<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7D Field Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-32491</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-32491</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciprian Trofin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-30586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciprian Trofin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-30586</guid>
		<description>I an very curious to find a reasonable explanation to the frame rate drop in low light conditions.

Forum links:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/823708/0
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=759335

Also mentioned in the mini review:
http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-eos-7d-mini-review/ (slowdown of the frame rate).

IMHO, the argument &quot;frame rate is sacrificed in favor of metering accuracy&quot; is deceiving because the slowdown is showing, also, in manual mode. Locking exposure works as a workaround. Manual mode (the equivalent to locking exposure) does not work.

I don&#039;t own a 7D. I&#039;d like one, but hidden flaws like this one is discouraging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I an very curious to find a reasonable explanation to the frame rate drop in low light conditions.</p>
<p>Forum links:<br />
<a href="http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/823708/0" rel="nofollow">http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/823708/0</a><br />
<a href="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=759335" rel="nofollow">http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=759335</a></p>
<p>Also mentioned in the mini review:<br />
<a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-eos-7d-mini-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-eos-7d-mini-review/</a> (slowdown of the frame rate).</p>
<p>IMHO, the argument &#8220;frame rate is sacrificed in favor of metering accuracy&#8221; is deceiving because the slowdown is showing, also, in manual mode. Locking exposure works as a workaround. Manual mode (the equivalent to locking exposure) does not work.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t own a 7D. I&#8217;d like one, but hidden flaws like this one is discouraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Fawcett</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26833</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Fawcett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26833</guid>
		<description>another 7d review
http://www.parkcameras.com/article/185/Canon-EOS-7D-Hands-on-Preview.html?referrer=newsletter

keep up the good work.
cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another 7d review<br />
<a href="http://www.parkcameras.com/article/185/Canon-EOS-7D-Hands-on-Preview.html?referrer=newsletter" rel="nofollow">http://www.parkcameras.com/article/185/Canon-EOS-7D-Hands-on-Preview.html?referrer=newsletter</a></p>
<p>keep up the good work.<br />
cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26648</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26648</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have bought a G11 as they added the swivel back but they left off the HD video, not spending that kinda money to not have at least 720p on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have bought a G11 as they added the swivel back but they left off the HD video, not spending that kinda money to not have at least 720p on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26646</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26646</guid>
		<description>Until recently the G6 was the was the wife&#039;s camera but I got her a Lumix ZS1. I honestly think the pictures from the G6 that is several years old look better but it is hard to argue with 12X zoom and HD video that can fit in your pocket. The G6 is still a bit large.

I have had no issues with the G6 swivel screen after almost 5 years and ~10,000 shots but have to admit it has spent 90% of its life in one position. 

My children are still quite young and rough. If the G6 could survive 1 month with them I would call it indestructible, but I am not confident enough to try. Instead it spends its time on a shelf usefully collecting dust.

There you have it. 2 case studies that together definitively prove swivel screens are not prone to failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until recently the G6 was the was the wife&#8217;s camera but I got her a Lumix ZS1. I honestly think the pictures from the G6 that is several years old look better but it is hard to argue with 12X zoom and HD video that can fit in your pocket. The G6 is still a bit large.</p>
<p>I have had no issues with the G6 swivel screen after almost 5 years and ~10,000 shots but have to admit it has spent 90% of its life in one position. </p>
<p>My children are still quite young and rough. If the G6 could survive 1 month with them I would call it indestructible, but I am not confident enough to try. Instead it spends its time on a shelf usefully collecting dust.</p>
<p>There you have it. 2 case studies that together definitively prove swivel screens are not prone to failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26608</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26608</guid>
		<description>Exactly. I have a 50D, great camera. I didnt suggest this because he wanted video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. I have a 50D, great camera. I didnt suggest this because he wanted video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26594</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26594</guid>
		<description>Blog comments? How is that authoritative on the issue? We have plenty of personal opinion right here. lol

Obviously the 7D is not as weather sealed as a 1D series. But to say it does not have weather sealing is just untrue. Look at the Canon link again, it even shows neat little pictures of the seals around the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog comments? How is that authoritative on the issue? We have plenty of personal opinion right here. lol</p>
<p>Obviously the 7D is not as weather sealed as a 1D series. But to say it does not have weather sealing is just untrue. Look at the Canon link again, it even shows neat little pictures of the seals around the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26592</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26592</guid>
		<description>OK, so 6.8 years still makes one very outdated camera. My G1 is 9 years old now, they&#039;re at G11 now, still works great even with its swivel screen. I dont use it anymore because my little SD500 beats the pants off it. 

However, both my kids use it, and it&#039;s become the kid camera of the family for the past 4 years. And you know how kids are, rough, it gets dropped, banged and treated much worse than I treated it...so you can quote engineering estimates at me all day long and if its 6 years or 55 years, the fact is having the swivel has not made the camera or any of my camcorders more prone to breaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so 6.8 years still makes one very outdated camera. My G1 is 9 years old now, they&#8217;re at G11 now, still works great even with its swivel screen. I dont use it anymore because my little SD500 beats the pants off it. </p>
<p>However, both my kids use it, and it&#8217;s become the kid camera of the family for the past 4 years. And you know how kids are, rough, it gets dropped, banged and treated much worse than I treated it&#8230;so you can quote engineering estimates at me all day long and if its 6 years or 55 years, the fact is having the swivel has not made the camera or any of my camcorders more prone to breaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kubelik</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26587</link>
		<dc:creator>kubelik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26587</guid>
		<description>what David said, or:

you could get the 50D.  I&#039;ve compared 50D shots against my friends&#039; 40Ds and my own 30D and there is nothing to suggest the 50D&#039;s image quality is inferior.

if you look at the 50D reviews on Amazon, they are hugely and overwhelmingly positive regarding its functionality and image quality.  the people I know who bought 50Ds and actively shoot with them also have no qualms about having done so.

if the 7D hadn&#039;t come out, or had been disappointing, I was ready to get a 50D myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what David said, or:</p>
<p>you could get the 50D.  I&#8217;ve compared 50D shots against my friends&#8217; 40Ds and my own 30D and there is nothing to suggest the 50D&#8217;s image quality is inferior.</p>
<p>if you look at the 50D reviews on Amazon, they are hugely and overwhelmingly positive regarding its functionality and image quality.  the people I know who bought 50Ds and actively shoot with them also have no qualms about having done so.</p>
<p>if the 7D hadn&#8217;t come out, or had been disappointing, I was ready to get a 50D myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26575</guid>
		<description>Well, try this link

http://photo.net/canon-eos-digital-camera-forum/00HFoM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, try this link</p>
<p><a href="http://photo.net/canon-eos-digital-camera-forum/00HFoM" rel="nofollow">http://photo.net/canon-eos-digital-camera-forum/00HFoM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26574</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26574</guid>
		<description>“After the 7D who the heck would want a 60D ?”

Any non-pro who does not want to spend a lot of money on features that are not all that important for a non-pro, amateur, “prosumer” user.  60D should be feature-poorer and cheaper version of 7D – no environmental sealing, no wireless flash trigger, perhaps lower res sensor, perhaps fewer video options, slower frame rate, all of those features are “extras” and you pay for them, I see no point paying for features that I’m not going to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“After the 7D who the heck would want a 60D ?”</p>
<p>Any non-pro who does not want to spend a lot of money on features that are not all that important for a non-pro, amateur, “prosumer” user.  60D should be feature-poorer and cheaper version of 7D – no environmental sealing, no wireless flash trigger, perhaps lower res sensor, perhaps fewer video options, slower frame rate, all of those features are “extras” and you pay for them, I see no point paying for features that I’m not going to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mucher</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26571</link>
		<dc:creator>mucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26571</guid>
		<description>Hello, friend. I think it this way: 

Let&#039;s do some maths.Open and close are 2 times. Say 8 times a day, because you will change angel things like that. If the rating of 20,000 times is correct and you use it everyday. It will be like 20,000/365/8=6.8(years) minus the bumping and squeezing it will take in travelling(like road transportation and by air)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, friend. I think it this way: </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s do some maths.Open and close are 2 times. Say 8 times a day, because you will change angel things like that. If the rating of 20,000 times is correct and you use it everyday. It will be like 20,000/365/8=6.8(years) minus the bumping and squeezing it will take in travelling(like road transportation and by air)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26562</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26562</guid>
		<description>If you dont need the extra 2 fps and 3 MP, I suspect the 60D will be a cleaner noise 15 MP with video in a 50D type of body, might wanna wait for it if you dont have the 7D funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you dont need the extra 2 fps and 3 MP, I suspect the 60D will be a cleaner noise 15 MP with video in a 50D type of body, might wanna wait for it if you dont have the 7D funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/7d-field-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26560</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2600#comment-26560</guid>
		<description>You heretic! How could you desecrate the High ISO Church with such blasphemy? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You heretic! How could you desecrate the High ISO Church with such blasphemy? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-11 07:03:42 -->
