<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canon Rumors &#187; Nikon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonrumors.com/category/photography/nikon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sensors &amp; Lenses!</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/sensors-lenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/sensors-lenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon 1D Mark 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


From DXOMark
DXOMark has released their findings for the Nikon D3s and Canon 1D Mark IV.
It&#8217;s about a wash between the 2 cameras outside of what we already knew. The high ISO performance is superior out of the camera on the D3s and it&#8217;s lower megapixel/larger sensor.
Again, take it for what its worth.
Read More: Direct Comparison
Read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From DXOMark<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">DXOMark has released their findings for the Nikon D3s and Canon 1D Mark IV.</span></strong></p>
<div id="attachment_3692" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 526px"><img class="size-full wp-image-3692" title="dxobigcams" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dxobigcams.jpg" alt="" width="516" height="407" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Canon 1D Mark IV vs Nikon D3s</p></div>
<p>It&#8217;s about a wash between the 2 cameras outside of what we already knew. The high ISO performance is superior out of the camera on the D3s and it&#8217;s lower megapixel/larger sensor.</p>
<p>Again, take it for what its worth.</p>
<p><strong>Read More: </strong><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/DxOMark-reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-Mark-IV-vs-Nikon-D3s" target="_self"><strong>Direct Comparison</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Read More: </strong><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Canon/EOS-1D-Mark-IV" target="_self"><strong>Canon 1D Mark IV</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Read More: </strong><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Nikon/D3s" target="_self"><strong>Nikon D3s</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">The lens will retail for $2499 USD. I&#8217;m still searching for places in North America to preorder this thing. I have yet to see pricing in Canada.</span></strong></p>
<p><em>thanks Skip &amp; Adam</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/sensors-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Announcements</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/nikon-announcements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/nikon-announcements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24mm f/1.4
Nikon has finally started to address their prime shortfall with the introduction of the 24mm f/1.4. 
16-35 f/4 VR
This is a very interesting lens to me. Wouldn&#8217;t it be great to see a Canon 17-40 f/4L IS? I think so. I&#8217;d order one right now. 
Yes this is a Canon site.
Don&#8217;t hate me for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>24mm f/1.4<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Nikon has finally started to address their prime shortfall with the introduction of the 24mm f/1.4.</span> </strong></p>
<p><strong>16-35 f/4 VR<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">This is a very interesting lens to me. Wouldn&#8217;t it be great to see a Canon 17-40 f/4L IS? I think so. I&#8217;d order one right now.</span> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Yes this is a Canon site.<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Don&#8217;t hate me for posting Nikon news, these are interesting lenses.</span> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Read More @ <a href="http://www.nikonrumors.com" target="_self">Nikon Rumors</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/02/nikon-announcements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>178</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II Launched</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/nikkor-af-s-300mm-f2-8g-ed-vr-ii-launched/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/nikkor-af-s-300mm-f2-8g-ed-vr-ii-launched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Launched Quietly
Nikon has launched a new 300 f/2.8. They also launched a new 2x TC alongside it.
These companies seem to be launching stuff when it&#8217;s ready, instead of on a set schedule. That&#8217;s good for us!
Read More: http://nikonrumors.com/&#8230;..
cr

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Launched Quietly</strong><br />
Nikon has launched a new 300 f/2.8. They also launched a new 2x TC alongside it.</p>
<p>These companies seem to be launching stuff when it&#8217;s ready, instead of on a set schedule. That&#8217;s good for us!</p>
<p><strong>Read More: <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/12/10/af-s-nikkor-300mm-f2-8-g-ed-vr-ii-is-real.aspx" target="_self">http://nikonrumors.com/&#8230;..</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r<br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/nikkor-af-s-300mm-f2-8g-ed-vr-ii-launched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3s Specs?</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/nikon-d3s-specs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/nikon-d3s-specs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gah! A Nikon Post!
Yes, it matters what they&#8217;re up to. I only post Nikon stuff close to an announcement.
October 14/15, 2009
Nikon will be announcing the successor to the highly successful D3 this week. I&#8217;ve received some CR3 info as has Nikon Rumors who has received a lot more :)
The D3s Specs (NR)


Better ISO-performance (ISO 200-12800 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gah! A Nikon Post!</strong><br />
Yes, it matters what they&#8217;re up to. I only post Nikon stuff close to an announcement.</p>
<p><strong>October 14/15, 2009</strong><br />
Nikon will be announcing the successor to the highly successful D3 this week. I&#8217;ve received some CR3 info as has <a href="http://www.nikonrumors.com" target="_self">Nikon Rumors</a> who has received a lot more :)</p>
<p><strong>The D3s Specs (<a href="http://www.nikonrumors.com" target="_self">NR</a>)<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Better ISO-performance (ISO 200-12800 probably)</li>
<li>New 1.2 crop mode</li>
<li>Bigger buffer</li>
<li>Motion-Jpeg 720p (no 1080p!)</li>
<li>Improved  AF-ON button</li>
<li>Improved multi-dial</li>
<li>No 14 fps, I repeat no 14 fps</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The CR3 Specs I received (<a href="http://www.nikonrumors.com" target="_self">NR</a> has all the juice):</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Nikon D3s</li>
<li>Oct 14/15th</li>
<li>12 mp</li>
<li>ISO 102,400</li>
</ul>
<p>At the moment no new lenses will be launched with the D3s according to <a href="http://www.nikonrumors.com" target="_self">Nikon Rumors</a>.</p>
<p>Nikon is really upping the spec game if these rumors are true (outside of the 1080p omission).</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/nikon-d3s-specs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Nikon Night!</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=2236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joy!
Are you waiting for the launch of the D3000 and D300s? I am! New 70-200 possibly too.
Maybe Nikon will update the worst line of P&#38;S cameras on earth. Canon needs to be pushed a bit more in the segment.
Follow it at my pals site: http://nikonrumors.com
D3000: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073005nikond3000.asp
D300s: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073007nikond300s.asp
Hands on: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073006d300Shandson.asp
A new 70-200 and 18-200 as well.
Nothing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joy!</strong><br />
Are you waiting for the launch of the D3000 and D300s? I am! New 70-200 possibly too.</p>
<p>Maybe Nikon will update the worst line of P&amp;S cameras on earth. Canon needs to be pushed a bit more in the segment.</p>
<p><strong>Follow it at my pals site: <a href="http://www.nikonrumors.com" target="_self">http://nikonrumors.com</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>D3000: </strong><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073005nikond3000.asp" target="_self">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073005nikond3000.asp</a></p>
<p><strong>D300s</strong>: <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073007nikond300s.asp" target="_self">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073007nikond300s.asp</a><br />
<strong>Hands on:</strong> <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073006d300Shandson.asp" target="_self">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073006d300Shandson.asp</a></p>
<p>A new <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/af/zoom/af-s_70-200mmf_28g_vr2/index.htm" target="_self">70-200</a> and <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/af/dx/af-s_dx_18-200mmf_35-56g_ed_vr2/index.htm" target="_self">18-200</a> as well.</p>
<p>Nothing to change systems over. :)</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/its-nikon-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D5000?</title>
		<link>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/nikon-d5000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/nikon-d5000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=1722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the specs are tr.ue
If the specs for the D5000 are true, Canon appears to be getting their proverbial butt kicked from a perception standpoint.

Bali-angle LCD, 2.7 inch?
D movie image editing and enhanced scene mode
Silent Mode AF
11-point targetÃ‚Â trackingÃ‚Â AF
ISO3200highÃ‚Â sensitivity support

I&#8217;m not a spec person, but for an entry level camera.. specs can lead to sales. Consumers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If the specs are tr.ue</strong><br />
If the specs for the D5000 are true, Canon appears to be getting their proverbial butt kicked from a perception standpoint.</p>
<ul>
<li>Bali-angle LCD, 2.7 inch?</li>
<li>D movie image editing and enhanced scene mode</li>
<li>Silent Mode AF</li>
<li>11-point targetÃ‚Â trackingÃ‚Â AF</li>
<li>ISO3200highÃ‚Â sensitivity support</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m not a spec person, but for an entry level camera.. specs can lead to sales. Consumers love specs!</p>
<p><strong>From <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/" target="_self">Nikon Rumors</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/04/nikon-d5000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
