit from a 5 stop IS. The focal length on the 24-70 is short enough that the IS shouldn&#8217;t matter as much&#8230;..Of course, if they come out with an IS you can buy my current 24-70 and I&#8217;ll pretend like I didn&#8217;t say this when I&#8217;m in line to buy the new one :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theskunk</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20073</link>
		<dc:creator>theskunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20073</guid>
		<description>why on earth the 70-200 IS before the 24-70??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why on earth the 70-200 IS before the 24-70??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kubelik</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20068</link>
		<dc:creator>kubelik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20068</guid>
		<description>exactly.  btw are you using a ring flash or top-mounted flash unit with diffuser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly.  btw are you using a ring flash or top-mounted flash unit with diffuser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the bund</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20059</link>
		<dc:creator>the bund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20059</guid>
		<description>100-400mm could use an upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100-400mm could use an upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwac</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20047</link>
		<dc:creator>gwac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20047</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re thinking of the HDP (Hybrid Direct Print) technology... That&#039;s not due out til next year. It&#039;s going to revolutionize direct printing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re thinking of the HDP (Hybrid Direct Print) technology&#8230; That&#8217;s not due out til next year. It&#8217;s going to revolutionize direct printing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20039</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20039</guid>
		<description>Is there any word on the new Hybrid IS improving performance of the direct print button? (Sorry just couldn&#039;t resist after reading comments in one of the other posts.) I would love to see updated versions of the 35L and 135L that way I can buy used copies of them when folks upgrade to the new and improved copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any word on the new Hybrid IS improving performance of the direct print button? (Sorry just couldn&#8217;t resist after reading comments in one of the other posts.) I would love to see updated versions of the 35L and 135L that way I can buy used copies of them when folks upgrade to the new and improved copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20037</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20037</guid>
		<description>+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.029 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-11 22:31:38 -->
