« on: November 14, 2013, 01:17:15 PM »
3K lens!!!! I will just stick with my $300 Samyang 14mm.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
It seems I am always shooting something in low light. It seems that shooting in the late evening or inside without a flash is something I am always doing. Sure motion blur and such is a problem but I could see a use for IS.
It is coming.If the price tag of the Canon 24-70mm IS is 3500, Sigma and Tamron will really appreciate Canon to help their business.
Canon wanted to see if you would buy a Non IS version for $2200 before they release a $3500 IS version.
It would have been hard to go from a $1400 version 1 to a $3500 version II IS. Much easier now that they have you prepared.
This graph will be different when you found canonrummorsSo true....
Do you mind, sharing your experience with it?
I've not tried it yet, but I am VERY anxious to have ML get the firmware for the 5D3 out of *alpha*...so I can try it for RAW video.
I very interested in A7, but there is still some doubt that i cannot confirm from the google search,
1) can i know what brand of mount make it can use canon lens ?
2) If use canon lens will it fullframe compatible (no vignette) and able to autofocus ?
He still can get Tamron 24-70 VC for 1.3K. It's sharper than Canon 24-70 MK1 and comes with VC though it's not as sharp as Canon 24-70 MK2. He also could wait for Sigma 24-70 f/2 OS. I believe Canon 24-70 IS version will be priced about 2.8K.Another $400 off and add IS and I might be interested.Well ... I guess you are entitled to your dreams.
I think I have mentioned this already. But look around 11:25 in this video. EF 17-40L being used and autofocused on the A7R.
This is a right price for me. However, I will just wait for 24-70 f/2.8 IS @ 2.5K.
Gonna be a long wait (unless you believe M.ST, which would raise the number of believers to two, you plus himself).