<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: October 20, 2009 &#8211; 50 Years of Canon SLR.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:05:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-32448</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-32448</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29504</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29504</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s already October 20th in Australia and there is no word yet. They really know how to keep a secret</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s already October 20th in Australia and there is no word yet. They really know how to keep a secret</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam West</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29477</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29477</guid>
		<description>I think that is new canon rangefinder camera.. Buahaa!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is new canon rangefinder camera.. Buahaa!! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason is Bourne</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason is Bourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29458</guid>
		<description>A marketing perspective...

50 years is pretty big deal.
From a marketing stand point I would not expect Canon to pass up this opportunity to realease some pretty significant gear.
The Canon people have been sworn to secrecy...but even then there has been some low level mumbling of a new camera and a few new high-end lenses.
Don&#039;t be surprised by a new video camera either.
This party is designed to really knock some shoes off.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A marketing perspective&#8230;</p>
<p>50 years is pretty big deal.<br />
From a marketing stand point I would not expect Canon to pass up this opportunity to realease some pretty significant gear.<br />
The Canon people have been sworn to secrecy&#8230;but even then there has been some low level mumbling of a new camera and a few new high-end lenses.<br />
Don&#8217;t be surprised by a new video camera either.<br />
This party is designed to really knock some shoes off&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29284</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29284</guid>
		<description>The lack of any good leaks on the new camera at this point in time has me thinking that the Oct 20 event will not be so eventful, at least not in the way of a new camera introduction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of any good leaks on the new camera at this point in time has me thinking that the Oct 20 event will not be so eventful, at least not in the way of a new camera introduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29257</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29257</guid>
		<description>My guess is that this same camera was about to be announced on September 29th (remember that spectacular product in the big red box that never materialized). It was pushed back to see what Nikon had in the D3s and take the wind out of their sails with a killer 1D mark IV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that this same camera was about to be announced on September 29th (remember that spectacular product in the big red box that never materialized). It was pushed back to see what Nikon had in the D3s and take the wind out of their sails with a killer 1D mark IV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29245</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29245</guid>
		<description>totally useleess and ridiculus.

no other company use this format ! in Nikon all sport shooter are happy with their full frame.

there is no lens designed for this crop factor ! on my full frame my 16-35 and 24-70 are really good focal range. but my 24-70 is not very helpfull on my 1D2 i&#039;m always not enough wide !

personnally i would prefer a full frame of 15mp or 18mp and just crop in post after !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally useleess and ridiculus.</p>
<p>no other company use this format ! in Nikon all sport shooter are happy with their full frame.</p>
<p>there is no lens designed for this crop factor ! on my full frame my 16-35 and 24-70 are really good focal range. but my 24-70 is not very helpfull on my 1D2 i&#8217;m always not enough wide !</p>
<p>personnally i would prefer a full frame of 15mp or 18mp and just crop in post after !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nogginthenog</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29240</link>
		<dc:creator>Nogginthenog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29240</guid>
		<description>The 7D has the lowest read noise of ANY crop sensor amera yet made.

Including the D300/D300s.



Thus its fair to say that they can achieve the same with 1.3 crop.

15Mp or so 1d4 will likely have noise performance on a par with the 12Mp D3s, but with higher framerates, better video implimentation and likely a lower pricepoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 7D has the lowest read noise of ANY crop sensor amera yet made.</p>
<p>Including the D300/D300s.</p>
<p>Thus its fair to say that they can achieve the same with 1.3 crop.</p>
<p>15Mp or so 1d4 will likely have noise performance on a par with the 12Mp D3s, but with higher framerates, better video implimentation and likely a lower pricepoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29236</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29236</guid>
		<description>well, with canon, marketing dept plays a very huge role in product specs. either they could&#039;ve stayed with same sensor and improved the ISO or increase MPs and compromise high ISO quality. they chose the second option for better product segmentation and to avoid 5d MKII users getting furious about a crop camera having better specs and better low ISO.

After all, canon decided that 7d must not have more than 3 AEB and af point linked spot meterering, as they are supposed to be PRO features and should be only in 1d series</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, with canon, marketing dept plays a very huge role in product specs. either they could&#8217;ve stayed with same sensor and improved the ISO or increase MPs and compromise high ISO quality. they chose the second option for better product segmentation and to avoid 5d MKII users getting furious about a crop camera having better specs and better low ISO.</p>
<p>After all, canon decided that 7d must not have more than 3 AEB and af point linked spot meterering, as they are supposed to be PRO features and should be only in 1d series</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29235</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29235</guid>
		<description>corporate security? may be true for end users but both company would have insiders giving them the specs and upcoming products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>corporate security? may be true for end users but both company would have insiders giving them the specs and upcoming products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mucher</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29234</link>
		<dc:creator>mucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29234</guid>
		<description>Nikon D3s is boring....yawnnnn....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon D3s is boring&#8230;.yawnnnn&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29231</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29231</guid>
		<description>sounds reasonable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds reasonable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29230</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29230</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see a 50 1.2II L. I&#039;d be first in line to buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a 50 1.2II L. I&#8217;d be first in line to buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/october-20-2009-50-years-of-canon-slr/comment-page-1/#comment-29227</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2864#comment-29227</guid>
		<description>The 20th is very close...at this point I&#039;d start to expect some leaks regarding any new camera release on that date.

Now some rumors have pointed to a new camera announcement on the 20th but not actually making the product available until early next year.  In essence, this would be Canon moving up the announcement, presumably to take some thunder away from Nikon&#039;s new D3s release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 20th is very close&#8230;at this point I&#8217;d start to expect some leaks regarding any new camera release on that date.</p>
<p>Now some rumors have pointed to a new camera announcement on the 20th but not actually making the product available until early next year.  In essence, this would be Canon moving up the announcement, presumably to take some thunder away from Nikon&#8217;s new D3s release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
