<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Canon Speedlite [CR1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:35:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-54161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-54161</guid>
		<description>They are keeping their horrible IR system for remote firing? I love my camera but their remote system is next to useless when we use them for weddings.

What are they thinking keeping such limited tech in their new flash? Guess I&#039;ll be waiting to upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are keeping their horrible IR system for remote firing? I love my camera but their remote system is next to useless when we use them for weddings.</p>
<p>What are they thinking keeping such limited tech in their new flash? Guess I&#8217;ll be waiting to upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gelfert</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-54158</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gelfert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-54158</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t there when I wrote the question - was edited as I submitted it.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there when I wrote the question &#8211; was edited as I submitted it.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53838</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53838</guid>
		<description>Really, no sarcasm, I am so f&#039;ing happy the Master/Slave switch is back. The 580EX II is wonky about staying on slave (maybe mine&#039;s a reluctant sub?) Canon may have gotten my psychic stink-eye rage for the few seconds I have to toggle back to slave electronically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, no sarcasm, I am so f&#8217;ing happy the Master/Slave switch is back. The 580EX II is wonky about staying on slave (maybe mine&#8217;s a reluctant sub?) Canon may have gotten my psychic stink-eye rage for the few seconds I have to toggle back to slave electronically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Pennington</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53822</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Pennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53822</guid>
		<description>If Canon wants to come out of the dark ages with it&#039;s Speedlites and finally catch up to Nikon, it needs to really push the limit with this new one.  For starters, 105mm of zoom is pathetic - it needs to reach at least 200mm, to match the SB-900.  Full swivel in each direction would be nice, as would perhaps a 5th battery slot, for extra power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Canon wants to come out of the dark ages with it&#8217;s Speedlites and finally catch up to Nikon, it needs to really push the limit with this new one.  For starters, 105mm of zoom is pathetic &#8211; it needs to reach at least 200mm, to match the SB-900.  Full swivel in each direction would be nice, as would perhaps a 5th battery slot, for extra power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVERO</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53758</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVERO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53758</guid>
		<description>1Ds Mark IV   32mp  Body 
http://progear.co.nz/catalog.aspx?c=3022&amp;pageIndex=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1Ds Mark IV   32mp  Body<br />
<a href="http://progear.co.nz/catalog.aspx?c=3022&#038;pageIndex=0" rel="nofollow">http://progear.co.nz/catalog.aspx?c=3022&#038;pageIndex=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHRahmani</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53753</link>
		<dc:creator>MHRahmani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 14:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53753</guid>
		<description>a new means of communication would go dynamite.
i always wondered under which rock i should look for canon engineers. i mean...HOW DEAF CAN THEY BE??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a new means of communication would go dynamite.<br />
i always wondered under which rock i should look for canon engineers. i mean&#8230;HOW DEAF CAN THEY BE??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Einstein</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53742</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Einstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53742</guid>
		<description>14 pounds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14 pounds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hutjeflut</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53733</link>
		<dc:creator>hutjeflut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 15:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53733</guid>
		<description>surely do hope that this will push the prices on the 580 and 430 down a bit as they only have gotten more expencive here last year :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>surely do hope that this will push the prices on the 580 and 430 down a bit as they only have gotten more expencive here last year :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Althalus</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53731</link>
		<dc:creator>Althalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 09:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53731</guid>
		<description>Koala&#039;s have Syphilis so we&#039;d rather not touch them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koala&#8217;s have Syphilis so we&#8217;d rather not touch them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johny bottom</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53729</link>
		<dc:creator>johny bottom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 07:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53729</guid>
		<description>canon will eventually get a new flagship speedlight, but this isn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canon will eventually get a new flagship speedlight, but this isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Daguerre</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53725</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Daguerre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 02:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53725</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;udos. Please learn to spell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>K</i>udos. Please learn to spell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Daguerre</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53724</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Daguerre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 02:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53724</guid>
		<description>Not koalas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not koalas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Nara</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53721</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Nara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 00:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53721</guid>
		<description>SECOND COURTAIN with WIRELESS FLASH ETTL SYNC is a must. And i dont know about that 68 GN-

Im afraid about that GN68.. the power consumption have to be terrible. The Canon 580ex ii has a high demanding battery rate, and there is no battery that last long when flash its operating with ETTL Wireless as a master unit, and firing at the same time.

GN68 i guess that it will force you to buy the CANON EXTERNAL BATTERY PACK.. (that thing is overpriced by the way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SECOND COURTAIN with WIRELESS FLASH ETTL SYNC is a must. And i dont know about that 68 GN-</p>
<p>Im afraid about that GN68.. the power consumption have to be terrible. The Canon 580ex ii has a high demanding battery rate, and there is no battery that last long when flash its operating with ETTL Wireless as a master unit, and firing at the same time.</p>
<p>GN68 i guess that it will force you to buy the CANON EXTERNAL BATTERY PACK.. (that thing is overpriced by the way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/new-canon-speedlite/comment-page-1/#comment-53720</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 00:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4378#comment-53720</guid>
		<description>Same here.    I blew a couple of hours playing with it and researching before I found that out.

Second curtain sync -- not sure what this means in the context of a flash.

Wrt radio control -- whose flavor?  Radio Poppers&#039;?  Pocket Wizards?  Herringbone^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HCactus?  Elinchrom?  If they were to do RF triggering, I fear they&#039;d  make it proprietary :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here.    I blew a couple of hours playing with it and researching before I found that out.</p>
<p>Second curtain sync &#8212; not sure what this means in the context of a flash.</p>
<p>Wrt radio control &#8212; whose flavor?  Radio Poppers&#8217;?  Pocket Wizards?  Herringbone^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HCactus?  Elinchrom?  If they were to do RF triggering, I fear they&#8217;d  make it proprietary :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/49 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 539/539 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.canonrumors.com

Served from: www.canonrumors.com @ 2012-02-12 16:40:10 -->
