<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1D Mark IV Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron Fizzy</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39927</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron Fizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39927</guid>
		<description>The same thing is happening in New Zealand, with Canon not wanting to supply stock that they already have until the firmware has been upgraded (which was last week), so that makes complete sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same thing is happening in New Zealand, with Canon not wanting to supply stock that they already have until the firmware has been upgraded (which was last week), so that makes complete sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EF mount</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39872</link>
		<dc:creator>EF mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39872</guid>
		<description>I think they explained it quite well in the review. What really make you think about is what would have Canon achieved with lesser pixel density, if this is what they have done now. Now don&#039;t get me wrong, I am not complaining on 7D IQ as I do not have one nor tried one. But I&#039;m still thinking about, what would it be if it was 12MPix (as in direct comparision with D300s) used by current technology, which can pull out very impressive result considering pixel density on 7D&#039;s sensor. I mean look at 7D vs D300s lab results. It&#039;s basically very similar to each other, yet 7D has denser sensor with more resolution. If 7D was &quot;only&quot; as 12Mpix as is D300s, then I believe that Canon could pull out a D300s killer with its technology :)

Well, just an opinion of &quot;what could have been...&quot;, don&#039;t get too carried away, guys :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they explained it quite well in the review. What really make you think about is what would have Canon achieved with lesser pixel density, if this is what they have done now. Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am not complaining on 7D IQ as I do not have one nor tried one. But I&#8217;m still thinking about, what would it be if it was 12MPix (as in direct comparision with D300s) used by current technology, which can pull out very impressive result considering pixel density on 7D&#8217;s sensor. I mean look at 7D vs D300s lab results. It&#8217;s basically very similar to each other, yet 7D has denser sensor with more resolution. If 7D was &#8220;only&#8221; as 12Mpix as is D300s, then I believe that Canon could pull out a D300s killer with its technology :)</p>
<p>Well, just an opinion of &#8220;what could have been&#8230;&#8221;, don&#8217;t get too carried away, guys :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Prime</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39867</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Prime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39867</guid>
		<description>They gave it 4 starts? That was overly generous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They gave it 4 starts? That was overly generous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homerfreak</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39862</link>
		<dc:creator>homerfreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39862</guid>
		<description>:D :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:D :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scalesusa</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39861</link>
		<dc:creator>Scalesusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39861</guid>
		<description>I can almost hit their (Onecall) warehouse with a rock from where I live.  They are pretty honest, at least as camera sellers go.  Unfortunately, they have backed off from competiting with adorama and B&amp;H on prices, so when I buy from them, I have to pay a little more plus 9% sales tax.

They also no longer carry the pro models in their retail store, so a local buyer cannot pick one up and try it before buying it.  They can be picked up at the warehouse, and I&#039;ve done that several times, but for extra $$ on a big ticket item, I&#039;d like to see it first.

Still, they are local, and I can return a  defective item to their retail store and get a replacement immediately, so it is often worth more to me when I buy a lens that has a less than perfect record for variation in sharpness or AF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can almost hit their (Onecall) warehouse with a rock from where I live.  They are pretty honest, at least as camera sellers go.  Unfortunately, they have backed off from competiting with adorama and B&amp;H on prices, so when I buy from them, I have to pay a little more plus 9% sales tax.</p>
<p>They also no longer carry the pro models in their retail store, so a local buyer cannot pick one up and try it before buying it.  They can be picked up at the warehouse, and I&#8217;ve done that several times, but for extra $$ on a big ticket item, I&#8217;d like to see it first.</p>
<p>Still, they are local, and I can return a  defective item to their retail store and get a replacement immediately, so it is often worth more to me when I buy a lens that has a less than perfect record for variation in sharpness or AF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scalesusa</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39860</link>
		<dc:creator>Scalesusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39860</guid>
		<description>On the 1 D MKIV, spot AF cannot be assigned to any camera buttons.  It can only be assigned to the buttons on the big White Lenses.  There are a lot of users wondering why it can&#039;t be set in the body to work for any lens.

It might be a technical reason, but no one knows.

So those claiming to use spot AF without those big whites, please lets know how you set it.  There is nothing in the manual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the 1 D MKIV, spot AF cannot be assigned to any camera buttons.  It can only be assigned to the buttons on the big White Lenses.  There are a lot of users wondering why it can&#8217;t be set in the body to work for any lens.</p>
<p>It might be a technical reason, but no one knows.</p>
<p>So those claiming to use spot AF without those big whites, please lets know how you set it.  There is nothing in the manual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39859</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39859</guid>
		<description>If the price dropped a couple thousand pounds I would... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the price dropped a couple thousand pounds I would&#8230; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39855</link>
		<dc:creator>W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39855</guid>
		<description>Hey SJ, my spot focus has been spot on and performs better than my 1d3 (which was actually a good copy) ever did. If you are thinking about upgrading to the 1d IV that is one thing you don&#039;t have to worry about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey SJ, my spot focus has been spot on and performs better than my 1d3 (which was actually a good copy) ever did. If you are thinking about upgrading to the 1d IV that is one thing you don&#8217;t have to worry about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve T.</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39854</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39854</guid>
		<description>I have had one (1D Mk IV) on order through “Onecall” since the middle of Nov. I’m told I am near the top of their waiting list? I’ve done ten&#039;s of thousands of Dollars in business with them over the past five years and have always received great service from them, so I believe them when they tell me they don’t know when my order will be filled. As already discussed on this site, I believe the delay in restocking is probably due to Canon ensuring the latest firmware version is installed before shipping more 1D4s. Anyone else received their 1D4 from Onecall? If so, when did you pre-order?  BTW, the Rode N3594 works great on my 5D2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had one (1D Mk IV) on order through “Onecall” since the middle of Nov. I’m told I am near the top of their waiting list? I’ve done ten&#8217;s of thousands of Dollars in business with them over the past five years and have always received great service from them, so I believe them when they tell me they don’t know when my order will be filled. As already discussed on this site, I believe the delay in restocking is probably due to Canon ensuring the latest firmware version is installed before shipping more 1D4s. Anyone else received their 1D4 from Onecall? If so, when did you pre-order?  BTW, the Rode N3594 works great on my 5D2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39853</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39853</guid>
		<description>I wont be buying a 1D4, not that Canon obviously cares. I am a Wedding &amp; Portrait Photographer and use a 5D2 &amp; 5D1 and shoot approx 45 weddings per year. Im constantly pissed off with the autofocus on the 5D2 but need the full frame,if the 1D4 was FF i would have had my oder in from day 1. Obviouslly there is the option of buying the 1Ds but i dont feel i should have to fork out 3 times the price of a 5D2 to get a pro body with a decent auto focus. When the 1Ds4 is released it will probably be 5 times the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wont be buying a 1D4, not that Canon obviously cares. I am a Wedding &amp; Portrait Photographer and use a 5D2 &amp; 5D1 and shoot approx 45 weddings per year. Im constantly pissed off with the autofocus on the 5D2 but need the full frame,if the 1D4 was FF i would have had my oder in from day 1. Obviouslly there is the option of buying the 1Ds but i dont feel i should have to fork out 3 times the price of a 5D2 to get a pro body with a decent auto focus. When the 1Ds4 is released it will probably be 5 times the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39848</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39848</guid>
		<description>Have you all noticed, that Amazon removed the 1D IV from their homepage?? I cant find it there anymore !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you all noticed, that Amazon removed the 1D IV from their homepage?? I cant find it there anymore !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s'ok</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39847</link>
		<dc:creator>s'ok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39847</guid>
		<description>Yeah, real shocker there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, real shocker there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39844</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39844</guid>
		<description>the digital picture already posted a review

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-Mark-IV-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx

and there is an interesting shootout with the d3s here

http://uniquephoto.blogspot.com/2010/01/unique-photo-shootout-featuring-david.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the digital picture already posted a review</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-Mark-IV-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-Mark-IV-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx</a></p>
<p>and there is an interesting shootout with the d3s here</p>
<p><a href="http://uniquephoto.blogspot.com/2010/01/unique-photo-shootout-featuring-david.html" rel="nofollow">http://uniquephoto.blogspot.com/2010/01/unique-photo-shootout-featuring-david.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/1d-mark-iv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39843</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3438#comment-39843</guid>
		<description>I found the spot focus didn&#039;t work as good on my 1d3 after it was put through the last big overhaul of updates.

Maybe they are concentrating more on continuous AF for &#039;sports&#039; cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the spot focus didn&#8217;t work as good on my 1d3 after it was put through the last big overhaul of updates.</p>
<p>Maybe they are concentrating more on continuous AF for &#8216;sports&#8217; cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 16:02:16 -->
