Comments on: Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/ You gotta know Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:22:04 +0800 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Paul Smith Shoes http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-32493 Paul Smith Shoes Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:33:52 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-32493 Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets </a> and <a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter- buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good. Many people have alos become fans of Paul Smith Shoes since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like Paul Smith Wallets and <a Paul Smith Belts,It designs very good.

]]> By: Tom http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26774 Tom Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:04:56 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26774 I useually use f 5,6 - f 11 anyway som I don't care. Planing to buy one. I useually use f 5,6 – f 11 anyway som I don’t care. Planing to buy one.

]]> By: Tom http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26699 Tom Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:12:28 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26699 Quallity is expensive. There is plenty of cheap lenses out there allready. Quallity is expensive. There is plenty of cheap lenses out there allready.

]]> By: Tom http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26698 Tom Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:08:50 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26698 EF 16-35 f/2.8 and EF 24-70 f/2.8 is the most important reason why change to Nikon. Canon please! Everything is not about big white lenses.... EF 16-35 f/2.8 and EF 24-70 f/2.8 is the most important reason why change to Nikon. Canon please! Everything is not about big white lenses….

]]> By: Tom http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26696 Tom Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:03:35 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26696 According too Zeiss, both the 21 mm and the 18 mm are coming soon. According too Zeiss, both the 21 mm and the 18 mm are coming soon.

]]> By: The Return of Photo Related Links for September 17th - Thomas Fitzgerald Photography http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26585 The Return of Photo Related Links for September 17th - Thomas Fitzgerald Photography Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:02:05 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26585 [...] Zeiss launches an 18mm f/3.5 prime lens for Canon mount. While manual focus only, the legendary Zeiss optics should make this a powerful addition to any [...] [...] Zeiss launches an 18mm f/3.5 prime lens for Canon mount. While manual focus only, the legendary Zeiss optics should make this a powerful addition to any [...]

]]> By: Digital View Shop » Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE | Canon Rumors http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26315 Digital View Shop » Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE | Canon Rumors Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:55:06 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26315 [...] post: Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE | Canon Rumors rentacoder @ 9:17 am No [...] [...] post: Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE | Canon Rumors rentacoder @ 9:17 am No [...]

]]> By: jr http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26292 jr Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:57:29 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26292 ..you just forgot the fact that D3 remove CA with in camera processing.. ..you just forgot the fact that D3 remove CA with in camera processing..

]]> By: Paul http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26287 Paul Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:37:39 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26287 Please please PLEASE tell me you're not related to J.S. of last weeks infamy -_- 2 posts and you two sound the same. Please please PLEASE tell me you’re not related to J.S. of last weeks infamy -_-

2 posts and you two sound the same.

]]> By: Sherwin http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26271 Sherwin Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:24:24 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26271 The 10-22 is a better lens than any of the Canon FF wide-angle zoom lenses. That said, it sure would be nice to have a decent EF-S 10mm prime. The 10-22 is a better lens than any of the Canon FF wide-angle zoom lenses.

That said, it sure would be nice to have a decent EF-S 10mm prime.

]]> By: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE | Write What http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26266 Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE | Write What Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:31:17 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26266 [...] is the original: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE Tagged as: canon, canon-general, flickr, lenses, mac, macro, Photography, price, reputation No [...] [...] is the original: Canon Rumors » Blog Archive » Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE Tagged as: canon, canon-general, flickr, lenses, mac, macro, Photography, price, reputation No [...]

]]> By: Michal http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26264 Michal Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:04:53 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26264 "So you’re effectively saying the 16-35 f/2.8 is a good 20-35mm lens." I said no such thing, please do pay attention when reading. "The photozone test you’ve linked to uses an EOS 350D, which makes it completely meaningless for FF users." 1) FF users are a minority, 2) The OP never said he was using a FF camera 3) digital-picture has FF info as well http://the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=114 “So you’re effectively saying the 16-35 f/2.8 is a good 20-35mm lens.”

I said no such thing, please do pay attention when reading.

“The photozone test you’ve linked to uses an EOS 350D, which makes it completely meaningless for FF users.”

1) FF users are a minority, 2) The OP never said he was using a FF camera 3) digital-picture has FF info as well http://the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=114

]]> By: jweu http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26262 jweu Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:49:56 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26262 With a Zeiss lens you can see distorsion prior bying it. Why is Canon delivering this data to the EOS-software for correction of images but hiding this data to the eyes of there customers? Is there a program to display the image correction information used by canon software? Is there any plugin to correct the imlluminance and distorsion with photoshop? With a Zeiss lens you can see distorsion prior bying it. Why is Canon delivering this data to the EOS-software for correction of images but hiding this data to the eyes of there customers?

Is there a program to display the image correction information used by canon software?

Is there any plugin to correct the imlluminance and distorsion with photoshop?

]]> By: me http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/09/zeiss-distagon-t-3518-ze/comment-page-1/#comment-26261 me Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:37:19 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2596#comment-26261 yeah, when quality does not matter at all to you then you have the perfect solution. don't try to compare an aps-c cropped chip plus a zoom lens on the edge of it's focal lengs with a ff chip plus a prime lens.... yeah, when quality does not matter at all to you then you have the perfect solution. don’t try to compare an aps-c cropped chip plus a zoom lens on the edge of it’s focal lengs with a ff chip plus a prime lens….

]]>