<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma releases 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-32501</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-32501</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habemus_Nigh-Kwon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-25938</link>
		<dc:creator>Habemus_Nigh-Kwon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-25938</guid>
		<description>Idiot, I wouldn&#039;t waste my time spoonfeeding you with knowledge I have gained by studying resources readily available on the Net. Like I said, read up a little before you expose your ignorance again. Your opinion is worth nothing unless you educate yourself first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiot, I wouldn&#8217;t waste my time spoonfeeding you with knowledge I have gained by studying resources readily available on the Net. Like I said, read up a little before you expose your ignorance again. Your opinion is worth nothing unless you educate yourself first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jweu</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24976</link>
		<dc:creator>jweu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24976</guid>
		<description>... and what is the answer of Canon to Nikon&#039;s 80-400 F/5.6 IS ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and what is the answer of Canon to Nikon&#8217;s 80-400 F/5.6 IS ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24911</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24911</guid>
		<description>&gt;Sigma don’t know how to make good glass.

You&#039;ve got to love the Internet and the anonymous trolls, it&#039;s so easy to show up and some forum and make an idiotic, baseless, sweeping statement like that.  Of course they don&#039;t know and people who think different and the thousands satisfied customers are just wrong:
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-30mm-f-1.4-EX-DC-HSM-Lens-Review.aspx
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/392-sigma_50_14_canon?start=2
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/299-sigma-af-50mm-f28-ex-macro-dg-test-report--review?start=2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Sigma don’t know how to make good glass.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got to love the Internet and the anonymous trolls, it&#8217;s so easy to show up and some forum and make an idiotic, baseless, sweeping statement like that.  Of course they don&#8217;t know and people who think different and the thousands satisfied customers are just wrong:<br />
<a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-30mm-f-1.4-EX-DC-HSM-Lens-Review.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-30mm-f-1.4-EX-DC-HSM-Lens-Review.aspx</a><br />
<a href="http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/392-sigma_50_14_canon?start=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/392-sigma_50_14_canon?start=2</a><br />
<a href="http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/299-sigma-af-50mm-f28-ex-macro-dg-test-report--review?start=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/299-sigma-af-50mm-f28-ex-macro-dg-test-report&#8211;review?start=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24907</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24907</guid>
		<description>I have asked you a direct question - please do explain why according to you (and you only) the current FF are not suitable for crop cameras.  Please do explain why would Canon want to release a top-notch, good quality lens as EF-S only mount that severly limits its sales.  Do not escape into firing cheap shots and hiding behind empty rhetoric.  You have made a statement, you have been challenged as to its accuracy so now answer the questions.  If you can, if not please just remain silent for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have asked you a direct question &#8211; please do explain why according to you (and you only) the current FF are not suitable for crop cameras.  Please do explain why would Canon want to release a top-notch, good quality lens as EF-S only mount that severly limits its sales.  Do not escape into firing cheap shots and hiding behind empty rhetoric.  You have made a statement, you have been challenged as to its accuracy so now answer the questions.  If you can, if not please just remain silent for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habemus_Nigh-Kwon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24891</link>
		<dc:creator>Habemus_Nigh-Kwon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24891</guid>
		<description>Oh, Johnny-boy, don&#039;t use the &quot;royal we&quot;, Michael without an E would get frothing mad at you. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Johnny-boy, don&#8217;t use the &#8220;royal we&#8221;, Michael without an E would get frothing mad at you. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habemus_Nigh-Kwon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24890</link>
		<dc:creator>Habemus_Nigh-Kwon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24890</guid>
		<description>Okay pompous Michael without an E, try reading more on Canon lens forums to get you up to date. While you&#039;re at it, read up a little on the differences between a wide-angle lens design and a normal lens design. Get back to me when you&#039;re sufficiently edified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay pompous Michael without an E, try reading more on Canon lens forums to get you up to date. While you&#8217;re at it, read up a little on the differences between a wide-angle lens design and a normal lens design. Get back to me when you&#8217;re sufficiently edified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bevvy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24869</link>
		<dc:creator>Bevvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24869</guid>
		<description>Sigma don&#039;t know how to make good glass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma don&#8217;t know how to make good glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikontocanon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24854</link>
		<dc:creator>nikontocanon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24854</guid>
		<description>any update on this?

http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-17-40-f4l-ii-cr3/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any update on this?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-17-40-f4l-ii-cr3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-17-40-f4l-ii-cr3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikontocanon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24852</link>
		<dc:creator>nikontocanon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24852</guid>
		<description>agree :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24849</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24849</guid>
		<description>Second that. it&#039;s an awesome lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second that. it&#8217;s an awesome lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24846</link>
		<dc:creator>John Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24846</guid>
		<description>I, for one, would like the next lens rumour to be regarding only the new 70-200mm 2.8L IS II. That is the lens we all want to hear about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, would like the next lens rumour to be regarding only the new 70-200mm 2.8L IS II. That is the lens we all want to hear about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24845</link>
		<dc:creator>John Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24845</guid>
		<description>Only two, you clown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only two, you clown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/sigma-releases-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24844</link>
		<dc:creator>John Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2556#comment-24844</guid>
		<description>Who cares about EF-S?

Answer: Nobody of significance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about EF-S?</p>
<p>Answer: Nobody of significance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 23:07:29 -->
