January 26, 2015, 11:54:48 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - m

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
Lenses / Re: The Canon EF 50mm f/1.0L
« on: January 19, 2015, 05:43:52 PM »
And you attached it to a new small rebel with an X ... wait ... what?

So unless this is a very sneaky introduction of the mythical EOS 3D  ;D, they will use 2 cameras to get the 3D effect, right?

I always wondered how far (close) both cameras have to be apart to sell the effect.
It probably depends on the focal length.

EOS Bodies / Re: Sample Images From the EOS 7D Mark II
« on: September 19, 2014, 10:59:27 AM »
What's that black dot with light blue surrounding in the 7D2 file?

EOS Bodies / Re: 7DII No Wifi
« on: September 15, 2014, 05:22:49 PM »
Dare I say it, I'm pretty disappointed that there is no Wifi in the 7DII.

This topic came to my attention recently and I also had hopes for wifi in the 7D2.
However, the camera seems to be an outdoor/sports camera, which is probably the reason why there's GPS and no wifi.

It's a shame that the dedicated wifi grips are so expensive.

Photography Technique / Re: POLL: Do you crop (and why)?
« on: September 11, 2014, 02:55:59 PM »
From all the possible directions to point your camera at, ...
From all the possible positions to place your camera, ...
From all the possible focal lengths, ...
From all the hopefully many moments that make up your lifetime, ...

... you only pick a single one when taking an image.

How can throwing away pixels in post processing be an issue if one throws away so much else before?

Lenses / Re: The New Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pancake
« on: September 11, 2014, 02:00:13 PM »
Are you sure this is not the rumored new body cap?
Oh wait, there's an AF/MF switch, nevermind...

Any information on the price?

Lenses / Re: Samyang 12mm F2.8 Full Frame Fish Eye
« on: September 10, 2014, 08:21:20 AM »
I looked at the sample image:

Being a big image, at first only the top half was displayed and I thought, wow, this is a wide lens.
Then the bottom half popped in.  :o Sweet. 8)

Time to buy some nice shoes that look good when they are visible in the frame.

Technical Support / Re: maybe a stupid question - noise and human eyes
« on: September 09, 2014, 04:58:49 PM »
but can someone explain why we don´t see noise?

Ever noticed the reduced saturation of colors when looking in the dark?
Those two image sensors in your head have different types of pixels, some good for color, some good for low light.

It's not like "hey, our sensor has a lot of noise" but instead "hey, our sensor goes monochrome above ISO 6400*, because the color pixels stop working"
Quite a leica-esque feature if you ask me.  :P

*not your actual ISO rating

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Strangest Tripod Substitute ?....
« on: September 05, 2014, 08:09:47 AM »
A brick.
"Who needs a real tripod?".
My question was answered by the camera hitting the concrete floor the moment I finished asking  :-X

A drunk human.
Pro tip: if they are so drunk that they are not able to push the button, set the camera to self timer, stick it into their hands and roughly point them at the group you want to be a part of yourself.

Trust me, nobody blinks as all the subjects are anticipating the moment the camera falls.
But it didn't! And I got a nice group shot including myself.

...after only 2 trials  ;D

HDR - High Dynamic Range / Re: Is my Mountain shot HDR or not?
« on: September 03, 2014, 05:48:08 AM »
HDR is a relative term depending on your camera.

You achieved that with one shot.
Some other camera might need multiple exposures to get the same thing.

The question is how much dynamic range can your camera capture?
How much dynamic range is required to capture the scene? From darkest shadows to brightest highlights.

The important question is if you like the image or not.
Often times I see pictures employing some kind of HDR-esque techniques to be put in their own category, as if the only point of taking those pictures was to apply those techniques to them.

If you had to put your photos into categories, would you do so by having a category for each used focal length?
Or tag each image with the photoshop tools you used?
Or would you rather sort them by content instead?

Is your mountain HDR or not?
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn.
It's a nice looking image. That's important.

Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: September 01, 2014, 07:55:55 PM »
great images, quite the evidence one should spend more time outside

EOS Bodies / Re: Are These The EOS 7D Mark II Specifications?
« on: August 22, 2014, 03:04:19 PM »
Could somebody please explain to me what this is?

Lens electronic MF

Does this mean I can rotate a dial on the body to do manual focusing?
What would that be useful for?

Overall this seems less exciting than the previous rumors.

If the protector is glued onto the screen, and got that bump then the screen got the same bump.
But the protector is just a piece of thin plastic, so it got severely deformed.
Would the display look the same without the protector?

Somebody with several displays should compare the display alone and with a protector under a controlled bump.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sony A77II
« on: August 10, 2014, 07:57:09 PM »
I'm not sure what I should take out of this video or if I understand it.

In the first half it shows the possibility to automatically change active focusing points according to the movement of the subject.
That's sound interesting indeed.

The second half seems to have the goal of convincing me that any other AF technique is useless in this situation.
The argument is that the focus point fails to "catch" the subject.
However, I don't see him pointing that focus point at a subject.
It's moving around the field and it doesn't come to me as a surprise that it doesn't focus at anything particular if you don't point it at anything particular.

Furthermore, the first demonstration of the tracking AF point is initiated by focusing with exactly that same AF point.
So all the arguments he rises in the video against a single AF point still hold true against the tracking AF, as it needs an initial "catch" to get started.
If the red player was slightly out of the AF point when he half-pressed to focus, it would have locked onto the background as it did later in the video. The tracking AF point would be of no use in this situation as it's purpose is to keep something in focus, not get it there in the first place.

That's at least my impression. Please somebody explain this to me.

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 11-24 f/2.8L Coming [CR1]
« on: August 07, 2014, 03:59:43 PM »
Since no one else has said it...  "This one goes to eleven."

I can totally see that being the final sentence in the meeting room the lead to the decision to build this lens.  8)  ;D

I wonder why it goes to f2.8 though.
There should be a lot in focus for these focal lengths, so is it just to get extra light?
I have the feeling this would be a good choice for landscape photographers, but what do they want with f2.8?
Wouldn't they rather have IS and f4 to enable better hand held shooting?
Or just f4 without IS to make the lens lighter?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12