Messages

1

Lenses / Re: 24-70 f/2.8L vs. 24-105 f/4L

« on: March 03, 2012, 05:21:29 PM »

I'd also look at the Sigma 28-75.
There's some variability between copies, but if you get a good one, you're lucky and still have $800 in your pocket.
http://www.amazon.com/review/R2GNWJ4M60OFY0/ref=cm_srch_res_rtr_alt_1

2

Lenses / Re: 24-70 f/2.8L vs. 24-105 f/4L

« on: March 03, 2012, 05:12:32 PM »

I'd agree that a fast prime would be a better choice considering you already have a great lens with more versatility than the 24-70L.

3

Portrait / Re: Portraits of my "Better" half

« on: December 22, 2011, 05:08:12 PM »

Unedited (little warm- but that's AWB in Program mode and Portrait style):

Canon 50mm 1.8 at F3.5 ISO 400 on a 60D

4

Landscape / Re: Water Reflections

« on: December 20, 2011, 09:50:42 PM »

Bigelow Pond in Union, CT. September 2005 with a Canon SD400.