<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5D Mark II Firmware Update?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5D MKII or 7D for shooting video? - Salted Chips</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-38932</link>
		<dc:creator>5D MKII or 7D for shooting video? - Salted Chips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-38932</guid>
		<description>[...] more but this is a major disadvantage of the 5D. Rumor has it that in the future Canon will be releasing a firmware upgrade to add more framerate options to the 5D including [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more but this is a major disadvantage of the 5D. Rumor has it that in the future Canon will be releasing a firmware upgrade to add more framerate options to the 5D including [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-32503</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-32503</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvertJan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24843</link>
		<dc:creator>EvertJan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24843</guid>
		<description>Dont talk about other peoples brains before you know how to use your own:

http://www.16-9.net/nikon_g/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont talk about other peoples brains before you know how to use your own:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.16-9.net/nikon_g/" rel="nofollow">http://www.16-9.net/nikon_g/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24774</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24774</guid>
		<description>Using center AF point?  Even if not, I imagine the band is staying relatively still for you.  I know the mk2 isn&#039;t marketed for taking shots if your kid in low light, but it just can&#039;t do that.  You can center-AF-point everything and have decent luck, then you&#039;re wasting most of your 21mpx.

I&#039;ve been having great luck with Live View - even Live View contrast focusing on still stuff in low light.  It&#039;s way better than I originally thought.  I hold the AF-ON button and shutter button quickly after it so once focus is achieved it takes the shot immediately.  So I don&#039;t care about viewfinder AF in low light for still stuff, but when your subject&#039;s moving and there&#039;s not much light, you&#039;re SOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using center AF point?  Even if not, I imagine the band is staying relatively still for you.  I know the mk2 isn&#8217;t marketed for taking shots if your kid in low light, but it just can&#8217;t do that.  You can center-AF-point everything and have decent luck, then you&#8217;re wasting most of your 21mpx.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been having great luck with Live View &#8211; even Live View contrast focusing on still stuff in low light.  It&#8217;s way better than I originally thought.  I hold the AF-ON button and shutter button quickly after it so once focus is achieved it takes the shot immediately.  So I don&#8217;t care about viewfinder AF in low light for still stuff, but when your subject&#8217;s moving and there&#8217;s not much light, you&#8217;re SOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24772</guid>
		<description>AF works brilliantly for me.  I shoot mainly gigs in very low light, with rapidly moving performers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AF works brilliantly for me.  I shoot mainly gigs in very low light, with rapidly moving performers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24728</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 07:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24728</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I meant the higher FPS with 720p. As far as I know, no one has 60FPS @ 1080p in these price ranges and I doubt we&#039;ll see it anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I meant the higher FPS with 720p. As far as I know, no one has 60FPS @ 1080p in these price ranges and I doubt we&#8217;ll see it anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24716</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 03:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24716</guid>
		<description>1080p 60p, that is some serious data output. Would be great to have though. Sadly I doubt Nikon are going to pull a rabbit out of the hat with regards to video, They had their chance with the 300Ds but they blew it. Canon came back with the 7D and ruined their party. I&#039;m sure Canon is preparing &#039;knock your socks off&#039; video for the 1D Mark IV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1080p 60p, that is some serious data output. Would be great to have though. Sadly I doubt Nikon are going to pull a rabbit out of the hat with regards to video, They had their chance with the 300Ds but they blew it. Canon came back with the 7D and ruined their party. I&#8217;m sure Canon is preparing &#8216;knock your socks off&#8217; video for the 1D Mark IV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24694</guid>
		<description>The point of using Nikon lenses was the aperture ring on them when there were no manual controls. Nikon G lenses don&#039;t have this ring, being their latest line with electronic control. I don&#039;t think anyone with half a brain would go out and buy a Nikon G lens for their 5D.

Hopefully the D700X will have FF and 24/25/30/50/60fps at 1080p. It&#039;s the only way were ever going to see it on the 5D Mark II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of using Nikon lenses was the aperture ring on them when there were no manual controls. Nikon G lenses don&#8217;t have this ring, being their latest line with electronic control. I don&#8217;t think anyone with half a brain would go out and buy a Nikon G lens for their 5D.</p>
<p>Hopefully the D700X will have FF and 24/25/30/50/60fps at 1080p. It&#8217;s the only way were ever going to see it on the 5D Mark II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shalom</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24642</link>
		<dc:creator>Shalom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24642</guid>
		<description>Philip Bloom reckons Canon will make some sort of announcement before the 7D but it&#039;s just his personal guess not any insider information.

quote from http://www.twitter.com/philipbloom;

&quot;i think they will let us know one way or another. $50 says they will before 7d hits the streets.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Bloom reckons Canon will make some sort of announcement before the 7D but it&#8217;s just his personal guess not any insider information.</p>
<p>quote from <a href="http://www.twitter.com/philipbloom" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/philipbloom</a>;</p>
<p>&#8220;i think they will let us know one way or another. $50 says they will before 7d hits the streets.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CameraSam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24624</link>
		<dc:creator>CameraSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24624</guid>
		<description>I usually hate entering these kinds of discussions, but this one seems fun! :) 

I work in an industry that releases software products all the time.  I also write iPhone apps on my own time.  The truth of the matter is, it is common to release products that cripple or hide functionality.  Sometimes you just don&#039;t have time to fully test them before product launch.  Sometimes you&#039;re just not sure if you want to release it, or charge more for it later.  I personally get sick of people &quot;demanding&quot; features as if they are entitled to them...with that said, everyone is entitled to their opinions!  We live in an age where information and communication have been facilitated greatly by technology.  These people that demand features are good in the sense that they provide feedback on what the consumer wants...and better yet, it&#039;s free to the developer!

In this day and age, people expect more for their money, and they expect constant gratification.  This is actually anticipated in any product cycle I work on.  I am currently working on a product where we are purposely withholding fantastic features, with the sole purpose of trickling them out to end users over time.  The reason for this is continued satisfaction with the company.  When you keep delivering new features, it keeps customers happy, and makes them think you are listening to their requests.

We are also withholding features that just aren&#039;t quite ready.  The development cycle is always ongoing, and if we miss it for this product, we&#039;ll just add it to a future product.  

Finally, we hold back certain features as a competitive advantage.  If we feel we are ahead of the competition already, then we don&#039;t always feel the need to release something that we can charge more for later.  If the competition starts gaining ground, we have features that are ready to release, always keeping us ahead.

Firmware fixes are the same, and I guarantee you Canon is working on all sorts of great firmware updates, features, etc...Some will see the light of day, some will not.  

As for people spouting off about the incredible cost of doing upgrades...that just depends...A company like Canon has (must) all sorts of automated regression testing modules in place to test any new features that might come through any firmware update.  That is in place before any product is released.  It has to be just in case they have emergency firmware releases that need to go to market immediately.

The truth of the matter is, we live in an age where it is expected, and common, to get upgrades throughout a product&#039;s lifecycle.  My iPhone has been updated many times.  DVD players, televisions, game consoles, software, all get updates.  It&#039;s expected, both by consumers, and developers.

At the end of the day, you get what you get,...you are free to complain, you are free to buy other products, and you are free to just be happy with what you already got.  I received my 5DmkII yesterday, and am looking forward to it AS IS.  With that said,  I FULLY anticipate a 24p release on this camera.  Not so sure about 720/60p, but I can live without either feature, which is what I bought into when I signed the check for the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually hate entering these kinds of discussions, but this one seems fun! :) </p>
<p>I work in an industry that releases software products all the time.  I also write iPhone apps on my own time.  The truth of the matter is, it is common to release products that cripple or hide functionality.  Sometimes you just don&#8217;t have time to fully test them before product launch.  Sometimes you&#8217;re just not sure if you want to release it, or charge more for it later.  I personally get sick of people &#8220;demanding&#8221; features as if they are entitled to them&#8230;with that said, everyone is entitled to their opinions!  We live in an age where information and communication have been facilitated greatly by technology.  These people that demand features are good in the sense that they provide feedback on what the consumer wants&#8230;and better yet, it&#8217;s free to the developer!</p>
<p>In this day and age, people expect more for their money, and they expect constant gratification.  This is actually anticipated in any product cycle I work on.  I am currently working on a product where we are purposely withholding fantastic features, with the sole purpose of trickling them out to end users over time.  The reason for this is continued satisfaction with the company.  When you keep delivering new features, it keeps customers happy, and makes them think you are listening to their requests.</p>
<p>We are also withholding features that just aren&#8217;t quite ready.  The development cycle is always ongoing, and if we miss it for this product, we&#8217;ll just add it to a future product.  </p>
<p>Finally, we hold back certain features as a competitive advantage.  If we feel we are ahead of the competition already, then we don&#8217;t always feel the need to release something that we can charge more for later.  If the competition starts gaining ground, we have features that are ready to release, always keeping us ahead.</p>
<p>Firmware fixes are the same, and I guarantee you Canon is working on all sorts of great firmware updates, features, etc&#8230;Some will see the light of day, some will not.  </p>
<p>As for people spouting off about the incredible cost of doing upgrades&#8230;that just depends&#8230;A company like Canon has (must) all sorts of automated regression testing modules in place to test any new features that might come through any firmware update.  That is in place before any product is released.  It has to be just in case they have emergency firmware releases that need to go to market immediately.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is, we live in an age where it is expected, and common, to get upgrades throughout a product&#8217;s lifecycle.  My iPhone has been updated many times.  DVD players, televisions, game consoles, software, all get updates.  It&#8217;s expected, both by consumers, and developers.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, you get what you get,&#8230;you are free to complain, you are free to buy other products, and you are free to just be happy with what you already got.  I received my 5DmkII yesterday, and am looking forward to it AS IS.  With that said,  I FULLY anticipate a 24p release on this camera.  Not so sure about 720/60p, but I can live without either feature, which is what I bought into when I signed the check for the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvertJan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24608</link>
		<dc:creator>EvertJan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24608</guid>
		<description>Do you actually know what you are saying?
G-lenses are the latest ones addded to their range
Do a survey on why 5DII-users (video) prefer these over Canon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you actually know what you are saying?<br />
G-lenses are the latest ones addded to their range<br />
Do a survey on why 5DII-users (video) prefer these over Canon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24602</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24602</guid>
		<description>I should have stipulated - Nikon just don&#039;t have the range of modern glass that Canon has.  Lots of great old Nikon glass, that&#039;s for sure - but they are always lacking in current key areas, areas which Canon exceed in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have stipulated &#8211; Nikon just don&#8217;t have the range of modern glass that Canon has.  Lots of great old Nikon glass, that&#8217;s for sure &#8211; but they are always lacking in current key areas, areas which Canon exceed in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark L</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24597</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24597</guid>
		<description>With the news industry its all about compromise (although the emphasis is on quantity and speed rather than quality at the moment but don&#039;t get me started on that!) and having to adapt how you shoot. 

For audio i&#039;ve been using a mix of the Rode Stereo mic mounted on the hotshoe and a Rode NTG-2 into an external recorder. Its not worked too bad (i have used a beachtek mounted under the camera but didn&#039;t really like it) but for the doc stuff we&#039;ve just picked up a marantz unit.

I&#039;m not too bothered about a flip out screen, while it could be handy i can see me breaking it! But i&#039;d like to try the Red Rock stuff, just the base unit with a handle, and the loupe on the screen. Kind of use it like an old Super8 camera. 

I think it was you i talked with awhile back about a 1920x1080 virtual crop mode to have as wide a dof as possible for a given fov. That would be nice until video af is better.

But yeah, i&#039;m sure we&#039;re just at the beginning of all this and things will progress rapidly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the news industry its all about compromise (although the emphasis is on quantity and speed rather than quality at the moment but don&#8217;t get me started on that!) and having to adapt how you shoot. </p>
<p>For audio i&#8217;ve been using a mix of the Rode Stereo mic mounted on the hotshoe and a Rode NTG-2 into an external recorder. Its not worked too bad (i have used a beachtek mounted under the camera but didn&#8217;t really like it) but for the doc stuff we&#8217;ve just picked up a marantz unit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not too bothered about a flip out screen, while it could be handy i can see me breaking it! But i&#8217;d like to try the Red Rock stuff, just the base unit with a handle, and the loupe on the screen. Kind of use it like an old Super8 camera. </p>
<p>I think it was you i talked with awhile back about a 1920&#215;1080 virtual crop mode to have as wide a dof as possible for a given fov. That would be nice until video af is better.</p>
<p>But yeah, i&#8217;m sure we&#8217;re just at the beginning of all this and things will progress rapidly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bored</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/5d-mark-ii-firmware-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24596</link>
		<dc:creator>Bored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2550#comment-24596</guid>
		<description>Abou 1 million Liras</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abou 1 million Liras</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 02:57:44 -->
