August 20, 2014, 10:34:55 PM

Author Topic: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]  (Read 40716 times)

Canon Rumors

  • Administrator
  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2562
    • View Profile
    • Canon Rumors
New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« on: June 19, 2013, 01:33:48 PM »
Announcements in the fall
We’re told that two new wide angle zooms for full frame will be coming from Canon in the next 6-8 months. At least one of them could be announced in Q4 of 2013.

One of the lenses will be the 14-24 f/2.8L, that will complete Canon’s run of lenses covering 14mm to 560mm.

The other will be a replacement to both the 16-35 f/2.8L II and the 17-40 f/4L. We’re told one of the configurations in test is an EF 16-50 f/4L IS.

This comes from a source that has been correct in the past, although timing is always hit and miss with Canon lenses.

cr

canonrumors.com

canon rumors FORUM

New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« on: June 19, 2013, 01:33:48 PM »

Knut Skywalker

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2013, 01:38:16 PM »
The 16-50 F4L IS sounds REALLY intriguing, lets hope it's around 1k and I'll buy it. :)
5D Mark II + Grip
50mm 1.4 and 100mm 2.0
430EX II and YN-565EX + 4 YN622c

Hannes

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2013, 01:39:00 PM »
That 16-50 could be very interesting for lots of people, good normal zoom for crop and nice and wide for FF. Let's just hope they make one

insanitybeard

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2013, 01:39:06 PM »
I await developments with interest.... would quite like to see an improved 17-40L or some derivative.
7D / EF-S 10-22 / 17-40L / 70-200 f4L IS / EF-S 60 macro

Dianoda

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2013, 01:47:28 PM »
A weather-sealed 16-50mm f/4 IS sounds wonderful.  As does the 14-24mm f/2.8 - but what'll she cost? $3K?
Current Kit: Some cameras and a bunch of lenses, maybe even a tripod or two

Dimson

  • SX50 HS
  • **
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2013, 01:54:01 PM »
a 16-50 with good corner to corner sharpness would be ideal for the landscape shooters out there. i think the prices will be in line with nikon's counterpart, maybe a little higher if they come up with a really flawless optical design

2200$ for 14-24 and around 1300$ for the 16-50 is what i would be willing to pay if they both perform up to expectations

also i would expect them to launch with a new high MP body

Terry Rogers

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 83
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2013, 01:56:12 PM »
I could see a 16-50 f/4IS sell well among rebel users intending to upgrade from kit and to full frame at a later date. Though it would cut into 17-55 2.8 IS sales. I suspect it would be priced similar to the 24-70 f4 IS. Not sure which I would prefer on a crop camera, a 16-50 or 24-70 given both at f/4. That would be a tough decision.
Rebel T3i,  EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS, 430 EX II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2013, 01:56:12 PM »

ahsanford

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2013, 02:05:34 PM »
Thoughts:

16-50 F/4 IS is an intriguing concept.  A good percentage of us prefer a wider walkaround than 24-70.  I certainly use the 24-50 side of my 24-70 more than the 50-70.  I hope this one gets the smaller/lighter L treatment that we just saw with the currently demonized (but still an interesting design) 24-70 F/4 IS.

The 14-24 has massive shoes to fill.  I am not starting a dynamic range / low ISO / Nikon D800 conversation, but landscape work has been one of the perceived chinks in the armor of Canon's armamentarium.   Something that punches its weight against Nikon's seemingly legendary 14-24, possibly coupled with a high MP sensor, would be two huge steps towards correcting that perception.

For those not visible to the performance of Nikon's homerun hitter, it pulls in resolution figures right up there with the Canon 70-200 F/2.8 IS II.  Landscape filter companies make products specifically to work around this lens' huge front element.  Canon guys use adapters to mount this on their bodies.  It's that amazing, apparently. 

I still don't understand why we don't have a breathtakingly sharp autofocusing prime for landscape work.  I am drowning in a sea of ultrawide zooms (soft in corners), arty huge aperture L lenses (ditto), tilt-shift (no AF), and Zeiss glass (no AF).  I appreciate landscapes ==> tripods ==> liveview ==> no need for AF, but some folks just want to snap a picture of a coastline or a mountain range without all that fanfare.  I'd pay $1-2K for a breathtakingly sharp autofocusing 24mm L that didn't shoot itself in the foot (i.e. corners) to offer side a wide aperture.  Negative points if you tell me to just buy the 24-70 II.   :P

- A

ahsanford

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2013, 02:08:48 PM »
I could see a 16-50 f/4IS sell well among rebel users intending to upgrade from kit and to full frame at a later date. Though it would cut into 17-55 2.8 IS sales. I suspect it would be priced similar to the 24-70 f4 IS. Not sure which I would prefer on a crop camera, a 16-50 or 24-70 given both at f/4. That would be a tough decision.


Good comments.  Tough call on walkaround length -- I think both are attractive for different reasons.

As for supplanting 17-55 business, I am not so sure.  If this is simply an L refresh of the 17-40 with a little more length, you may be right.  But if this is a beastmaster 2.5 pound lens with crazy IQ and top-end weather sealing, it may get priced out of the 17-55's territory. 

- A

LetTheRightLensIn

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3431
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2013, 02:08:53 PM »
The 16-50 F4L IS sounds REALLY intriguing, lets hope it's around 1k and I'll buy it. :)

+1

let's hope it does 24mm as crisply, edge to edge as the 24-70 II

ahsanford

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2013, 02:10:39 PM »
The 16-50 F4L IS sounds REALLY intriguing, lets hope it's around 1k and I'll buy it. :)

+1

let's hope it does 24mm as crisply, edge to edge as the 24-70 II

That's the elephant in the room, isn't it?  The new 24-70 II is such a monster that landscape shooters who own that would need a really compelling reason to look at anything other than a stellar 14-24.

- A

LetTheRightLensIn

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3431
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #11 on: June 19, 2013, 02:11:40 PM »
Thoughts:

16-50 F/4 IS is an intriguing concept.  A good percentage of us prefer a wider walkaround than 24-70.  I certainly use the 24-50 side of my 24-70 more than the 50-70.  I hope this one gets the smaller/lighter L treatment that we just saw with the currently demonized (but still an interesting design) 24-70 F/4 IS.

The 14-24 has massive shoes to fill.  I am not starting a dynamic range / low ISO / Nikon D800 conversation, but landscape work has been one of the perceived chinks in the armor of Canon's armamentarium.   Something that punches its weight against Nikon's seemingly legendary 14-24, possibly coupled with a high MP sensor, would be two huge steps towards correcting that perception.

For those not visible to the performance of Nikon's homerun hitter, it pulls in resolution figures right up there with the Canon 70-200 F/2.8 IS II.  Landscape filter companies make products specifically to work around this lens' huge front element.  Canon guys use adapters to mount this on their bodies.  It's that amazing, apparently. 

I still don't understand why we don't have a breathtakingly sharp autofocusing prime for landscape work.  I am drowning in a sea of ultrawide zooms (soft in corners), arty huge aperture L lenses (ditto), tilt-shift (no AF), and Zeiss glass (no AF).  I appreciate landscapes ==> tripods ==> liveview ==> no need for AF, but some folks just want to snap a picture of a coastline or a mountain range without all that fanfare.  I'd pay $1-2K for a breathtakingly sharp autofocusing 24mm L that didn't shoot itself in the foot (i.e. corners) to offer side a wide aperture.  Negative points if you tell me to just buy the 24-70 II.   :P

- A

Did you ever consider just getting the 24-70 II?

Tabor Warren Photography

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 147
  • I want to go shoot something with a Canon...
    • View Profile
    • Tabor Warren Photography
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2013, 02:16:31 PM »
This announcement could not have had better timing. I am looking at upgrading my 17-40L within the next year. I've been on the fence about just buying a 16-35 ii just to play with it, but I will hold off until one or both of these are announced. The 14-24 2.8 is really what I'm after, but I would consider the latter depending on price. Wahoo!

-Tabor
Bodies: 5D mk III x2, 5D mk. II, 7D, & 60D
Lenses: 17-40mm f/4L, 24mm f/1.4L, 35mm f/1.4L, 70-200mm f/2.8L ISII, 85 f/1.2L II, & 100mm f/2.8L
Flashes: 600EX-RT x2 & 430 EX II | To see my work head on over to http://photosbytabor.com

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2013, 02:16:31 PM »

preppyak

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 757
    • View Profile
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #13 on: June 19, 2013, 02:23:40 PM »
'd pay $1-2K for a breathtakingly sharp autofocusing 24mm L that didn't shoot itself in the foot (i.e. corners) to offer side a wide aperture.  Negative points if you tell me to just buy the 24-70 II.
Except they already make that. Just tape your 24-70mm L II into the 24mm position and you're set. You don't want it to go to f/1.4 apparently, so it doesnt, it does f/2.8 sharp corner to corner. Sure, it'd be great if it was $500 cheaper, but thats the price of sharpness

Dylan777

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3852
    • View Profile
    • http://dylannguyen.smugmug.com/browse
Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #14 on: June 19, 2013, 02:43:31 PM »
Where can I place a pre-order for 14-24 :o
Body: 1DX -- 5D III
Zoom: 24-70L II -- 70-200L f2.8 IS II
Prime: 40mm -- 85L II -- 135L -- 400L f2.8 IS II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« Reply #14 on: June 19, 2013, 02:43:31 PM »