<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Announces A3000 &amp; A3100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/canon-announces-a3000-a3100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/canon-announces-a3000-a3100/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvesson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/canon-announces-a3000-a3100/comment-page-1/#comment-36722</link>
		<dc:creator>yvesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3291#comment-36722</guid>
		<description>Hej, it&#039;s hard to believe, but canon managed to do worse than A2000 and such. The way it goes, I won&#039;t buy a compact cam anymore, I&#039;m afraid. Why, oh why, canon ? Now I have to hope for panasonic revives its LZ serie, so canon copies them and revives the A serie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej, it&#8217;s hard to believe, but canon managed to do worse than A2000 and such. The way it goes, I won&#8217;t buy a compact cam anymore, I&#8217;m afraid. Why, oh why, canon ? Now I have to hope for panasonic revives its LZ serie, so canon copies them and revives the A serie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Daguerre</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/canon-announces-a3000-a3100/comment-page-1/#comment-36536</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Daguerre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3291#comment-36536</guid>
		<description>No fair! Why no SDXC for the EOS-1D Mark IV?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No fair! Why no SDXC for the EOS-1D Mark IV?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/canon-announces-a3000-a3100/comment-page-1/#comment-36525</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3291#comment-36525</guid>
		<description>Actually the A3000/A3100 have Li-ion battery packs now.
The new A490/A495 still have AA&#039;s, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the A3000/A3100 have Li-ion battery packs now.<br />
The new A490/A495 still have AA&#8217;s, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/canon-announces-a3000-a3100/comment-page-1/#comment-36486</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3291#comment-36486</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one that had the impression that the &quot;A&quot; in A-series meant AA batteries?

My mind has been blown. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that had the impression that the &#8220;A&#8221; in A-series meant AA batteries?</p>
<p>My mind has been blown. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/39 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 389/389 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 20:22:06 -->
