<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1D Mark IV Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-44805</link>
		<dc:creator>Speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-44805</guid>
		<description>In the update to this article near the bottom in pros and cons
and under the cons it says &quot;Spot-AF and Spot AF can only be activated on the select 7 lenses that have an AF-OFF button&quot;
Anyone know which 7 Lenses he speaks of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the update to this article near the bottom in pros and cons<br />
and under the cons it says &#8220;Spot-AF and Spot AF can only be activated on the select 7 lenses that have an AF-OFF button&#8221;<br />
Anyone know which 7 Lenses he speaks of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40567</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40567</guid>
		<description>From a new review by Michael Willems:

In general, even an amateur-level Nikon camera offers more customizing settings than a 1-level Canon body, and alas, that has not changed. It seems to me that Canon controls their market by leaving functions out; Nikon expands its market by including extra functions.

This seems to be exactly what this reviewer has found but not outright said.  Leaving out features like spot af, and many other updates from the 7D, and much customization in general in their lineups (auto iso still comes to mind)

Planning to switch to the dark side</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a new review by Michael Willems:</p>
<p>In general, even an amateur-level Nikon camera offers more customizing settings than a 1-level Canon body, and alas, that has not changed. It seems to me that Canon controls their market by leaving functions out; Nikon expands its market by including extra functions.</p>
<p>This seems to be exactly what this reviewer has found but not outright said.  Leaving out features like spot af, and many other updates from the 7D, and much customization in general in their lineups (auto iso still comes to mind)</p>
<p>Planning to switch to the dark side</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40506</link>
		<dc:creator>Speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40506</guid>
		<description>Get it right

    * Name CR Guy
    * Location Canada
    * Web http://www.canonrumors.com/
    * Bio You Gotta Know

It&#039;s Canadian, don&#039;t like it? don&#039;t believe it?
go to top of the page and click twitter look to the right, above all the pics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get it right</p>
<p>    * Name CR Guy<br />
    * Location Canada<br />
    * Web <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.canonrumors.com/</a><br />
    * Bio You Gotta Know</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Canadian, don&#8217;t like it? don&#8217;t believe it?<br />
go to top of the page and click twitter look to the right, above all the pics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Daguerre</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40448</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Daguerre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40448</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s American - they spell it &quot;rumors&quot;, not &quot;rumours&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s American &#8211; they spell it &#8220;rumors&#8221;, not &#8220;rumours&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blargh x2</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40437</link>
		<dc:creator>blargh x2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40437</guid>
		<description>dear wucky,

nobody stated anywhere that we base our opinions on one review, thats you assumption
 please stop embarrassing yourself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear wucky,</p>
<p>nobody stated anywhere that we base our opinions on one review, thats you assumption<br />
 please stop embarrassing yourself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40159</guid>
		<description>DISAPPOINTING!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DISAPPOINTING!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVID PR</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40158</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVID PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40158</guid>
		<description>NEW T2i
No Eos 60D
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10020806canoneos550d.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW T2i<br />
No Eos 60D<br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10020806canoneos550d.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10020806canoneos550d.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40150</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40150</guid>
		<description>No it&#039;s not just you. I think that&#039;s what the 5D3 rumor is trying to suggests is going to change in a year&#039;s time. We&#039;ll get the full frame performance paired with a pro, or at least (more) pro autofocus system. The 1Ds4 is going to be a beast of a camera, but it comes with a beast of a price. The current 1Ds model is getting long in the tooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it&#8217;s not just you. I think that&#8217;s what the 5D3 rumor is trying to suggests is going to change in a year&#8217;s time. We&#8217;ll get the full frame performance paired with a pro, or at least (more) pro autofocus system. The 1Ds4 is going to be a beast of a camera, but it comes with a beast of a price. The current 1Ds model is getting long in the tooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PavelR</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40130</link>
		<dc:creator>PavelR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40130</guid>
		<description>I do not want in camera cropping nor to mount EF-S lenses on 1.3x camera, but there are several advantages (maybe useful to somebody else):
* faster in camera processing of an image
* faster saving an image to memory card
* later image sequence buffer fill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not want in camera cropping nor to mount EF-S lenses on 1.3x camera, but there are several advantages (maybe useful to somebody else):<br />
* faster in camera processing of an image<br />
* faster saving an image to memory card<br />
* later image sequence buffer fill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40126</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40126</guid>
		<description>It seems the high priced 1Ds will be a Canon shooters only option if they want a Full Frame Pro body. I myself think its a F__King disgrace and a ripoff. I have a 5D 1&amp;2 which i use to shoot weddings &amp; Portraits etc and would love a FF probody with Pro autofocus. Is it just me that thinks charging 4 or 5 times the amount of a 5D2 for this extra privilage is justified?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the high priced 1Ds will be a Canon shooters only option if they want a Full Frame Pro body. I myself think its a F__King disgrace and a ripoff. I have a 5D 1&amp;2 which i use to shoot weddings &amp; Portraits etc and would love a FF probody with Pro autofocus. Is it just me that thinks charging 4 or 5 times the amount of a 5D2 for this extra privilage is justified?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40116</guid>
		<description>Why 2 1D Mark III&#039;s ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why 2 1D Mark III&#8217;s ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seb</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40115</link>
		<dc:creator>seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40115</guid>
		<description>Yep nice review and slr. To sum it up, pretty much confirms what we all already know which is that this camera was designed specifically for shooting sports. Most likely better performance could be had from nikons range of slr for shooting weddings and events etc due to full frame, that is until the 1Ds IV becomes available. Nothing to get excited about here, will wait for the next 1Ds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep nice review and slr. To sum it up, pretty much confirms what we all already know which is that this camera was designed specifically for shooting sports. Most likely better performance could be had from nikons range of slr for shooting weddings and events etc due to full frame, that is until the 1Ds IV becomes available. Nothing to get excited about here, will wait for the next 1Ds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: traveller</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40108</link>
		<dc:creator>traveller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40108</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, the lightrules conversion was meant for the 10D as well -should have looked a little harder.  It does raise the question of the mirror size on 1.3x crop bodies and whether it would collide with EFS-EF converted lenses (probably would).  All a little bit moot anyway as it would be pretty pointless, I have never heard of anyone regularly using third-party crop frame lenses on their 1.3x or FF bodies.  Doubtless this last comment will drag someone out of the woodwork who does!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, the lightrules conversion was meant for the 10D as well -should have looked a little harder.  It does raise the question of the mirror size on 1.3x crop bodies and whether it would collide with EFS-EF converted lenses (probably would).  All a little bit moot anyway as it would be pretty pointless, I have never heard of anyone regularly using third-party crop frame lenses on their 1.3x or FF bodies.  Doubtless this last comment will drag someone out of the woodwork who does!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justingryba</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40105</link>
		<dc:creator>justingryba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3528#comment-40105</guid>
		<description>updated ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>updated &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.033 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 16:07:13 -->
