<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mythical EOS 3D [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch Supernatural</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-47018</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Supernatural</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-47018</guid>
		<description>Great post, I wonder how much you like movies?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I wonder how much you like movies?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inst</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-37295</link>
		<dc:creator>Inst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-37295</guid>
		<description>Oh, before I go back to the future, just have to remind you of something. It turns out that Canon&#039;s legendary Q&amp;A issues popped up. In about 30% of 1des, which happens to be a production run of 1000, mind you, the IR filter malfunctions and blocks all incoming light, rendering the camera useless. It&#039;s your fault for trying to shoot through women&#039;s clothes, dear.

The new firmware is also pretty faulty; the system locks up and displays a Red Screen of Death (TM) every once in a while, and about 20% of electronic viewfinders have over 100 dead pixels.

When you shoot at full speed, there is a chance that the camera will overheat and fry the electronics. In this case, your Canon warranty does apply and you can have the camera repaired for a small fee of $10,000.

There have been reports that the chassis is defective and sheds particles into the sensor compartment. Be careful while using the sensor cleaning function, as people have lost fingers to the mirror.

Also, as the dollar has collapsed in the past few years, while the yen has remained resilient, the price of $35000 is no longer accurate and is now $3.5 million, which is also the price of a Toyota Camry. For Europeans, don&#039;t be smug, as the Euro has collapsed and your currency is now preferred firewood, which is good since the Russians have cut off gas exports.

Regarding the 2000D, if the camera detects that, aside from the kit lens, that the lens being used has never been used on another camera, of at least 7D quality, the camera will refuse to click the shutter. The shutter life of the camera is now 5,000 pictures, after which you will have to buy a new camera as Canon refuses to service your 2000D, finding it too cheap.

And one last thing:

Nikon now has camera implants that tap into your optical nerve and can capture whatever you see. This results in a monumental improvement on dynamic range, as the human eye is about 1000 or so stops ahead of the average DSLR. Low-light performance is also adequate, although it is generally quite noisy. Tonal quality is superb, and the files generated are vector graphics, typically between 5 and 14 megabytes in size.

Polygamy is now legal and every purchase of the O3 implant comes with a free trophy wife. If you are not attracted to women, don&#039;t worry, they have highly effective pills for that, which do not have a permanent effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, before I go back to the future, just have to remind you of something. It turns out that Canon&#8217;s legendary Q&amp;A issues popped up. In about 30% of 1des, which happens to be a production run of 1000, mind you, the IR filter malfunctions and blocks all incoming light, rendering the camera useless. It&#8217;s your fault for trying to shoot through women&#8217;s clothes, dear.</p>
<p>The new firmware is also pretty faulty; the system locks up and displays a Red Screen of Death (TM) every once in a while, and about 20% of electronic viewfinders have over 100 dead pixels.</p>
<p>When you shoot at full speed, there is a chance that the camera will overheat and fry the electronics. In this case, your Canon warranty does apply and you can have the camera repaired for a small fee of $10,000.</p>
<p>There have been reports that the chassis is defective and sheds particles into the sensor compartment. Be careful while using the sensor cleaning function, as people have lost fingers to the mirror.</p>
<p>Also, as the dollar has collapsed in the past few years, while the yen has remained resilient, the price of $35000 is no longer accurate and is now $3.5 million, which is also the price of a Toyota Camry. For Europeans, don&#8217;t be smug, as the Euro has collapsed and your currency is now preferred firewood, which is good since the Russians have cut off gas exports.</p>
<p>Regarding the 2000D, if the camera detects that, aside from the kit lens, that the lens being used has never been used on another camera, of at least 7D quality, the camera will refuse to click the shutter. The shutter life of the camera is now 5,000 pictures, after which you will have to buy a new camera as Canon refuses to service your 2000D, finding it too cheap.</p>
<p>And one last thing:</p>
<p>Nikon now has camera implants that tap into your optical nerve and can capture whatever you see. This results in a monumental improvement on dynamic range, as the human eye is about 1000 or so stops ahead of the average DSLR. Low-light performance is also adequate, although it is generally quite noisy. Tonal quality is superb, and the files generated are vector graphics, typically between 5 and 14 megabytes in size.</p>
<p>Polygamy is now legal and every purchase of the O3 implant comes with a free trophy wife. If you are not attracted to women, don&#8217;t worry, they have highly effective pills for that, which do not have a permanent effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inst</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-37286</link>
		<dc:creator>Inst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-37286</guid>
		<description>Canon 1de Mark 1

Full frame.
48 Megapixels.
10 fps
Dual DIGIC V
In-body image stabilization, with extra connectors allowing it to support IS II, which has the lens communicate with the camera so that you can achieve 8 stops of image stabilization.
No AA filter
esraw, emraw, elraw with pixel binning at 12, 16, and 32 megapixels, allowing for high quality ISO 51200 and ISO 102400. Macro-binning system also reduces the effect of diffraction limited aperture on picture sharpness.
Highly enhanced SnR ratio allows for ISO usable iso 25600.

LIVE (Lens Interchangeable, Viefinder Electronic) system allows for the body to be the size and weight of a 5d Mark 2.

Enhanced 73 point AF system allows for improved autofocus, with modes enabled in the movie mode to allow for better control of the autofocus.

Electronic IR filter allows you to take IR photographs at handheld speeds, but does not hamper visible light photography with the IR filter electronically activated.

The sole caveat? This camera costs $35000 a pop to make up for the R&amp;D costs.

Canon 2000D

9 spot AF.
8 megapixels
Modern high ISO reduction design allows for usable 6400 ISO.
640x480 movie mode at 30 FPS.

Sells for $500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon 1de Mark 1</p>
<p>Full frame.<br />
48 Megapixels.<br />
10 fps<br />
Dual DIGIC V<br />
In-body image stabilization, with extra connectors allowing it to support IS II, which has the lens communicate with the camera so that you can achieve 8 stops of image stabilization.<br />
No AA filter<br />
esraw, emraw, elraw with pixel binning at 12, 16, and 32 megapixels, allowing for high quality ISO 51200 and ISO 102400. Macro-binning system also reduces the effect of diffraction limited aperture on picture sharpness.<br />
Highly enhanced SnR ratio allows for ISO usable iso 25600.</p>
<p>LIVE (Lens Interchangeable, Viefinder Electronic) system allows for the body to be the size and weight of a 5d Mark 2.</p>
<p>Enhanced 73 point AF system allows for improved autofocus, with modes enabled in the movie mode to allow for better control of the autofocus.</p>
<p>Electronic IR filter allows you to take IR photographs at handheld speeds, but does not hamper visible light photography with the IR filter electronically activated.</p>
<p>The sole caveat? This camera costs $35000 a pop to make up for the R&amp;D costs.</p>
<p>Canon 2000D</p>
<p>9 spot AF.<br />
8 megapixels<br />
Modern high ISO reduction design allows for usable 6400 ISO.<br />
640&#215;480 movie mode at 30 FPS.</p>
<p>Sells for $500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pure</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-37254</link>
		<dc:creator>Pure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-37254</guid>
		<description>Well, the 1d mkIV goes against the grain of traditional Canon thought; instead of increasing the megapixels, they decreased it while increasing ISO and speed. 

So no, the 1d mkIV is a bit unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the 1d mkIV goes against the grain of traditional Canon thought; instead of increasing the megapixels, they decreased it while increasing ISO and speed. </p>
<p>So no, the 1d mkIV is a bit unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ossme</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-36022</link>
		<dc:creator>ossme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-36022</guid>
		<description>CR0 basically because it is technically wrong. the guy who wrote it didn&#039;t even calculate it proparlly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CR0 basically because it is technically wrong. the guy who wrote it didn&#8217;t even calculate it proparlly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35878</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35878</guid>
		<description>Canon made some technological breakthroughs in the new 7d sensor. Probably even better than backlight technology on larger sensors. I doubt they will reduce the mpx for 3d. I think Canon will release the 1ds4 with 32mpx in the beginning of the year, then pop that same sensor into the 3d later on. That makes more sense.

What&#039;s all this talk about Canon losing market share again? The latest BCN ranking for 2009 shows Canon with a whopping 10% lead over NIKON. Although that is mainly for the japo mkt, it is a good indication for the market on the whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon made some technological breakthroughs in the new 7d sensor. Probably even better than backlight technology on larger sensors. I doubt they will reduce the mpx for 3d. I think Canon will release the 1ds4 with 32mpx in the beginning of the year, then pop that same sensor into the 3d later on. That makes more sense.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s all this talk about Canon losing market share again? The latest BCN ranking for 2009 shows Canon with a whopping 10% lead over NIKON. Although that is mainly for the japo mkt, it is a good indication for the market on the whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5DIII wisher</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35867</link>
		<dc:creator>5DIII wisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35867</guid>
		<description>If so, could it be a backlit CMOS sensor??? 

But with a backlit CMOS even with the same sensor size, should has 2x better low light performance. So with new backlit CMOS + new 7D sensor designed (gapless microlenses + reduced distance between microlenses and photodiodes), the new sensor should be 25Mp with native ISO up to 51,200. =P

If not, think sensor too small for a new FF DSLR camera, then should be called 5D MkIIs, where &#039;s&#039; stands for small, but don&#039;t tell anyone so everybody think &#039;s&#039; stands for super. =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If so, could it be a backlit CMOS sensor??? </p>
<p>But with a backlit CMOS even with the same sensor size, should has 2x better low light performance. So with new backlit CMOS + new 7D sensor designed (gapless microlenses + reduced distance between microlenses and photodiodes), the new sensor should be 25Mp with native ISO up to 51,200. =P</p>
<p>If not, think sensor too small for a new FF DSLR camera, then should be called 5D MkIIs, where &#8216;s&#8217; stands for small, but don&#8217;t tell anyone so everybody think &#8216;s&#8217; stands for super. =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fireice</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35857</link>
		<dc:creator>Fireice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35857</guid>
		<description>They want a D800 or D4 coz they&#039;re stuck in 12mp land. There are people who need more than 12mp and currently the D3X is the only solution for Darksiders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want a D800 or D4 coz they&#8217;re stuck in 12mp land. There are people who need more than 12mp and currently the D3X is the only solution for Darksiders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fireice</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35856</link>
		<dc:creator>Fireice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35856</guid>
		<description>They are freaking expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are freaking expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35806</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35806</guid>
		<description>I also have bought a 5D2 and have had a 5D for over 3 years shooting Weddings &amp; Portraits, i have found that i get quite a few out of focus images at Weddings with the 5D2 , which is very frutrating. The autofocus on the original 5D seems more reliable even though they are supposed to be the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have bought a 5D2 and have had a 5D for over 3 years shooting Weddings &amp; Portraits, i have found that i get quite a few out of focus images at Weddings with the 5D2 , which is very frutrating. The autofocus on the original 5D seems more reliable even though they are supposed to be the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35799</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35799</guid>
		<description>I think this is wrong. These cameras may sabotage each other a bit (if they will ever exist together), but have very different strengths and would be totally different beasts. $3000 vs. $4000 is not the question. The audience is it. And as a wedding photographer, I&#039;d immediately go for the rumored 3D, if it only had a better AF than the 5D/5DII cameras.

Indeed, Nikon&#039;s D700 is what put&#039;s Nikon in a advantageous position right now. Not for Megapixel, not for a little noise advantage (or not) and not much for price. But for having a real pro-quality body and especially pro-AF in a compact and full-frame format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is wrong. These cameras may sabotage each other a bit (if they will ever exist together), but have very different strengths and would be totally different beasts. $3000 vs. $4000 is not the question. The audience is it. And as a wedding photographer, I&#8217;d immediately go for the rumored 3D, if it only had a better AF than the 5D/5DII cameras.</p>
<p>Indeed, Nikon&#8217;s D700 is what put&#8217;s Nikon in a advantageous position right now. Not for Megapixel, not for a little noise advantage (or not) and not much for price. But for having a real pro-quality body and especially pro-AF in a compact and full-frame format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abret</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35789</link>
		<dc:creator>abret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35789</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t read you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t read you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abret</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35788</link>
		<dc:creator>abret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35788</guid>
		<description>I wonder why the camera has to do noise reduction while bursting. Couldn&#039;t these tasks be done in background while idle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why the camera has to do noise reduction while bursting. Couldn&#8217;t these tasks be done in background while idle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abret</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/the-mythical-eos-3d-cr1/comment-page-2/#comment-35786</link>
		<dc:creator>abret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3245#comment-35786</guid>
		<description>huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.019 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 539/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 17:39:57 -->
