May 23, 2013, 07:45:23 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lol

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 29
1
Lenses / Re: Best fisheye for canon.
« on: May 18, 2013, 06:31:25 AM »
Attached shows the coverage of the Samyang on a full frame body. You can kinda see the image circle it gives which you can expand into if you cut off the hood. There are some examples out on the internet of people who have cut off the hood.

The latest Samyang fisheye has a removable hood.
Thanks for the info. I didn't realise they had updated the design since I got mine early on. That makes it a bit more interesting for full frame use, even if it doesn't cover the whole sensor.

2
Lenses / Re: Infra red filter - question
« on: May 18, 2013, 06:27:18 AM »
If you have an unmodified body, the Hoya R72 filter is the standard way of doing it, requiring long exposures. You can find unbranded filters off ebay at much lower cost too, but their responses are a bit hit and miss. Key to success is cutting out enough visible red leaving the IR intact. One IR filter I bought off ebay passed too much red so you just ended up with a red image on an unmodified body. With a modified one, the IR response was again enough to swamp the visible red and you still had IR effect.

An even lower cost option is to use lighting gels. Stack some layers of primary red and congo blue. The red and blue will block visible, but both are designed to pass IR so lights don't overheat. About two or 3 layers of each gives a similar effect to R72.

What I did before was to get an 300D which is dirt cheap now, and an unbranded filter from ebay. Using a glass cutter I could cut the filter into the right size to fit over the sensor. Instructions on how to take apart a 300D are on lifepixel. A bit of improvisation was needed to remove and swap the filter with my home cut one (yes, I used tape, see attached image). Put it back and by chance AF was "close enough" for slower lenses to still use. Exposure was wildly different from normal though so that required manual setting, but thankfully doesn't change too much when outdoors. Big drawback was dust gets everywhere and if it's between filter and sensor, you're not going to get it out short of taking it apart again.

Attached example was taken using the modified 300D, Samyang 8mm fisheye.

3
Lenses / Re: Best fisheye for canon.
« on: May 17, 2013, 03:29:55 AM »
The Rokinon (a.k.a. Samyang) is a crop sensor lens. It'll fit on a full frame camera but you get a small rectangular image due to the built in lens hood. If you cut off the hood, you get a cropped circle in the middle instead, but still wont cover the whole sensor. Note the lens cap fits onto the hood if you're considering that. All in, I wouldn't recommend this lens for a full frame sensor, unless you have a very particular need for it to fill. It is great value for crop bodies though.

On the other hand, it's on sale for $229 at adorama today.
Attached shows the coverage of the Samyang on a full frame body. You can kinda see the image circle it gives which you can expand into if you cut off the hood. There are some examples out on the internet of people who have cut off the hood.

4
EOS-M / Re: Metabones speed booster for the M
« on: May 16, 2013, 03:20:33 PM »
If you compare against other mirrorless systems, their additional lenses didn't exactly appear quickly either. It's early days for Canon, even if they're late to the game.

As for making one for the Nikon 1, I find that extremely unlikely. The bigger level of reduction required would be exponentially more difficult if it is even possible in any sane way.

Making one for the M shouldn't be too difficult assuming the mount distances are compatible. It's just a matter of there being enough market for it.

5
Lenses / Re: Best fisheye for canon.
« on: May 16, 2013, 07:49:56 AM »
The Rokinon (a.k.a. Samyang) is a crop sensor lens. It'll fit on a full frame camera but you get a small rectangular image due to the built in lens hood. If you cut off the hood, you get a cropped circle in the middle instead, but still wont cover the whole sensor. Note the lens cap fits onto the hood if you're considering that. All in, I wouldn't recommend this lens for a full frame sensor, unless you have a very particular need for it to fill. It is great value for crop bodies though.

6
EOS-M / Re: Subsequrnt m naming...
« on: May 04, 2013, 04:25:48 AM »
M mark II
M 100, M 200, etc.

7
Personally I look at this a little differently. Don't worry too far in the future, look at what's best for the near future. Even if the worst were to happen with a future model, you can continue to use it with existing equipment for its working life. Unless they release a firmware to break it...

8
Lenses / Re: A review of the Samyang Tilt Shift
« on: May 01, 2013, 07:44:45 AM »
I'm more concerned about distortion than outright resolution given the insane amount the 14mm had. Thankfully they report 2.5% barrel which is not great, but not too bad either. The Canon mk2 was under 1% barrel as measured by photozone though.

9
EOS Bodies / Re: The Future of EOS M [CR1]
« on: April 26, 2013, 07:37:42 AM »
I got the feeling the existing M was Canon reacting slowly to mirrorless, and when they eventually decided to join in, they wanted to get a product out faster (but still far later than everyone else), than get it out done well. They certainly have room for performance improvement and need to get competitive at least. To say they will aim for class leading is a bit of a challenge, one I'm not sure they will be able to reach. But for now we have to bare in mind it is a CR1 source saying that, not Canon.

Looking at the others, micro4/3 was slow AF when it first came out and they certainly sped it up. Same with Fuji. Can't remember about NEX, don't think they're that fast but they're not that bad either. And about the only good thing about the Nikon 1 was the AF, so that's more the exception than the rule. You would have thought that with Canon joining so late with the M they could have got it right first time...

10
PowerShot / Re: SX50 outperforming 5DIII +100-400mm
« on: April 04, 2013, 07:02:15 PM »
Ooh, this thread timing is great. Only today I was wondering what's around in high(er) quality longer range zooms. I had a work trip overseas next week, and was thinking of playing tourist. Now last time I did carry 7D + 70+300L but the size still was a bit much when trying to travel light. And my compact (Sony HX9V) is ok for a pocket camera, but I wanted both more zoom and quality.

Having looked at those raw samples above, I think I'd be happy with those results and accept that tracking AF might not be like a DSLR.

11
Landscape / Re: Post Your Comet Pictures
« on: April 04, 2013, 04:34:08 PM »
I didn't want to lose any light since I couldn't use longer exposures on this occasion. I can't remember if the 135/2 did improve much stopped down now... and when you say CA filter, do you mean the optical sort or software sort? Effectively I did my own version of a software approach for this image. I haven't looked at exactly how the optical ones work but presume they filter out certain wavelengths so as to reduce the effect. But I'm not sure they're applicable in this scenario anyway.

12
Landscape / Re: Post Your Comet Pictures
« on: April 04, 2013, 03:56:14 PM »
I did most of the processing in PixInsight. I made flats to correct for the vignetting of the 135/2 wide open and calibrated, aligned and stacked in there. Then some cosmetic fixes in PSE afterwards. The 135/2 isn't great for OSC astro imaging. The red focus is quite a bit off compared to green and blue, so you get nasty red halos around bright stars. I'm wondering if the new Zeiss 135/2 APO would be better, but it isn't at a price that means I will find out any time soon. The Canon 135/2 does ok for narrowband imaging though.

13
Landscape / Re: Post Your Comet Pictures
« on: April 04, 2013, 01:46:15 PM »
Canon 600D unmodified. Astronomik CLS-CCD filter (reduces impact of sodium lighting). Canon 135mm f/2L at f/2. ISO3200. 50 shots stacked of 5s exposure each.

I only took a fixed tripod so had to keep exposures short to reduce the impact of star trailing. The fizzy blob above the comet is Andromeda galaxy. The two should be very close in the sky around now, if I get another clear night I'll give it another go.

14
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D L Announced, Shipping in May
« on: April 01, 2013, 09:07:40 AM »
Actually, this could be handy for all... ever wished you could have a camera in each hand at the same time? With that, you could!

15
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D L Announced, Shipping in May
« on: April 01, 2013, 08:46:00 AM »
It would probably sell ok if they actually made this. If that happened, it would be interesting to see sales numbers relative to right handed ones, as it may indicate if photographers fit the ratio of the general population or not. However it could be skewed if there aren't other models available so ending up drawing more than its share.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 29