<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II Availability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ex-Canonuser</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-37487</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-Canonuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-37487</guid>
		<description>This is complete tripe. Everybody claims to have a friend that is a fairly knowledgeable Canon employee, yet they never seem to get the facts right. I wonder why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is complete tripe. Everybody claims to have a friend that is a fairly knowledgeable Canon employee, yet they never seem to get the facts right. I wonder why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-37058</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 05:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-37058</guid>
		<description>I think their decision to not announce the US price is all because of the current rebates going on right now for the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think their decision to not announce the US price is all because of the current rebates going on right now for the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garys</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-37047</link>
		<dc:creator>Garys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-37047</guid>
		<description>Canon&#039;s person at their CES booth said to expect US availability soon, March or April.  He also said he hasn&#039;t been told the price and doesn&#039;t think that Canon has finalized their US price point yet, but that he expects they will announce a price and date sometime in the next week or so.  Take that for what it is, a fairly knowledgeable canon employee making what seem like well educated guesses, but guesses nonetheless.  He also refused to even speculate on the price.

I had a chance to play with the lens a bit (well under 2 minutes max) and in that short time, my subjective stand-out difference compared to the mark 1 was faster focus.  It felt like the camera/lens combo was more sure of itself, it picked a spot and quickly focused it.  Of course, I don&#039;t have the opportunity to look at the photos on the pixel level, so who knows if it got the focus right, but it did pick it authoritatively and looked, through the viewfinder and on the camera display, pretty well focused.  The other thing was it seemed quieter.  Granted, CES was really really loud, so who knows if the absence of noise from the lens was real.  Can&#039;t wait to play with a copy of this lens in more evaluation-friendly environment.

The other (off topic) thing I found interesting was how much Canon was pushing the EOS line for video.  A few people on this site have commented that maybe a lot of lenses are going to be revamped to deliver better results for HD video, and based on the push they&#039;re making at CES, its certainly possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon&#8217;s person at their CES booth said to expect US availability soon, March or April.  He also said he hasn&#8217;t been told the price and doesn&#8217;t think that Canon has finalized their US price point yet, but that he expects they will announce a price and date sometime in the next week or so.  Take that for what it is, a fairly knowledgeable canon employee making what seem like well educated guesses, but guesses nonetheless.  He also refused to even speculate on the price.</p>
<p>I had a chance to play with the lens a bit (well under 2 minutes max) and in that short time, my subjective stand-out difference compared to the mark 1 was faster focus.  It felt like the camera/lens combo was more sure of itself, it picked a spot and quickly focused it.  Of course, I don&#8217;t have the opportunity to look at the photos on the pixel level, so who knows if it got the focus right, but it did pick it authoritatively and looked, through the viewfinder and on the camera display, pretty well focused.  The other thing was it seemed quieter.  Granted, CES was really really loud, so who knows if the absence of noise from the lens was real.  Can&#8217;t wait to play with a copy of this lens in more evaluation-friendly environment.</p>
<p>The other (off topic) thing I found interesting was how much Canon was pushing the EOS line for video.  A few people on this site have commented that maybe a lot of lenses are going to be revamped to deliver better results for HD video, and based on the push they&#8217;re making at CES, its certainly possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinseow</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36843</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinseow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36843</guid>
		<description>I strongly believe 70-200mm IS will be discountinued.
So it will only left 70-200mm IS II and the one without IS.
This is inline with the F4 version. Also the price is likely to be USD2199-2399.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly believe 70-200mm IS will be discountinued.<br />
So it will only left 70-200mm IS II and the one without IS.<br />
This is inline with the F4 version. Also the price is likely to be USD2199-2399.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36840</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36840</guid>
		<description>I have to agree.  The current 70-200 2.8 IS lens is flat out amazing.  I personally can&#039;t justify the higher price.  We&#039;re getting into the realm of lenses being so good, there really isn&#039;t any reason to get something &quot;nicer&quot;, because the lens won&#039;t make any difference for almost all photographers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree.  The current 70-200 2.8 IS lens is flat out amazing.  I personally can&#8217;t justify the higher price.  We&#8217;re getting into the realm of lenses being so good, there really isn&#8217;t any reason to get something &#8220;nicer&#8221;, because the lens won&#8217;t make any difference for almost all photographers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Vann</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36788</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Vann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36788</guid>
		<description>Yeah If that is going to be the price then Canon can keep it.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah If that is going to be the price then Canon can keep it&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36787</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36787</guid>
		<description>Hey Guys 

The canon 1D mk4 has been out in New Zealand before Christmas.The selling price is NZ$ 7775.00</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guys </p>
<p>The canon 1D mk4 has been out in New Zealand before Christmas.The selling price is NZ$ 7775.00</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hutjeflut</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36784</link>
		<dc:creator>hutjeflut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36784</guid>
		<description>seems awefully expencive to me the &#039;&#039;old&#039;&#039; is 920 euros cheaper you have a MP-E 65 for that money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems awefully expencive to me the &#8221;old&#8221; is 920 euros cheaper you have a MP-E 65 for that money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mageno</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36779</link>
		<dc:creator>mageno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36779</guid>
		<description>Price 2399 Euro
March 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price 2399 Euro<br />
March 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mageno</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36778</link>
		<dc:creator>mageno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36778</guid>
		<description>See the official link at Canon Germany:
http://www.canon.de/About_Us/Press_Centre/Press_Releases/Consumer_News/Cameras_Accessories/EF_70-200mm_f2.8L_IS_II_USM_Press_Release.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the official link at Canon Germany:<br />
<a href="http://www.canon.de/About_Us/Press_Centre/Press_Releases/Consumer_News/Cameras_Accessories/EF_70-200mm_f2.8L_IS_II_USM_Press_Release.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.canon.de/About_Us/Press_Centre/Press_Releases/Consumer_News/Cameras_Accessories/EF_70-200mm_f2.8L_IS_II_USM_Press_Release.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36768</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36768</guid>
		<description>Anyone knows the price history of the original 70-200mm lens.  Is it because Canon try to keep the price high until they get rid of all the old inventory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone knows the price history of the original 70-200mm lens.  Is it because Canon try to keep the price high until they get rid of all the old inventory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36739</link>
		<dc:creator>someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36739</guid>
		<description>how so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36735</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36735</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I believe that it is going to be better than the current version, so yes, it will be worth the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I believe that it is going to be better than the current version, so yes, it will be worth the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-usm-ii-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-36730</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3300#comment-36730</guid>
		<description>Canon US shows the lens as available February 2010 (http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=150&amp;modelid=19092) 
No info on possible price though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon US shows the lens as available February 2010 (<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&#038;fcategoryid=150&#038;modelid=19092" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&#038;fcategoryid=150&#038;modelid=19092</a>)<br />
No info on possible price though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 23:11:01 -->
