Comments on: Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 VC [CR3]

By: Paul Smith Shoes

Paul Smith Shoes — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:45:16 +0000

Many people have alos become fans of Paul Smith Shoes since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like Paul Smith Wallets and Paul Smith Belts,It designs very good.

By: bomboman

bomboman — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:37:37 +0000

This lens is very nice and affordable. Please see my review http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/

By: viet

viet — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:58:55 +0000

i’m no expert but i’m pretty sure that the IS is pretty much gyroscopes in the lens that measure the movement of the camera and counteract that movement. it will not change based on what the lens i seeing, so if anything it would make panning smoother.

By: John J

John J — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:32:41 +0000

I hate to break the thread mood here- but technical question(s). What happens when you pan a moving object with image stabiliaztion? Is there conflict? Secondly – does a steady hand and fast moving object ever get reversed so to cause the object to be out of focus? Must sound like stupid question but I wonder. Are there competing technologies to compensate this problem if it is one?

By: nostyle

nostyle — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:23:14 +0000

Wow, what a rude thing to say.

I guess when you hide behind the “Anonymous” name you can say anything you want. Even very rude things. Man, the Internet is lame.

Do you even talk to real people, in the real world? I suspect you don’t do much of that, which is why you’re so mean spirited in the anonymous safety of the Internet.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:43:39 +0000

I bought one 2.5 years ago. Should have waited…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:42:04 +0000

It is however fabulous for a cheap piece of plastic.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:40:36 +0000

Do you worry about the resale value when you buy a wrench? How about a wheelbarrow, or a frying pan?

These are all tools. As are people who suggest that resale value is a valid reason for not buying Tamron/Sigma/Tokina/etc.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:38:07 +0000

Sometimes people sleep

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:37:46 +0000

That’s what she wanted

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:56:51 +0000

luved that joke. didn’t know it though. thanks for shearing

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:55:57 +0000

whots up with the cr-guy? the release is official and no post on the cr-website? is he still allive? or is it because it’s no rumor anymoar???

By: Bryan

Bryan — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:36:55 +0000

The Nikon 17-55/2.8 is built like a tank because in Nikonland, the pro D2x was a crop :)

The pros needed something with decent built quality and a good range..

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:14:35 +0000

You don’t say!? That is their model, don’t invest in research but reverse engineer other technology and offer it at a low price.