<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1D Mark IV White Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:22:04 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClieceQueek</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-47520</link>
		<dc:creator>ClieceQueek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-47520</guid>
		<description>Ух, сколько коментариев то тут набрасали. Ну отмечусь и я-пост бомба..так держать, молодцом автор!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ух, сколько коментариев то тут набрасали. Ну отмечусь и я-пост бомба..так держать, молодцом автор!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-32661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-32661</guid>
		<description>That means &quot;funny&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That means &#8220;funny&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Медик Лекарь</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-32543</link>
		<dc:creator>Медик Лекарь</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-32543</guid>
		<description>Забавно )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Забавно )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smith Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-32414</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smith Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-32414</guid>
		<description>Many people have alos become fans of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Shoes&lt;/a&gt; since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Paul Smith Wallets  &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-

buckle-p-21559.html&quot;&gt;Paul Smith Belts&lt;/a&gt;,It designs very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have alos become fans of <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html" rel="nofollow">Paul Smith Shoes</a> since they came into the market. I also one of them , I very like <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html" rel="nofollow"> Paul Smith Wallets  </a> and &lt;a <a href="http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-belt-multi-stripe-100-leather-100-pewter-</p>
<p>buckle-p-21559.html">Paul Smith Belts</a>,It designs very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorkage</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31989</link>
		<dc:creator>dorkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31989</guid>
		<description>My take is there&#039;s a 1 stop improvement via the sensor and 1 stop improvement via dual Digic 4 procs. These are both over the 1Dm3 (not the 1Ds!)

So vs. the 5Dm2 or 1Ds, probably 0.5-1 stop RAW and 1.5-2 stops VIDEO &amp; JPG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take is there&#8217;s a 1 stop improvement via the sensor and 1 stop improvement via dual Digic 4 procs. These are both over the 1Dm3 (not the 1Ds!)</p>
<p>So vs. the 5Dm2 or 1Ds, probably 0.5-1 stop RAW and 1.5-2 stops VIDEO &amp; JPG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31983</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fun reading material! *snore*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fun reading material! *snore*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31982</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31982</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re quite similar in more ways than one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re quite similar in more ways than one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spam</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31944</link>
		<dc:creator>spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31944</guid>
		<description>5D Mk II is already slightly better than 1Ds Mk II in some areas, giving it better AF would make it even more difficult to sell the 1Ds Mk III, and even the 1D Mk IV for those who need the best high Iso and good AF, but not really high frame rate and 1D-build quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5D Mk II is already slightly better than 1Ds Mk II in some areas, giving it better AF would make it even more difficult to sell the 1Ds Mk III, and even the 1D Mk IV for those who need the best high Iso and good AF, but not really high frame rate and 1D-build quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31939</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31939</guid>
		<description>God knows why the 5d was released with such a crap AF... Yeah the White papers are boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God knows why the 5d was released with such a crap AF&#8230; Yeah the White papers are boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVID PR</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31932</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVID PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31932</guid>
		<description>o no 
Rumor: Nikon D4 in primary field trials
By [NR] admin &#124; November 14, 2009


This comment about a Nikon D4 camera being currently field tested was posted on the d-spot.co.il forum by an active user (with 821 previous posts if this is an indication of anything):

“Initial Information I received from a senior Nikon position in the USA, that Nikon D4 is already under primary field trial .FF sensor with 18 million pixels, Full HD-quality video as in Canon.
Frame Rate Of 10 images per second, 102,400 Asa quality similar to what today is Asa 25,600 in Nikon D3S. Improving the quality of the existing D3s by two stops.
Most important information: a completely new Autofocus sensor that will
enable outstanding autofocus performance. From what I understand, this is a real breakthrough Technology.
I was not told when the camera is expected to reach the market and what will be its price.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>o no<br />
Rumor: Nikon D4 in primary field trials<br />
By [NR] admin | November 14, 2009</p>
<p>This comment about a Nikon D4 camera being currently field tested was posted on the d-spot.co.il forum by an active user (with 821 previous posts if this is an indication of anything):</p>
<p>“Initial Information I received from a senior Nikon position in the USA, that Nikon D4 is already under primary field trial .FF sensor with 18 million pixels, Full HD-quality video as in Canon.<br />
Frame Rate Of 10 images per second, 102,400 Asa quality similar to what today is Asa 25,600 in Nikon D3S. Improving the quality of the existing D3s by two stops.<br />
Most important information: a completely new Autofocus sensor that will<br />
enable outstanding autofocus performance. From what I understand, this is a real breakthrough Technology.<br />
I was not told when the camera is expected to reach the market and what will be its price.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31892</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31892</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say how much I appreciate you keeping this site up and running.  The link for the forum blog post was broken, so I thought I&#039;d leave it here for you.  I know how hard it is to keep something like this going, you&#039;re doing a great service for all us Canon Geeks.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say how much I appreciate you keeping this site up and running.  The link for the forum blog post was broken, so I thought I&#8217;d leave it here for you.  I know how hard it is to keep something like this going, you&#8217;re doing a great service for all us Canon Geeks.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exit_level</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31891</link>
		<dc:creator>exit_level</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31891</guid>
		<description>I did the same as you but with the 7D. Let them issue some more firmware improvements. I don&#039;t expect them to admit to some hardware alterations. In the end of January everything should be okay. Then I can treat seriously the reviews and partial tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the same as you but with the 7D. Let them issue some more firmware improvements. I don&#8217;t expect them to admit to some hardware alterations. In the end of January everything should be okay. Then I can treat seriously the reviews and partial tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31885</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31885</guid>
		<description>hm thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-31884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040#comment-31884</guid>
		<description>I read thru about 75% of it, I kept drifting off to sleep, so I didn&#039;t retain all that much.  I was and am very interested in the high iso noise performance, they say it is about 1 stop better than the 1D MK III, they also attribute a additional one stop for those who use jpeg images due to the processing done by the digic 4 versus digic 3.  For those who shoot raw, its a one stop improvement according to what I gleaned from it.  The camera does have two additional stops of high iso settings, so that is a little confusing.  

I tend to doubt if its more than 1/2 stop better than the 5D MK II after reading the sensor portion of the white paper.  Maybe someone else can read it without nodding off and tell us what their interpretation is. 

It is good sales material.  I cancelled my order last week because there is so little information from Canon and there are no credible reviews or sample images that are carefully shot.

I want to believe its a big step up, but I&#039;ll wait and see before plunking $5,000 down.  There will be small discounts and lower prices in a few months as well, at least to those who know how to find them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read thru about 75% of it, I kept drifting off to sleep, so I didn&#8217;t retain all that much.  I was and am very interested in the high iso noise performance, they say it is about 1 stop better than the 1D MK III, they also attribute a additional one stop for those who use jpeg images due to the processing done by the digic 4 versus digic 3.  For those who shoot raw, its a one stop improvement according to what I gleaned from it.  The camera does have two additional stops of high iso settings, so that is a little confusing.  </p>
<p>I tend to doubt if its more than 1/2 stop better than the 5D MK II after reading the sensor portion of the white paper.  Maybe someone else can read it without nodding off and tell us what their interpretation is. </p>
<p>It is good sales material.  I cancelled my order last week because there is so little information from Canon and there are no credible reviews or sample images that are carefully shot.</p>
<p>I want to believe its a big step up, but I&#8217;ll wait and see before plunking $5,000 down.  There will be small discounts and lower prices in a few months as well, at least to those who know how to find them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
