Comments on: Macro Lenses & More [CR1] http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/ You gotta know Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:08:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Paul Smith Shoes http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-32518 Paul Smith Shoes Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:06:21 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-32518 Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets </a> and <a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter- buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good. Many people have alos become fans of Paul Smith Shoes since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like Paul Smith Wallets and <a Paul Smith Belts,It designs very good.

]]> By: vitamine k http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-24481 vitamine k Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:02:11 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-24481 It looks bulky. Has anyone tried it? Let me know if anyone has used it or not? Thanks for the information. I got one more option. It looks bulky. Has anyone tried it? Let me know if anyone has used it or not? Thanks for the information. I got one more option.

]]> By: tomofumi http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-21951 tomofumi Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:35:47 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-21951 I'd like to see the new 70-200 weight below 1kg...but is it possible.... I’d like to see the new 70-200 weight below 1kg…but is it possible….

]]> By: the bund http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20238 the bund Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:45:00 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20238 ha ha ha as a sony user you use a sony!!! ha ha ha ha ha ha as a sony user you use a sony!!! ha ha ha

]]> By: Sony User http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20237 Sony User Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:42:27 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20237 haha, as a sony user, we can harness carl zeiss 135 1.8 with in body IS. what does canon have? a cheap f2.0 without IS? haha, as a sony user, we can harness carl zeiss 135 1.8 with in body IS.

what does canon have? a cheap f2.0 without IS?

]]> By: TheJBJ http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20123 TheJBJ Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:51:54 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20123 Because there's better IS in a version of the lens that's almost $700 less. Because it's the most used pro zoom lens in Canon's lineup. Because the 24-70 is actually really good at what it does. And lastly, because I bought the 24-70 in Feb. of this year :) Because there’s better IS in a version of the lens that’s almost $700 less. Because it’s the most used pro zoom lens in Canon’s lineup. Because the 24-70 is actually really good at what it does. And lastly, because I bought the 24-70 in Feb. of this year :)

]]> By: TheJBJ http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20122 TheJBJ Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:49:50 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20122 Nice. Nice.

]]> By: TheJBJ http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20121 TheJBJ Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:49:10 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20121 Yeah....I would like to see it, but it's not that important. I love my 24-70, and once you get used to it the lack of IS really isn't an issue. Now the 70-200 2.8L IS could really benefit from a 5 stop IS. The focal length on the 24-70 is short enough that the IS shouldn't matter as much.....Of course, if they come out with an IS you can buy my current 24-70 and I'll pretend like I didn't say this when I'm in line to buy the new one :) Yeah….I would like to see it, but it’s not that important. I love my 24-70, and once you get used to it the lack of IS really isn’t an issue. Now the 70-200 2.8L IS could really benefit from a 5 stop IS. The focal length on the 24-70 is short enough that the IS shouldn’t matter as much…..Of course, if they come out with an IS you can buy my current 24-70 and I’ll pretend like I didn’t say this when I’m in line to buy the new one :)

]]> By: theskunk http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20073 theskunk Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:41:05 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20073 why on earth the 70-200 IS before the 24-70?? why on earth the 70-200 IS before the 24-70??

]]> By: kubelik http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/macro-lenses-more-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-20068 kubelik Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:23:51 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2471#comment-20068 exactly. btw are you using a ring flash or top-mounted flash unit with diffuser? exactly. btw are you using a ring flash or top-mounted flash unit with diffuser?

]]>