Comments on: EF Mount Pro Camcorder? [CR1]

By: PanozJim

PanozJim — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:35:35 +0000

Hows ’bout these……….

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/876557/1

By: Don

Don — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:30:09 +0000

Ron you bastard dont call others names you bastard

By: Miles

Miles — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:15:05 +0000

so you too are his father? then plz tell your son Ronniebastard that he should not go around calling others `bastard´simply coz he himself dosent know how many fathers he has.
this is a photography gear site,when someone acts like a fanboy people might say it but then dont start calling them back something rude cos someone tells the truth.
the saying goes “If it´s dumb like a Fanboy, writes like a fanboy, sounds like a fanboy then it´s a fanboy”
accept it

by the way i am atleast writing under the same name unlike you who dosent have a real surname;-))

By: Miles

Miles — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:08:59 +0000

Hi Fabio the great pig!
your son Ronniebastard.jr dosent know that you too are one of his father.
please enlighten him with your piggie brain you Great fat Pig.Dong dong dong dong.:-)))))))

By: JamesB

JamesB — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:57:03 +0000

Sorry Miles but you are acting more childish than Ron now…

By: Mike V

Mike V — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:21:24 +0000

Sony F35 and Panavision Genesis (high end single sensor HD video cameras) that record 4:4:4 or 4:2:2 (selectable) are both RGB stripe CCD sensors, not Bayer pattern.

RGB stripe is better for post production and effects work because with Bayer pattern, the colour channels have radically different MTF from each other.

By: Fabio

Fabio — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:32:48 +0000

Lol Miles!! You sound like a pig!! oinc oinc oinc!!

By: steve

steve — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:31:15 +0000

Every other part of my post was correct “by conventional benchmarks” – I used this wording for a good reason.
I would be very happy if this alleged camcorder used three imagers (or a special colour microfilter to split the RGB to each photodiode), but I sincerely doubt it (partly for the reasons you gave). This is why I thought it sensible to use a conventional single imager as the benchmark reference.

A CONVENTIONAL imager cannot record true 1080P RGB per pixel with a resolution of less than 9-10MP – by conventional benchmarks (RGBG over 4 pixels, 3/2 aspect); the detail will just alias out (even with the best demosaic filter applied).

I specifically bought my 1000D to produce near-true (ignoring the pixel offset) 1936*1288 (2.5MP) images (for 1080P stop motion). That IQ beats the crap out the HD video function of my 5D2, even with much less bandwidth applied (yes I know about the pixel binning and the limited data rate from that imager). A non-rolling shuttered version of that (10MP) on a camcorder, using an FF imager (and EF L lenses), with all the pixels clocked off of course, would be just the ticket. 10MP please!

By: Lucas

Lucas — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:02:48 +0000

They have updated the notification once again:
“We apologize for removing the gallery with sample images from Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens. The lens was the pre-production sample and did not have final quality. We promise to do a new test with final lens sample as soon as possible.”

By: Roland

Roland — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:31:30 +0000

Lenstip must be joking. With or without sharpening: the sample pics ARE poor. Even my “coke-bottle” 28-135mm IS is much sharper unsharpened.

By: Miles

Miles — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:32:19 +0000

Oh poor Ron grew up hearing that name all day long.everyone calls him by that name so he think it´s a good name to call strangers too :-)))))))
poor ronnieboy ,oye oye oye oye

By: Norman

Norman — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:30:11 +0000

at 2000$ + that lemon should´nt leave the factory, somuch for the QC eh?

By: Norman

Norman — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:26:05 +0000

Yeah significant updates like these?,

Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR2 – SHORTYYY :-)
Canon 70-200 2.8 IS2 – SOFTYYYY ;-)

By: JJon

JJon — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:23:35 +0000

Koogle needs this new 70 200 up his A**** :-)