<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictions for 2010 Part 3 &#8211; PowerShot &amp; Accessories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincebcn</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-53689</link>
		<dc:creator>vincebcn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 11:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-53689</guid>
		<description>Hi,

There are more news of new powershot G12 or 13... a date? PLEASE !!!! I don&#039;t find nothing of news about that... :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>There are more news of new powershot G12 or 13&#8230; a date? PLEASE !!!! I don&#8217;t find nothing of news about that&#8230; :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john wewege</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-44492</link>
		<dc:creator>john wewege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-44492</guid>
		<description>Are you expecting an upgrade or replacement for the Canon Powershot SX1IS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you expecting an upgrade or replacement for the Canon Powershot SX1IS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.Y.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-37001</link>
		<dc:creator>D.Y.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-37001</guid>
		<description>+1 about DPP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 about DPP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Bronson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36562</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36562</guid>
		<description>Still puzzled as to why my girlfriend&#039;s SX20 IS doesn&#039;t have a rechargeable battery. Was Canon just being cheap? Because the cost of the camera wasn&#039;t too cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still puzzled as to why my girlfriend&#8217;s SX20 IS doesn&#8217;t have a rechargeable battery. Was Canon just being cheap? Because the cost of the camera wasn&#8217;t too cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36436</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36436</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind DPP&#039;s current interface, it&#039;s simple and easy to use.
I don&#039;t see what people complain about it for compared to using PS.  DPP is way easier to use and provides very good results that have that Canon-look.  PS has plenty more options, mostly not-needed ones when it comes to RAW conversion altho there&#039;s nothing like PS when you need to do some seriously heavy work on a file.

But gheez is DPP ever SLOW on an old PPC mac.  It also chokes to a near halt if there&#039;s more than 300 files in a folder.  I wish THAT part would be fixed. 3.7.2 has also been quite unstable, the older versions never crashed like this one.

Compacts - I was really excited when the A650is came along...  but then I saw the lack of dynamic range and decided not to buy one.  My old A610 still works beauty for what I need of it.

An A650is-alike, but with fewer MP for more DR and better S/N &amp; IQ, still running on 4x &quot;AA&quot; cells would be welcome, or give the G11 back the stopped-down preview function when pressing AE-lock.

Now, let&#039;s see about some new lenses..  The new 70-200 f/2.8 L IS&#039; MTF chart is showing some improvement in at the wide end, not so much at the long end.  We&#039;ll have to see some real-world tests.  I hope the contrast is improved over the original 2.8 IS version.  I like that lens but it&#039;s a little washed out for contrast right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind DPP&#8217;s current interface, it&#8217;s simple and easy to use.<br />
I don&#8217;t see what people complain about it for compared to using PS.  DPP is way easier to use and provides very good results that have that Canon-look.  PS has plenty more options, mostly not-needed ones when it comes to RAW conversion altho there&#8217;s nothing like PS when you need to do some seriously heavy work on a file.</p>
<p>But gheez is DPP ever SLOW on an old PPC mac.  It also chokes to a near halt if there&#8217;s more than 300 files in a folder.  I wish THAT part would be fixed. 3.7.2 has also been quite unstable, the older versions never crashed like this one.</p>
<p>Compacts &#8211; I was really excited when the A650is came along&#8230;  but then I saw the lack of dynamic range and decided not to buy one.  My old A610 still works beauty for what I need of it.</p>
<p>An A650is-alike, but with fewer MP for more DR and better S/N &amp; IQ, still running on 4x &#8220;AA&#8221; cells would be welcome, or give the G11 back the stopped-down preview function when pressing AE-lock.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s see about some new lenses..  The new 70-200 f/2.8 L IS&#8217; MTF chart is showing some improvement in at the wide end, not so much at the long end.  We&#8217;ll have to see some real-world tests.  I hope the contrast is improved over the original 2.8 IS version.  I like that lens but it&#8217;s a little washed out for contrast right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canonmonster</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36420</link>
		<dc:creator>Canonmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36420</guid>
		<description>All the lenses are back up with updated picture of the lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the lenses are back up with updated picture of the lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canonmonster</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36418</link>
		<dc:creator>Canonmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36418</guid>
		<description>I think there won&#039;t be tomuch at ces,
I&#039;ll just go to the Vivid convention nextdoor ( adult convention )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there won&#8217;t be tomuch at ces,<br />
I&#8217;ll just go to the Vivid convention nextdoor ( adult convention )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caps18</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36416</link>
		<dc:creator>caps18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36416</guid>
		<description>I want a GPS add-on as well.  There is the PhotoTrackr that probably would work for me, but I do need this ability in order to organize photos easily in iPhoto.

Then again, unless the feature is built into new cameras, the competition from 3rd parties may be too great now for Canon to even want to get into the GPS game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a GPS add-on as well.  There is the PhotoTrackr that probably would work for me, but I do need this ability in order to organize photos easily in iPhoto.</p>
<p>Then again, unless the feature is built into new cameras, the competition from 3rd parties may be too great now for Canon to even want to get into the GPS game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvesson</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36413</link>
		<dc:creator>yvesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36413</guid>
		<description>Hej, this is like a nightmare : even flatter than A2000 Is and others, no more AA, no more x6 zoom. Call A3100 IS an IXUS, it&#039;s nothing else than one more IXUS.
I feel so bad, I hate canon for doing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej, this is like a nightmare : even flatter than A2000 Is and others, no more AA, no more x6 zoom. Call A3100 IS an IXUS, it&#8217;s nothing else than one more IXUS.<br />
I feel so bad, I hate canon for doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36411</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36411</guid>
		<description>70-200 IS II is announced</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>70-200 IS II is announced</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36406</link>
		<dc:creator>AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36406</guid>
		<description>With 2 A49x (A490/A495),the E1 will disasppear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 2 A49x (A490/A495),the E1 will disasppear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardR</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36405</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36405</guid>
		<description>I Would love to replace my old P&amp;S with a PowerShot A3000 IS..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Would love to replace my old P&amp;S with a PowerShot A3000 IS..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36404</link>
		<dc:creator>AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36404</guid>
		<description>A3000/A3100 have li=on bstteries in place of AA plus some new shooting modes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A3000/A3100 have li=on bstteries in place of AA plus some new shooting modes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVID PR</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/predictions-for-2010-part-3-powershot-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-36403</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVID PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3284#comment-36403</guid>
		<description>The lenses are back 
     EF
70-200mm
f/2.8L IS II   
 this is the link
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&amp;fcategoryid=150</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lenses are back<br />
     EF<br />
70-200mm<br />
f/2.8L IS II<br />
 this is the link<br />
<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&#038;fcategoryid=150" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&#038;fcategoryid=150</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 23:50:12 -->
