<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumors Rumors Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-18306</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-18306</guid>
		<description>Excellent hoefully they bring out an excellent EF-S lens at the same time a new and much improved 17-85 IS USM or a new 17/18-105 IS USM, with ring usm. Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent hoefully they bring out an excellent EF-S lens at the same time a new and much improved 17-85 IS USM or a new 17/18-105 IS USM, with ring usm. Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-16312</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-16312</guid>
		<description>Yep something needs soring out here Canon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep something needs soring out here Canon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-16156</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-16156</guid>
		<description>That woukd be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That woukd be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-16155</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-16155</guid>
		<description>that would be cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that would be cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 60d to be announced on August 19th or 25th &#171; Outofnapkins</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-16108</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 60d to be announced on August 19th or 25th &#171; Outofnapkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-16108</guid>
		<description>[...] link number one: CanonRumors.com : Rumors, Rumors, Rumors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link number one: CanonRumors.com : Rumors, Rumors, Rumors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-16015</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-16015</guid>
		<description>i hope the 5d2 update has 720p @ 60 fps like the lumix :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope the 5d2 update has 720p @ 60 fps like the lumix :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kubelik</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15974</link>
		<dc:creator>kubelik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15974</guid>
		<description>haha maybe waterproof G11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha maybe waterproof G11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gws</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15961</link>
		<dc:creator>Gws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15961</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called L or Luxury just simply because they use flourite in the glass. L or luxury is the same thing. Why are they called L? Due to flourite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called L or Luxury just simply because they use flourite in the glass. L or luxury is the same thing. Why are they called L? Due to flourite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mabus</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15892</link>
		<dc:creator>mabus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15892</guid>
		<description>and what about a new version of the old 17-85is? larger aperture and less distortion are necessary!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what about a new version of the old 17-85is? larger aperture and less distortion are necessary!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15689</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15689</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying they are not calling them luxury lenses, but the fact is it is the Flourite that makes them L lenses. If you don&#039;t believe me, or Canon for that matter as they clearly state L lenses use Florite and non-L lenses dont, please explain how the $5500 white weather sealed 400mm 4.0 DO is NOT a luxury lens? 

Other than the lack of Flourite, name one thing that does not make it a luxury lens?

Do you think people spending $5500 on a lens are believing it&#039;s not a luxury lens?

Sure Canon marketing might say L is for luxury, but then what about the 400 4.0 DO that not an L lens for $5500? Marketing people don&#039;t always think things through. As Canon states about the L lenses, they are all made with Flourite elements, and no other lens except L lenses use Flourite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying they are not calling them luxury lenses, but the fact is it is the Flourite that makes them L lenses. If you don&#8217;t believe me, or Canon for that matter as they clearly state L lenses use Florite and non-L lenses dont, please explain how the $5500 white weather sealed 400mm 4.0 DO is NOT a luxury lens? </p>
<p>Other than the lack of Flourite, name one thing that does not make it a luxury lens?</p>
<p>Do you think people spending $5500 on a lens are believing it&#8217;s not a luxury lens?</p>
<p>Sure Canon marketing might say L is for luxury, but then what about the 400 4.0 DO that not an L lens for $5500? Marketing people don&#8217;t always think things through. As Canon states about the L lenses, they are all made with Flourite elements, and no other lens except L lenses use Flourite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15685</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15685</guid>
		<description>they listened when everone asked for manual control of the video on the 5D2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they listened when everone asked for manual control of the video on the 5D2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15592</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15592</guid>
		<description>I am with you David, having it in white would be perfect. Of course, I also want internal zooming also just because the 70-200 lenses have me spoiled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you David, having it in white would be perfect. Of course, I also want internal zooming also just because the 70-200 lenses have me spoiled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15588</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15588</guid>
		<description>Also from Canon:

http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20071015_eflens.html

Quote:
&quot;The new Canon EF200mm f/2L IS USM and EF800mm f/5.6L IS USM, both of which are L (luxury)-series lenses incorporating a high-performance Image Stabilizer&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also from Canon:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20071015_eflens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20071015_eflens.html</a></p>
<p>Quote:<br />
&#8220;The new Canon EF200mm f/2L IS USM and EF800mm f/5.6L IS USM, both of which are L (luxury)-series lenses incorporating a high-performance Image Stabilizer&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/rumors-rumors-rumors-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15548</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2281#comment-15548</guid>
		<description>+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
