<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerShot GX1 [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: canon fan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-34682</link>
		<dc:creator>canon fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-34682</guid>
		<description>Canon is the best quality in digital compact camera
my farovite is sx 120 is
maybe in 2010  nex generation of sx 130 is??
with digic 5?
please canon moor new compact camera power shot series
in 2010 year
happy christman for even foto fan/

my mail
fotoartysta@wp.pl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon is the best quality in digital compact camera<br />
my farovite is sx 120 is<br />
maybe in 2010  nex generation of sx 130 is??<br />
with digic 5?<br />
please canon moor new compact camera power shot series<br />
in 2010 year<br />
happy christman for even foto fan/</p>
<p>my mail<br />
<a href="mailto:fotoartysta@wp.pl">fotoartysta@wp.pl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moetaka</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-34059</link>
		<dc:creator>moetaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-34059</guid>
		<description>キヤノンデジカメ事業から撤退。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>キヤノンデジカメ事業から撤退。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsb</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-34041</link>
		<dc:creator>jsb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-34041</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I really hope that Canon can lower G10&#039;s CCD voltage and increase its frequency to 16mhz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I really hope that Canon can lower G10&#8242;s CCD voltage and increase its frequency to 16mhz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catastrophile</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33931</link>
		<dc:creator>Catastrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33931</guid>
		<description>GX1 is an old recycled rumor first appeared before the G10 (or was it G9, am not sure). I believe it&#039;s false this time round as well. 

It is very hard for all manufacturers (except for Fuji &amp; Panasonic maybe) to make (at house) better tiny sensors than what they can buy from Sony in terms of (costs &amp; performance). It was probably a bad move from Canon to try make their own compact sensors, they can try hard as Panasonic did for years when their compacts were known to be excellent except for horrible noise compared to the competition (as was the case with FZ30/50, lately with  cameras like LX3 the problem is finally under control).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GX1 is an old recycled rumor first appeared before the G10 (or was it G9, am not sure). I believe it&#8217;s false this time round as well. </p>
<p>It is very hard for all manufacturers (except for Fuji &amp; Panasonic maybe) to make (at house) better tiny sensors than what they can buy from Sony in terms of (costs &amp; performance). It was probably a bad move from Canon to try make their own compact sensors, they can try hard as Panasonic did for years when their compacts were known to be excellent except for horrible noise compared to the competition (as was the case with FZ30/50, lately with  cameras like LX3 the problem is finally under control).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33863</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 06:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33863</guid>
		<description>This could be the much awaited answer to the panny GH1. I still don&#039;t think Canon will create another mount and their answer to m4/3 will be something like the sx series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be the much awaited answer to the panny GH1. I still don&#8217;t think Canon will create another mount and their answer to m4/3 will be something like the sx series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Bronson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33837</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33837</guid>
		<description>It makes for conversation. The rating is so you can take it with a grain of salt. It&#039;s CanonRumors, not CanonFacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes for conversation. The rating is so you can take it with a grain of salt. It&#8217;s CanonRumors, not CanonFacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33826</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33826</guid>
		<description>What exactly is a point of &quot;CR1&quot; rumor?  &quot;New source, never heard from them before&quot; so basically any fanboi or dreamer can have his wet dreams posted, great, makes huge sense.  Lift your game CanonRumours, those sort of &quot;rumors&quot; really hurt what is left of the credibility of this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is a point of &#8220;CR1&#8243; rumor?  &#8220;New source, never heard from them before&#8221; so basically any fanboi or dreamer can have his wet dreams posted, great, makes huge sense.  Lift your game CanonRumours, those sort of &#8220;rumors&#8221; really hurt what is left of the credibility of this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33823</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33823</guid>
		<description>Could this be the same camera that was being referred to in the rumour a while back about a replacement for the Canon PowerShot Pro1, I wonder?  Put the electronics of the G11 into an SX1 body/lens setup and slap a red ring on the barrel...  I&#039;d certainly be interested in that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be the same camera that was being referred to in the rumour a while back about a replacement for the Canon PowerShot Pro1, I wonder?  Put the electronics of the G11 into an SX1 body/lens setup and slap a red ring on the barrel&#8230;  I&#8217;d certainly be interested in that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobo</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33820</link>
		<dc:creator>bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33820</guid>
		<description>100% agree with that. 18MP will be disappointing for me too. MP decreasing + better ISO noise reduction will be fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree with that. 18MP will be disappointing for me too. MP decreasing + better ISO noise reduction will be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Bronson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33819</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33819</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%. 15 or 12 MP would be ideal for me personally. 

If they boost it to 18MP I&#039;ll be disappointed and may not buy it, as it won&#039;t be ideal for shooting landscapes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%. 15 or 12 MP would be ideal for me personally. </p>
<p>If they boost it to 18MP I&#8217;ll be disappointed and may not buy it, as it won&#8217;t be ideal for shooting landscapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Bronson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33818</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33818</guid>
		<description>The point would be the huge price difference for starters. Not everyone needs or would want to pay more for the extras the 7D gives you. Beyond the larger viewfinder, there&#039;s isn&#039;t too much the 7D offers me for shooting landscapes to justify a purchase. The 5D would be great, but it&#039;s much more than I&#039;m willing to pay for a camera right now. 

So the only logical upgrade from my 450D would be the 50D, which I&#039;m not willing to buy as I&#039;m disappointed in it&#039;s high ISO performance. Especially compared to the newer T1i. So now I&#039;m waiting on the 60D. I do hope they stick to the 15MP sensor though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point would be the huge price difference for starters. Not everyone needs or would want to pay more for the extras the 7D gives you. Beyond the larger viewfinder, there&#8217;s isn&#8217;t too much the 7D offers me for shooting landscapes to justify a purchase. The 5D would be great, but it&#8217;s much more than I&#8217;m willing to pay for a camera right now. </p>
<p>So the only logical upgrade from my 450D would be the 50D, which I&#8217;m not willing to buy as I&#8217;m disappointed in it&#8217;s high ISO performance. Especially compared to the newer T1i. So now I&#8217;m waiting on the 60D. I do hope they stick to the 15MP sensor though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33817</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33817</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a bit reckless to assume that we will not see another xxD because we haven&#039;t seen any rumors lately!   

Personally, I would like an xxD with a 15 MP chip (12 would be fine) incorporating some of the sensor technologies seen on the 7D, and still using the CF card format.   Canon mentioned that these technologies would be filtering through the EOS line-up.    Hopefully that includes a future xxD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a bit reckless to assume that we will not see another xxD because we haven&#8217;t seen any rumors lately!   </p>
<p>Personally, I would like an xxD with a 15 MP chip (12 would be fine) incorporating some of the sensor technologies seen on the 7D, and still using the CF card format.   Canon mentioned that these technologies would be filtering through the EOS line-up.    Hopefully that includes a future xxD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobo</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33816</link>
		<dc:creator>bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33816</guid>
		<description>No thanks, i want a new body with full guarantee. Older lenses - no problem for me, but body a want new. Anyway thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks, i want a new body with full guarantee. Older lenses &#8211; no problem for me, but body a want new. Anyway thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/powershot-gx1-cr1/comment-page-1/#comment-33814</link>
		<dc:creator>johnjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3132#comment-33814</guid>
		<description>Seriously, wait, save some more $$$ and buy a 7D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, wait, save some more $$$ and buy a 7D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 15:56:18 -->
