October 22, 2014, 08:15:41 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tron

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 124
1
Lenses / Re: Travel gear thoughts...
« on: Today at 12:56:17 PM »
Getting just 16-35 and 70-300 will only result of changing lenses frustratingly often.

2
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon 750D real world review
« on: October 20, 2014, 08:27:24 AM »
Quote
The D750 isn't any better then the 5D3 at high ISO.
Actually, it is at least 2/3 of a stop better. I sold my 6D and several L lens, about 2 weeks ago, and purchased the D750. The D750 is cleaner at high ISO's than my former 6D was, by at least 1/3 or so of a stop. I can push high ISO images much better with the D750 than I could with the 6D.

Still trying to figure out which Nikon lens are worth a crap, most of the Nikon primes are slower to focus than the Canon counterparts.
You sold your 6D and L lenses for 1/3 or so of a stop? :o

And now you are trying to fgure out which of the slower focusing Nikon lenses are at least worth a crap?  :o :o

+1000

now now chaps he actually sold it for 2/3rds of a stop
The comparison was with 6D not 5D3. But even if we take "at least" into consideration we may be talking of a 1/2 stop difference... Questions remain...

3
Lenses / Re: Travel gear thoughts...
« on: October 20, 2014, 08:05:40 AM »
Usually I travel light:  2 5DMkIIIs, 24-70 2.8 II, 16-35 f/4S IS, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 300 f/4L, 500 f/4L IS II, 17TS-E, EF1.4XIII, EF2XIII, 14mm 2.8L II, 2 tripods and a flash. 

OK I am joking!   ;D ;D ;D

I would take one 5DMkIII, 16-35 f/4 IS, 24-70 2.8 II and 70-200 f/4L IS

You see? Now the above setup seems light!!! ;D

If I had to reduce the setup more I would remove the 70-200 f/4L IS and I maybe I would replace the 24-70 with the 24-105 L (not 100% sure though...)

Finally, if I had to take one lens it would be a dilemma between 24-70 2.8 L II and 24-105 f/4L IS...

4
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon 750D real world review
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:24:10 AM »
Quote
The D750 isn't any better then the 5D3 at high ISO.
Actually, it is at least 2/3 of a stop better. I sold my 6D and several L lens, about 2 weeks ago, and purchased the D750. The D750 is cleaner at high ISO's than my former 6D was, by at least 1/3 or so of a stop. I can push high ISO images much better with the D750 than I could with the 6D.

Still trying to figure out which Nikon lens are worth a crap, most of the Nikon primes are slower to focus than the Canon counterparts.
You sold your 6D and L lenses for 1/3 or so of a stop? :o

And now you are trying to fgure out which of the slower focusing Nikon lenses are at least worth a crap?  :o :o

5
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon 750D real world review
« on: October 20, 2014, 06:56:47 AM »
mabye, but i often wish i could somehow get just 1-2 stop more DR out of my canon RAWs.
would not give me a proper exposed outside but made things way better.
it´s seems nikon can do that without a problem.

then look at the 5D Mk3 picture in the review, they are unusable.

Have you tried MagicLantern's DualISO?

Use of ML can damage your camera and they say so. It is not something that just "anyone" or "everyone" should use.
Sure, and no software manufacturer accepts any liability for damage done.

But, do you have real example or you just copy what they say ?

Having said that it is better to have more DR from the start.

6
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: IS on when filming on tripod?
« on: October 20, 2014, 06:29:22 AM »
I've shot some long exposure scenes that were absolutely ruined by having IS turned on with my 70-200 2.8L IS II lens :(.  I wouldn't trust it at all, even if it claims to have tripod detection.

The effect must be different with video vs photo. I've filmed a lot on a tripod with that lens, and never saw a problem with the video. I have seen problems on long exposure photos though. And I've seen problems with the 24-105 when IS is on using a tripod. Also the 35 f/2 IS has never given me a problem with IS on.
The issue is with speeds of many seconds. If you are shooting video with say a 1/50 speed then it is much different.

FYI the instructions in lens booklet (70-200 f/4 IS) was to turn off IS in Bulb mode. Shooting many seconds even without Bulb mode is similar...

7
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: IS on when filming on tripod?
« on: October 18, 2014, 07:23:29 AM »
I've shot some long exposure scenes that were absolutely ruined by having IS turned on with my 70-200 2.8L IS II lens :(.  I wouldn't trust it at all, even if it claims to have tripod detection.
+1 Same with 70-200 f/4L IS. It had to turn it off to remove blur in a few seconds tripod shooting.

8
The following is my kind of summing up the pros and cons:

birds: 7DII unless in very low light conditions in which case 5DIII

action: 7DII or 5DIII depending whether you are focal length limited or not

astro: 6D maybe a little but how much less noisier is it?

landscape: 6D,5DIII

portraits: 5DIII (the AF system for off center focusing in an eye beats 6D)

night and weddings\events photography: 6D,5DIII practically equal

I do have a 5DIII and after I sold my 5DII I was thinking about a 6D until I thought:

1. I will always try to decide which camera with which lens. Since you are thinking 2 different
   type of cameras (1 FF, 1 APS-C) you will possibly do not have such dilemmas

2. It is nice for both cameras to be exactly the same in handling/buttons/menus/capabilities

But maybe apart from an addon in the joystick in 7DII I guess handling will be the same.

Still I didn't regret my 2nd 5DIII. I believe that no matter what you choose, you will enjoy your new camera(s).  :)

9

how many have used flash (even more shot with a speed higher than 1/250?)

How many doesn't matter - want to fill the shadows in even one picture with some distance to the subject?

But if you want to think about numbers it's the same idea as the "they took sports pictures w/o autofocus"-fallacy. Rather ask: How many opportunities were missed because of technical limitations?
Exactly! RX10 has many limitations in that part! (sports)

10

 Flash Sync Speed: HSS is supported on many cameras/flashes combinations


HSS eats power like crazy. You loose three quarters just for turning it on, and then the output stays constant in relation to the ambient light.
The leaf shutter otoh sets the target aperture, giving you a 4-5 stop advantage. Contrasting to HSS you also benefit from ISOs above base sensitivity. You couldn't replicate that with 600RTs because the control system can't handle as many units as that would require. Not to mention the logistic challenges, or the implications when not relying only on speedlights.
You'd need at least 100kg worth of speedlights  and batteries to match a single, easily backpack transportable, Move1200 - just for perspective. And that doesn't include stands or clamps. For B1s it works out similarily.
Even so how much is flash used by ... travel photographers? If you browse his site's photos

http://bobkrist.com/photography/

how many have used flash (even more shot with a speed higher than 1/250?)



11
Some observations:

1 . I have seen his website and I truly liked his photos. However, were they taken with a Sony RX10? I do not think so!

2. The 4 arguments are ridiculous:

 Silent shooting: It can be accomplished through LV as another forum member said or approximated using 5DMk3's or 6D's silent mode shooting. In addition many Nikon models sport silent shooting modes.

 Flash Sync Speed: HSS is supported on many cameras/flashes combinations

 10fps: I will not even bother to mention which models are capable of that. I will simply say that this is most usefull in sports. But RX10 is an up to 200mm (35mm equivalent camera). I do not thing it is enough for sports.
 It is obvious he didn't use it in practice. Otherwise he would comment in AF tracking capabilities in combination with 10fps shooting.

 No sensor dust ever: It is obvious that he didn't use the very latest models with anti-dust mechanisms.

3. No mention of High ISO or low light IQ in comparison to a modern FF camera.

12
Canon General / Re: How Soon We Forget!
« on: October 10, 2014, 07:04:52 AM »
[* EOS 620 (1/4000s shutter, 1/250 x-sync) and Canon technical date back ... great camera. You could simply exchange the grip for a bigger one for bigger hands, nowadays you have to buy a semi-pro camera for that :-p ... http://mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/eos/eoscamera/620/
 
* EOS RT: nearly zero shutter lag and you can see the moment the picture is taken which all other dslrs don't manage because of the mirror blackout. Loved it ... http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/eos/eoscamera/EOS-RT/

[
WOW! EOS 620 was my first Canon camera and RT my second one (without selling the first one)  :)

13
EOS Bodies / Re: Poll: Would you buy a high MP Canon EOS 5DIV?
« on: October 08, 2014, 08:48:39 AM »
The 5D line has always been an event photographers camera and thats who buys them. The files as they are are a good size, making the MP 30+will increase the files by a 1/3 and after editing a raw and saving it as a PSD they are already in the 250mb range which is more than enough. You can only fit 1000 images on a 32gb card so at a typical wedding your shooting 64gbs as it is shooting redundancy is 128gb. It basically means more money to be spent on storage reducing profit margins. When your not printing past A2 or even A1 that space is wasted. Granted it gives you room to crop, but most event shooters don't shoot to crop just adds time in post.

its not a landscape camera and most event shooters don't need that kind of resolution.

The high MP camera designation was always the 1DS and I hope that continues or I for one as an event photographer will be disappointed as Canon won't make a camera for lets be honest the main area photography is still commercial. Landscape photography is a niche, there are not many photographers making a living from it anymore.

I would be happy with a modest boost to 24 or even staying the same with an improvement in noise performance and adding a few other features like GPS and possibly making the camera a little lighter.

+10000 and that's what my money (literally) is on
I agree and I would love seeing a new 5DMkIV with same Mpixels, increased DR, lower noise, even higher ISO capabilities and 1 or2 fps more and the new AF of 7DII. Plus some basic firmware related tweeks like Auto ISO in manual mode just like 1Dx's. As I have 2 5DMkIIIs and no other camera I use them for everything.

OK: 1. I am an amateur and 2. I do not need to shoot sports.

But: 5DMkIII does well for landscapes (yes, landscapes), portraits, events and astrophotography.

14
EOS Bodies / Re: Is Canon now two generations behind Nikon?
« on: October 07, 2014, 06:52:45 AM »
Ican't speak to D800 because I have never used one, but my take on the great 5dM3 is this . . . when you make something that takes that IQ and feels so good in your hand . . . why would you want to change it.

+1. I won't.
I agree. I had a 5DMk3 which was feeling lonely so I got a second 5DMk3 to keep it company  ;D

15
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Great interview about the Samsung NX1
« on: October 07, 2014, 06:50:51 AM »
Interesting interview indeed.

In fact there is a CR2 that 7DMkIV will be like that...  ;D ;D ;D

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 124