<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon PowerShot S90 Sample Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maya Khoury</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-40169</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya Khoury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-40169</guid>
		<description>I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-32483</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-32483</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin8</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-27108</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-27108</guid>
		<description>Well, if it&#039;s a jpeg, they probably SHOULD make it punchy...so as to not mandate post-processing. Just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if it&#8217;s a jpeg, they probably SHOULD make it punchy&#8230;so as to not mandate post-processing. Just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26909</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26909</guid>
		<description>That wouldn&#039;t really make sense (low ISO vs high ISO isn&#039;t really a trade-off situation.) Much more likely is that they toned down the image processing to appeal more to professionals/serious amateurs, who can apply it in post if they want and generally dislike the excessive punch that the many consumer cams apply by default (which of course they do because many people like the high contrast look.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That wouldn&#8217;t really make sense (low ISO vs high ISO isn&#8217;t really a trade-off situation.) Much more likely is that they toned down the image processing to appeal more to professionals/serious amateurs, who can apply it in post if they want and generally dislike the excessive punch that the many consumer cams apply by default (which of course they do because many people like the high contrast look.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rox</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26890</link>
		<dc:creator>Rox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26890</guid>
		<description>Well, my SD400 do the same video recording... On my list for a compact, quality is for sure #1, but video as it&#039;S importance. S90 MKII (or whatever) should address that in the future... just hope 10MP will still be there (and not 12MP)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my SD400 do the same video recording&#8230; On my list for a compact, quality is for sure #1, but video as it&#8217;S importance. S90 MKII (or whatever) should address that in the future&#8230; just hope 10MP will still be there (and not 12MP)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kubelik</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26879</link>
		<dc:creator>kubelik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26879</guid>
		<description>agreed.  I wonder if they&#039;re weakening the lower ISOs in order to get better signal-noise ratio at the higher ISOs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.  I wonder if they&#8217;re weakening the lower ISOs in order to get better signal-noise ratio at the higher ISOs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kubelik</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26878</link>
		<dc:creator>kubelik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26878</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather have mid-boggling still images than HD video.  but I do respect that is a user preference thing, and it&#039;s a little odd when the video options are weaker than a camera not just one generation, but two generations older -- the G9 has better recording setups</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather have mid-boggling still images than HD video.  but I do respect that is a user preference thing, and it&#8217;s a little odd when the video options are weaker than a camera not just one generation, but two generations older &#8212; the G9 has better recording setups</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deedee</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26866</link>
		<dc:creator>deedee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26866</guid>
		<description>holy crapes..
i&#039;m really impressed.  iso1600 is really decent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy crapes..<br />
i&#8217;m really impressed.  iso1600 is really decent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26862</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26862</guid>
		<description>Funny, Ed, I was thinking the same thing.  I was looking at my 40D RAW 800 and 1250 ISO shots and thinking... hmmm...   But perhaps the noise handling with the new DIGIC 4 is very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, Ed, I was thinking the same thing.  I was looking at my 40D RAW 800 and 1250 ISO shots and thinking&#8230; hmmm&#8230;   But perhaps the noise handling with the new DIGIC 4 is very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afrank99</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26858</link>
		<dc:creator>afrank99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26858</guid>
		<description>To me the ISO 80 shots look like they could greatly benefit from some post-processing (sharpening, contrast) or more aggressive in-camera settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the ISO 80 shots look like they could greatly benefit from some post-processing (sharpening, contrast) or more aggressive in-camera settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rox</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26848</link>
		<dc:creator>Rox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26848</guid>
		<description>Someone said it&#039;s because of the sensor that is used... But I&#039;m with you, still not a good excuse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone said it&#8217;s because of the sensor that is used&#8230; But I&#8217;m with you, still not a good excuse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S50 Owner</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26847</link>
		<dc:creator>S50 Owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26847</guid>
		<description>High ISO looks great, but am I the only one super not wowed by the ISO 80 landscape shots? Gosh my old casios do just as well....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High ISO looks great, but am I the only one super not wowed by the ISO 80 landscape shots? Gosh my old casios do just as well&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26845</guid>
		<description>yeah, i agree and same for G11. Just don&#039;t understand why they excluded that feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i agree and same for G11. Just don&#8217;t understand why they excluded that feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Howland</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/canon-powershot-s90-sample-images/comment-page-1/#comment-26842</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Howland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2656#comment-26842</guid>
		<description>Never mind! One&#039;s at 1600 and one&#039;s at 3200. This is the same sensor as in the G11, right? Look&#039;s like my G10 is up for replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind! One&#8217;s at 1600 and one&#8217;s at 3200. This is the same sensor as in the G11, right? Look&#8217;s like my G10 is up for replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
