Comments on: PowerShots – A2100 Done http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/ You gotta know Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: yvesson http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33344 yvesson Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:37:26 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33344 Hej, and also for CHDK, it's better to have manual modes and the dials and buttons which go with them. Most compact cams are clones atm, canon could offer something different with the old-style powershots. I wish they rename the A1x00 and A2x00 something else than powershot. Hej, and also for CHDK, it’s better to have manual modes and the dials and buttons which go with them.
Most compact cams are clones atm, canon could offer something different with the old-style powershots.
I wish they rename the A1x00 and A2x00 something else than powershot.

]]> By: Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33305 Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:20:06 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33305 We have yet to see anyone come out with a PRO camera with 1080p (except Canon), so they needn't yet worry. Nikon is stubbornly sticking to its 720p/24 strategy. So is Pentax. The only "SLR" other than Canon that shoots 1080p (at 24fps) is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1. We have yet to see anyone come out with a PRO camera with 1080p (except Canon), so they needn’t yet worry.

Nikon is stubbornly sticking to its 720p/24 strategy.

So is Pentax.

The only “SLR” other than Canon that shoots 1080p (at 24fps) is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1.

]]> By: Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33302 Jacobin Ve Lardina Saccun Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:16:06 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33302 I think you mean "seppuku" (or "hara-kiri"). I think you mean “seppuku” (or “hara-kiri”).

]]> By: wuwei http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33235 wuwei Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:56:09 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33235 I think Canon should DEFINITELY upgrade the 500D and SOON. That "crippled" 1080p at a pathetic 20fps is going to REALLY hurt them sales wise as Nikon and the other competition start releasing consumer DSLRs with FULL 1080p video. Other than that the 500D is fine. But trust me, the lack of true HD video is gonna hurt this model sooner than later. If Canon TRULY wants to trump Nikon, they SHOULD come out with a consumer entry level FF camera. Not a $3499 3D. WTF is that??? WHY would they come out with a MORE expensive consumer FF than the 5D??? It DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE. LOL. No. If Canon wants to hit it out of the park, and BLOW away the competition, an AFFORDABLE entry level FF DSLR would be a REAL game changer. If they made the next 500D or the 60D a low cost sub $2000 FF camera for the masses, it would be AWESOME. I think Canon should DEFINITELY upgrade the 500D and SOON. That “crippled” 1080p at a pathetic 20fps is going to REALLY hurt them sales wise as Nikon and the other competition start releasing consumer DSLRs with FULL 1080p video.

Other than that the 500D is fine. But trust me, the lack of true HD video is gonna hurt this model sooner than later.

If Canon TRULY wants to trump Nikon, they SHOULD come out with a consumer entry level FF camera. Not a $3499 3D. WTF is that??? WHY would they come out with a MORE expensive consumer FF than the 5D??? It DOESN’T MAKE ANY SENSE. LOL.

No. If Canon wants to hit it out of the park, and BLOW away the competition, an AFFORDABLE entry level FF DSLR would be a REAL game changer.

If they made the next 500D or the 60D a low cost sub $2000 FF camera for the masses, it would be AWESOME.

]]> By: Michal http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33081 Michal Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:57:14 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33081 Please feel free to show me reviews from reputable sources that are critical of those camers. Please feel free to show me reviews from reputable sources that are critical of those camers.

]]> By: qazsen http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33079 qazsen Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:17:36 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33079 Please don't confuse facts with reviews on sites whose income comes from click-through commissions. Please don’t confuse facts with reviews on sites whose income comes from click-through commissions.

]]> By: ano http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33078 ano Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:00:26 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33078 The A1000 & A2000 may be good cameras, but they don't fit very well in a lineup, kinda like GM's pontiac & oldsmobile divisions. They were capable cars, but being squeezed from different lineups. Without manual controls, people might as well get the SD line which are sleeker and now fairly affordable. And the more advanced photographers want the SX, S, or G lines. So that left the A line without a home. The A1000 & A2000 may be good cameras, but they don’t fit very well in a lineup, kinda like GM’s pontiac & oldsmobile divisions. They were capable cars, but being squeezed from different lineups. Without manual controls, people might as well get the SD line which are sleeker and now fairly affordable. And the more advanced photographers want the SX, S, or G lines. So that left the A line without a home.

]]> By: Michal http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33077 Michal Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:41:21 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33077 "owerShot A1000 and A2000 series was a mistake." Please do not confuse your own opinions with facts and reviews of other people who are more qualified to judge cameras than you are. http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_A2000_IS/verdict.shtml http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3798&review=canon+powershot+a1000 Both series were generally well regarded. “owerShot A1000 and A2000 series was a mistake.”

Please do not confuse your own opinions with facts and reviews of other people who are more qualified to judge cameras than you are.

http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_A2000_IS/verdict.shtml

http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3798&review=canon+powershot+a1000

Both series were generally well regarded.

]]> By: qazsen http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33073 qazsen Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:04:45 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33073 PowerShot A1000 and A2000 series was a mistake. Canon should revive the good old PowerShot A series with P/Av/Tv/M controls and 1/1.8" sensors. PowerShot A1000 and A2000 series was a mistake. Canon should revive the good old PowerShot A series with P/Av/Tv/M controls and 1/1.8″ sensors.

]]> By: Nick http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33070 Nick Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:17:05 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33070 ::commits Seppu Kai:: ::commits Seppu Kai::

]]> By: yvesson http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33068 yvesson Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:25:53 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33068 Hej, All they have to do is revive the old powershot line. But they won't do it. Hej, All they have to do is revive the old powershot line. But they won’t do it.

]]> By: David http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/powershots/comment-page-1/#comment-33060 David Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:04:17 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3080#comment-33060 OMG NO, NOT THE A2100!!! hehe OMG NO, NOT THE A2100!!!

hehe

]]>