<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 VC Official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-32505</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-32505</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni Coppola</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-31560</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanni Coppola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-31560</guid>
		<description>I had the 28-300 VC a while ago and the IS on that was brilliant... supposed to be 4 stops and certainly seemed to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the 28-300 VC a while ago and the IS on that was brilliant&#8230; supposed to be 4 stops and certainly seemed to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuwatPo</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-30812</link>
		<dc:creator>SuwatPo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-30812</guid>
		<description>Vomel, 

The VC is about 4 stop which is very nice. I plan to buy it as well. Moreover, you can see some sample shot from this link as well for Tamron 17-50 review. www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vomel, </p>
<p>The VC is about 4 stop which is very nice. I plan to buy it as well. Moreover, you can see some sample shot from this link as well for Tamron 17-50 review. <a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vomel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-24478</link>
		<dc:creator>Vomel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-24478</guid>
		<description>Does anyone say how many stops of stabilization it will provide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone say how many stops of stabilization it will provide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-24435</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-24435</guid>
		<description>Amazon has preorder available for $649, not a bad price IMO

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-17-50mm-Vibration-Compensation-Digital/dp/B002LVUIXA/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1251939274&amp;sr=8-13</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon has preorder available for $649, not a bad price IMO</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-17-50mm-Vibration-Compensation-Digital/dp/B002LVUIXA/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1251939274&amp;sr=8-13" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-17-50mm-Vibration-Compensation-Digital/dp/B002LVUIXA/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1251939274&amp;sr=8-13</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-24221</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-24221</guid>
		<description>exactly!

I had it too, was happy with IQ, but &quot;upgraded&quot; to EF-S 17-55 because of IS and Ring-USM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly!</p>
<p>I had it too, was happy with IQ, but &#8220;upgraded&#8221; to EF-S 17-55 because of IS and Ring-USM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikontocanon</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-24182</link>
		<dc:creator>nikontocanon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-24182</guid>
		<description>Yes! Thank you Tamron!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! Thank you Tamron!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henk Van Oosterom</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-23916</link>
		<dc:creator>Henk Van Oosterom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-23916</guid>
		<description>there will be a Canon version in a few months</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there will be a Canon version in a few months</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfibanez</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-23914</link>
		<dc:creator>cfibanez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-23914</guid>
		<description>A Tamron lens with a Nikon mount .... who cares mate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Tamron lens with a Nikon mount &#8230;. who cares mate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Sherman</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-23910</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-23910</guid>
		<description>I had the (now) older version of this lens, was truly fantastic on the 20D. 

I wonder if this newer version is also coming was a new AF motor that isn&#039;t as noisy. It focused fast, but was pretty annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the (now) older version of this lens, was truly fantastic on the 20D. </p>
<p>I wonder if this newer version is also coming was a new AF motor that isn&#8217;t as noisy. It focused fast, but was pretty annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-23907</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-23907</guid>
		<description>Any idea on the price tag of this lens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea on the price tag of this lens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/comment-page-1/#comment-23897</link>
		<dc:creator>steve ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/tamron-17-50-f2-8-vc-official/#comment-23897</guid>
		<description>yes! lenses, lenses, lenses...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes! lenses, lenses, lenses&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
