Comments on: *UPDATE* Where Have They Gone? http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/ You gotta know Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Eric http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36448 Eric Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:26:39 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36448 ....sure, within an hour they are back... Though there was obviously an update included, it wasnt as big as I had hoped. ….sure, within an hour they are back…

Though there was obviously an update included, it wasnt as big as I had hoped.

]]> By: Philm http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36417 Philm Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:14:45 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36417 The Lenses are back! There are a few new non-L models and a 70-200 f2.8 IS II. http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=150 The Lenses are back! There are a few new non-L models and a 70-200 f2.8 IS II.
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=150

]]> By: Eric http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36415 Eric Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:38:26 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36415 This is a logical and well written response but I am still not 100% convinced. My reasoning is: - It posted in a forum not on an official Canon Web Page - This should be a VERY easy to fix but has existed for several days - The web pages where not deleted but where moved into the archive area This is a logical and well written response but I am still not 100% convinced.

My reasoning is:

– It posted in a forum not on an official Canon Web Page

– This should be a VERY easy to fix but has existed for several days

– The web pages where not deleted but where moved into the archive area

]]> By: Philm http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36317 Philm Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:03:04 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36317 Canon's email reply to my inquiry about the missing lenses: We are sorry to hear that you have noticed lenses missing from the Canon EF lenses support site. At this moment there is no information available regarding new product changes in the lens category. Please keep in mind, however, that Canon continuously reviews its product lineup, and as new products are introduced, existing models are often taken out of production. We recommend you check our website (www.canoneos.com) from time to time to learn of new product announcements in the U.S. market. Our EOS cameras use EF series lenses. To view our current lens lineup, please visit the following Web site: http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses We hope this information is helpful to you. Please let us know if we can be of any further assistance with Canon EF Lenses. Thank you for choosing Canon. Canon’s email reply to my inquiry about the missing lenses:

We are sorry to hear that you
have noticed lenses missing from the Canon EF lenses support site.
At this moment there is no information available regarding new product
changes in the lens category. Please keep in mind, however, that Canon
continuously reviews its product lineup, and as new products are
introduced, existing models are often taken out of production. We
recommend you check our website (www.canoneos.com) from time to time to
learn of new product announcements in the U.S. market.

Our EOS cameras use EF series lenses. To view our current lens lineup,
please visit the following Web site:

http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses

We hope this information is helpful to you. Please let us know if we
can be of any further assistance with Canon EF Lenses.

Thank you for choosing Canon.

]]> By: Deeyas http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36228 Deeyas Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:19:35 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36228 Chiming in with Nate's post .... Canon is updating the eos website. You should be able to reach the "missing" lenses via http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=SupportIndexAct Chiming in with Nate’s post …. Canon is updating the eos website. You should be able to reach the “missing” lenses via http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=SupportIndexAct

]]> By: Nate http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36181 Nate Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:29:08 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36181 Some of you have noticed that a significant number of lenses are missing from the Canon USA website at this moment. You can rest assured that your favorite lens has not been discontinued - Canon USA has "... identified the issue and will have it fixed as soon as possible". Posted Jan 04 2010, 11:42 AM by Bryan Carnathan Filed under: Canon USA http://community.the-digital-picture.com/blogs/news/archive/2010/01/04/lenses-missing-from-the-canon-usa-website.aspx Some of you have noticed that a significant number of lenses are missing from the Canon USA website at this moment.

You can rest assured that your favorite lens has not been discontinued – Canon USA has “… identified the issue and will have it fixed as soon as possible”.
Posted Jan 04 2010, 11:42 AM by Bryan Carnathan
Filed under: Canon USA

http://community.the-digital-picture.com/blogs/news/archive/2010/01/04/lenses-missing-from-the-canon-usa-website.aspx

]]> By: NC http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36173 NC Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:26:32 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36173 Weren't Wolf connected to Ritz? Ritz no longer carries Canon, but I believe that's because of the bankruptcy proceedings not because of anything to do with Canon's products or concerns about Canon. Weren’t Wolf connected to Ritz? Ritz no longer carries Canon, but I believe that’s because of the bankruptcy proceedings not because of anything to do with Canon’s products or concerns about Canon.

]]> By: Runz http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36127 Runz Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:20:57 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36127 Hm, the 3 70-200 have all NO, or OUTDATES IS's. The Only only one with a more or less up2date IS is the 70-200f/4IS. Maybe they spend a big (innovative) "IS" Update to most of the lenses. Hm, the 3 70-200 have all NO, or OUTDATES IS’s. The Only only one with a more or less up2date IS is the 70-200f/4IS.

Maybe they spend a big (innovative) “IS” Update to most of the lenses.

]]> By: fotograf profesionist nunta Iasi http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36118 fotograf profesionist nunta Iasi Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:31:34 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36118 Maybe is just a webmaster mistake. I don't think the all 70-200 will be discontinued in the same time. Maybe is just a webmaster mistake. I don’t think the all 70-200 will be discontinued in the same time.

]]> By: J-Man http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36104 J-Man Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:27:32 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36104 The canadian page doesn't even show the tse17 and it's been out a while now. The canadian page doesn’t even show the tse17 and it’s been out a while now.

]]> By: 50/50 http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36099 50/50 Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:48:08 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36099 I don't know why everyone goes on about wanting IS, it's good on the side of hand holding at slower shutter speeds, but it also means more glass... heavier and sometimes even a softer lens. I could be wrong about this but wasn't the 70-200 f/2.8l Sharper then the IS version? (ignoring that the f/4 was arguably sharper then the 2.8l is) I don’t know why everyone goes on about wanting IS, it’s good on the side of hand holding at slower shutter speeds, but it also means more glass… heavier and sometimes even a softer lens.

I could be wrong about this but wasn’t the 70-200 f/2.8l Sharper then the IS version? (ignoring that the f/4 was arguably sharper then the 2.8l is)

]]> By: Carey Photography http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36098 Carey Photography Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:43:56 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36098 There getting a new hybrid IS update, or being completely updated to IS, with the new hybrid system. What do ya think? Wishful thinking? There getting a new hybrid IS update, or being completely updated to IS, with the new hybrid system. What do ya think? Wishful thinking?

]]> By: The_D http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36095 The_D Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:18:03 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36095 looks like they paid up on their bill. looks like they paid up on their bill.

]]> By: The_D http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/where-have-they-gone/comment-page-2/#comment-36094 The_D Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:10:55 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3259#comment-36094 If I recall, Canon dropped Wolf Camera, not the other way around. I believe that Wolf was on serious credit hold. If I recall, Canon dropped Wolf Camera, not the other way around. I believe that Wolf was on serious credit hold.

]]>