<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerShots [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:22:04 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renato</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16291</link>
		<dc:creator>Renato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-16291</guid>
		<description>GX1 seems nice.
Hope that it has a fast lens f/2.5-4.0 or faster would be very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GX1 seems nice.<br />
Hope that it has a fast lens f/2.5-4.0 or faster would be very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forester</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16174</link>
		<dc:creator>Forester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-16174</guid>
		<description>How is the sensor size still such a secret?   It&#039;s the most important feature of the G11.  It&#039;s what we&#039;re all waiting to hear about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the sensor size still such a secret?   It&#8217;s the most important feature of the G11.  It&#8217;s what we&#8217;re all waiting to hear about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Direct Print Button Czar</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-16005</link>
		<dc:creator>Direct Print Button Czar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-16005</guid>
		<description>pwned</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pwned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kubelik</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15983</link>
		<dc:creator>kubelik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15983</guid>
		<description>I want an Infrared toggle button</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want an Infrared toggle button</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15979</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15979</guid>
		<description>that and built-in projectors are the bomb at raves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that and built-in projectors are the bomb at raves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kal</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15973</link>
		<dc:creator>Kal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15973</guid>
		<description>If they make that sensor as big or close to the 4/3 then I&#039;m interested, otherwise, go back to the drawing board.
How about an articulating screen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they make that sensor as big or close to the 4/3 then I&#8217;m interested, otherwise, go back to the drawing board.<br />
How about an articulating screen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15936</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15936</guid>
		<description>Samsung has a P&amp;S with oled, so Canon won&#039;t be first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung has a P&amp;S with oled, so Canon won&#8217;t be first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15934</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15934</guid>
		<description>Canon did remove raw for one generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon did remove raw for one generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15908</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15908</guid>
		<description>DSLR&#039;s are much more profitable than point and shoots.  Canon wants to sell a lot of them, not only for profit, but so that owners will move up to DSLR&#039;s where the profit margin is much better.  And, of course, they will buy lenses, where profits are higher yet.  This is pretty well known and often commented on by experts who do financial reviews of Canon and Nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DSLR&#8217;s are much more profitable than point and shoots.  Canon wants to sell a lot of them, not only for profit, but so that owners will move up to DSLR&#8217;s where the profit margin is much better.  And, of course, they will buy lenses, where profits are higher yet.  This is pretty well known and often commented on by experts who do financial reviews of Canon and Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Gravel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15904</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Gravel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15904</guid>
		<description>@ Me, and only me:

Lets just hope Canon has seen the light :/  I too find this &quot;more megapixels&quot; move from Canon dissapointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Me, and only me:</p>
<p>Lets just hope Canon has seen the light :/  I too find this &#8220;more megapixels&#8221; move from Canon dissapointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15901</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15901</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s a real successor to the G series, I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll have RAW and full manual. I agree that the question is the lens (assuming the rumor specs we do have our accurate.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s a real successor to the G series, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll have RAW and full manual. I agree that the question is the lens (assuming the rumor specs we do have our accurate.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15899</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15899</guid>
		<description>People always say things like this, as if a company is like an individual that has limited time. No. If a product or division is successful, they hire more people. Reducing development of compacts would cost jobs at Canon, but will *not* increase development of lenses or EOS bodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People always say things like this, as if a company is like an individual that has limited time. No. If a product or division is successful, they hire more people. Reducing development of compacts would cost jobs at Canon, but will *not* increase development of lenses or EOS bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ichiban</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15884</link>
		<dc:creator>ichiban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15884</guid>
		<description>still DIGIC IV...

-CMOS sensor
-1080p video
-OLED screen

the other seem to similar to G10...

give me f/2.0~~~

althrough i&#039;m looking forward to 60D to replace my G10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still DIGIC IV&#8230;</p>
<p>-CMOS sensor<br />
-1080p video<br />
-OLED screen</p>
<p>the other seem to similar to G10&#8230;</p>
<p>give me f/2.0~~~</p>
<p>althrough i&#8217;m looking forward to 60D to replace my G10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me, and only me</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/powershots-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-15862</link>
		<dc:creator>Me, and only me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.13.226.237/?p=2302#comment-15862</guid>
		<description>So, if I have this correct, Canon are going to introduce a replacement for the G10 with lower resolution (12MP vs 14.7MP) but a larger sensor? I take it that &quot;larger sensor&quot; therefore means physically larger? Therefore the pixel density should be considerably lower than the G10&#039;s 34MP/cm2.

Although I applaud this move, and could even be tempted, it doesn&#039;t strike me as very likely for a company that seems to be fixated on more megapixels as a marketing tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if I have this correct, Canon are going to introduce a replacement for the G10 with lower resolution (12MP vs 14.7MP) but a larger sensor? I take it that &#8220;larger sensor&#8221; therefore means physically larger? Therefore the pixel density should be considerably lower than the G10&#8242;s 34MP/cm2.</p>
<p>Although I applaud this move, and could even be tempted, it doesn&#8217;t strike me as very likely for a company that seems to be fixated on more megapixels as a marketing tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
