<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II in Stock @ B&amp;H &amp; Adorama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoneking</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-47050</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoneking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-47050</guid>
		<description>the pictures of the white statue? or the house with the clay tiles? or are you talking about something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the pictures of the white statue? or the house with the clay tiles? or are you talking about something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoneking</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-47048</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoneking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-47048</guid>
		<description>thanks stoneking impersonator. I feel so good inside now that Norman likes me. If you can get Justin to like me too my world will be complete. 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamesstoneking/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks stoneking impersonator. I feel so good inside now that Norman likes me. If you can get Justin to like me too my world will be complete. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamesstoneking/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamesstoneking/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46993</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46993</guid>
		<description>Stoneking,atlast a sane message from you.your apology is accepted,dont wory ,no hardfeelings mate :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stoneking,atlast a sane message from you.your apology is accepted,dont wory ,no hardfeelings mate :-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoneking</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46966</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoneking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46966</guid>
		<description>Dear Justin and dear Norman,

i apologize to you both for being rude,maybe it´s just my nature,maybe it´s fanboyism but you are right whatever it is,i should be civil to people. i´ll try my best.
 sorry again for the troubles.please accept my apologies.

kind regards, 
Stoneking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Justin and dear Norman,</p>
<p>i apologize to you both for being rude,maybe it´s just my nature,maybe it´s fanboyism but you are right whatever it is,i should be civil to people. i´ll try my best.<br />
 sorry again for the troubles.please accept my apologies.</p>
<p>kind regards,<br />
Stoneking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46892</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46892</guid>
		<description>Norman,please dont make this a non camera discussion.i have seen that link and the pics, they really looked like it was taken with a kit lens,but it might have been a faulty lens.
Stone king you havent seen those pics so please stop being rude with your answers.

or shall i say Stone king is a typical fanboy, who i cant write anything civil nor take criticism about his brand eventhough he might be using only the XTi with a kit lens.

so norman ,please ignore him, it´s not worth it.uncivilized creatures are all over the place specially under the stones, they wont come out into the light and engage in a logical discussion.
peace to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norman,please dont make this a non camera discussion.i have seen that link and the pics, they really looked like it was taken with a kit lens,but it might have been a faulty lens.<br />
Stone king you havent seen those pics so please stop being rude with your answers.</p>
<p>or shall i say Stone king is a typical fanboy, who i cant write anything civil nor take criticism about his brand eventhough he might be using only the XTi with a kit lens.</p>
<p>so norman ,please ignore him, it´s not worth it.uncivilized creatures are all over the place specially under the stones, they wont come out into the light and engage in a logical discussion.<br />
peace to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46887</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46887</guid>
		<description>Stoneking, 

first of all i apologize to you for waking you up from your sleep in your own Ass.i thought you sleep under a STONE ,i really  didnt know you put your brainless head in your stinky big ass before sleeping.Ha ha ha.

well,you think that´s the only reason why 200 mm is costly ? ha ha ha. then you dont know much about the reason why it´s even built.go drink your milk and put back you head in your own ass and sleep.good dreams KID</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stoneking, </p>
<p>first of all i apologize to you for waking you up from your sleep in your own Ass.i thought you sleep under a STONE ,i really  didnt know you put your brainless head in your stinky big ass before sleeping.Ha ha ha.</p>
<p>well,you think that´s the only reason why 200 mm is costly ? ha ha ha. then you dont know much about the reason why it´s even built.go drink your milk and put back you head in your own ass and sleep.good dreams KID</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Daguerre</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46830</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Daguerre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46830</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also in stock by J&amp;R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also in stock by J&amp;R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetoolman</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46603</link>
		<dc:creator>thetoolman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46603</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  I expected to see improvement over the MKI which is an excellent lens too.  That Digital Image site is really neat.  I am still interested, however, in reading lab reviews -- especially the one from dpreview.com.  Too bad Canon got real greedy and priced the new model ridiculously higher than the old model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  I expected to see improvement over the MKI which is an excellent lens too.  That Digital Image site is really neat.  I am still interested, however, in reading lab reviews &#8212; especially the one from dpreview.com.  Too bad Canon got real greedy and priced the new model ridiculously higher than the old model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46414</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46414</guid>
		<description>http://bit.ly/cKHPNl (The Digital Image). The best lab tests as far as sharpness and CA goes that you&#039;ll get.

If you notice the difference between prime and zoom quality, you will notice this difference as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bit.ly/cKHPNl" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cKHPNl</a> (The Digital Image). The best lab tests as far as sharpness and CA goes that you&#8217;ll get.</p>
<p>If you notice the difference between prime and zoom quality, you will notice this difference as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoneking</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46402</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoneking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46402</guid>
		<description>im not saying the 70-200 is better than the 200 f2, but i am saying that there isnt much room between them. the 200 is twice as much money so it better be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im not saying the 70-200 is better than the 200 f2, but i am saying that there isnt much room between them. the 200 is twice as much money so it better be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoneking</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46401</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoneking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46401</guid>
		<description>next time remove your head from your ass before you look at the pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>next time remove your head from your ass before you look at the pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetoolman</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46362</link>
		<dc:creator>thetoolman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46362</guid>
		<description>What tests? I don&#039;t think anyone has formally tested it yet.  No matter, I am quite confident that it will be a terrific performer in any test -- it better for $2500.  I doubt it&#039;s performance improvements over the MK1 will be all that noticeable to most photographers anyway unless they really blow up their photos.  Most don&#039;t.  The MK1 is an excellent lens and it&#039;s replacement is not worth $800 unless it can wash my dishes and clean my house in addition to taking super sharp photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What tests? I don&#8217;t think anyone has formally tested it yet.  No matter, I am quite confident that it will be a terrific performer in any test &#8212; it better for $2500.  I doubt it&#8217;s performance improvements over the MK1 will be all that noticeable to most photographers anyway unless they really blow up their photos.  Most don&#8217;t.  The MK1 is an excellent lens and it&#8217;s replacement is not worth $800 unless it can wash my dishes and clean my house in addition to taking super sharp photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazybull</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46221</link>
		<dc:creator>crazybull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46221</guid>
		<description>Do you have a link to the tests?  I can&#039;t find any and I would love to read them.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a link to the tests?  I can&#8217;t find any and I would love to read them.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/03/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-in-stock-bh/comment-page-1/#comment-46191</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3868#comment-46191</guid>
		<description>Minimal? Have you seen the tests? I&#039;m selling my Mk1 and 100L (never use the macro anyway) to buy one. The Mk2 with a 1.4x teleconverter is still significantly sharper than the Mk1 at all focal lengths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minimal? Have you seen the tests? I&#8217;m selling my Mk1 and 100L (never use the macro anyway) to buy one. The Mk2 with a 1.4x teleconverter is still significantly sharper than the Mk1 at all focal lengths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 538/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 22:25:59 -->
