Comments on: 1Ds Mark IV [CR1 & CR2]

By: John

John — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:51:10 +0000

All this conversation can be done with this note:

Shoot with whatever makes you happy and whatever makes you money. It’s nice to have money to spend in medium format cameras and who does not like that is because is a hater. Canon cameras are doing the job very fine. But nothing like the resolution and sharpness of a medium format.

Canon Mark III 1ds owner and Hassel owner

By: NissTrust

NissTrust — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:51:28 +0000

I think i have spotted the 1Ds MK IV at the Australian Tennis Open being tested by a staff photographer.

By: Jim Wilson

Jim Wilson — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:01:29 +0000

I shot Blads for most of my 30 years in commercial photography. I’ll have to confess to doing the math on a Hasselblad digital system every once in a while, but each time it makes less sense. Duplicating my analog Blad systems would cost $100K then, as a Pro, you need to have redundancy so another 100K for back ups. I regularly produce outstanding 60″ display prints with my 1Ds MKIII bodies and I’m sure the IV series cameras will only improve on what I get currently. I could be wrong, but I have serious doubts about the viability of companies like Hasselblad. How many $100,000 camera buyers are there out there? Pricing, combined with reliability issues, really makes Canon’s top of the line equipment very attractive.

By: Paul Smith Shoes

Paul Smith Shoes — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:20:08 +0000

Many people have alos become fans of Paul Smith Shoes since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like Paul Smith Wallets and Paul Smith Belts,It designs very good.

By: ALEK

ALEK — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:37:32 +0000

say before : 1Ds mark IV is for photo only, is not for me.

now correct: 1D mark IV is for photo only, is not for me.

sorry

By: Giovanni Coppola

Giovanni Coppola — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:12:13 +0000

Hi Kevin,

what planet are you on??? The 5DMk2 represents Canon’s best image quality at the moment and is better in all respects over the D700 including ISO/Noise performance, which when you think about it, is amazing given it has nearly double the pixels.

making a comment such ‘made from used scrap parts’ is just nonsense!

By: ALEK

ALEK — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:33:12 +0000

I want 1Ds MARK IV + digic V + RAW = beautiful !!!!!!!!
1Ds mark IV is for photo only, is not for me.

By: ALEK

ALEK — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:53:16 +0000

1Ds IV newwwwssssss !!!!!!! aggggggggggggggg!!!!! pleaseeee!!!!

By: ALEK

ALEK — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:52:54 +0000

1Ds IV newwwwssssss !!!!!!! aggggggggggggggg!!!!! pleaseeee!!!!

By: Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun

Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:30:47 +0000

Help! A Nikonian! ;)

By: Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun

Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:27:59 +0000

She, not he

By: Cardinal

Cardinal — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:59:27 +0000

The Pope speaks on the 1Ds4:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=33548724

By: gabe

gabe — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:52:55 +0000

minimal distorsion? here it is

http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/165-canon-ts-e-90mm-f28-lab-test-report–review?start=1

i know i know its apsc, but its more then nothing.

0% :DDD even if its cause of the wrong measurement, the margin of error i think is still small, so even if its not perfect, its almost.

other good alternatives are the two 85mm

By: pure

pure — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:33:36 +0000

could you explain what a “medium format camera” is? it seems that the 5d mkii is the top of the line, and not some “medium” (if anything, it should be high -end because of the FF