May 25, 2013, 12:09:35 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jabbott

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
Here is a free way to do it that allows you to get the results into Excel or LibreOffice.  You can also use it to study other things like what apertures, lenses, ISO speeds and shutter speeds you are using.  It also works with RAW files.

1. On Windows, download and install exiftool, GNU coreutils and GNU grep and add them to your executable search path.  On OS X, just install exiftool.  The packages for each are located here:
http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/coreutils.htm
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/grep.htm

If you are using Windows and have cygwin installed, you can skip downloading the GNU utilities as you will likely already have them installed.

2. Using the command prompt, change directories to the one above your photo library.  Run the following command sequence:
exiftool -r path1 path2 pathn | grep "Focal Length" | grep equivalent > focal-lengths.txt

Where path1 path2 pathn are the names of the photo library directories you want to analyze.  You can specify one or multiple directories.  If you shoot RAW+JPG, you can add "-ext CR2" or "-ext JPG" to the exiftool command above to make exiftool only look at the photo type you want.  As long as you run exiftool without destructive parameters, it will open your images read-only.  '-r' just tells it to recurse through all subdirectories underneath the starting path or paths.  The grep commands are used to only send the focal length information to the focal-lengths.txt file.  With some tweaking you could alter this step to study apertures used, etc.  To get an idea of what exiftool reports, try running it on a single photo file without the grep commands, and be sure to scroll up as there is a lot of output.

3. After that command finishes, run the following command sequence:
cat focal-lengths.txt | cut -d : -f 3- | cut -d " " -f -2 | sort -n | uniq -c > focal-lengths.csv

Note that Windows has its own sort.exe so you may need to specify the full path to the coreutils sort.exe file.

4.  Then open focal-lengths.csv in Excel or LibreOffice and use fixed-width delimiters to split the file into two columns.

5.  Select column A (which has the counts for each focal length) and move it to the right of column B (the focal lengths).  At least in LibreOffice, this is necessary for the graph to plot correctly, otherwise the axes will be flipped.

6.  Select both columns and then generate an X-Y scatter graph, and if desired, have it use lines instead of points.

7.  Add axis labels as appropriate.

2
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III with Continuous RAW Video Recording
« on: May 15, 2013, 12:10:52 AM »
Looks like someone who doesn't know what they are doing with RAW... The EOSHD clip is much better.  I still want to see people's faces.
Did you see the clouds?  Those would likely be blown out with regular video.

3
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III with Continuous RAW Video Recording
« on: May 14, 2013, 10:50:08 AM »
Newmann Films just posted a really neat 5D3 RAW video example here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm8A7FH2Qg4

4
So maybe there is a 1.2.2 firmware update in our near future.
Or in another six months...  grumble grumble

5
Sports / Re: Cycling
« on: April 28, 2013, 09:48:27 PM »
Great shots!  Upon first glance I thought that the first photo was of a tight peloton, until I looked more closely at the photo and read your post.  Nicely done.  I wonder if you could do this sort of service for pro cyclists and runners so they can more closely examine their form?

6
thank you for giving us your permission ::)
I was referring to Mt. Spokane...  relax people!   ;D

7
there are many other reputable dealers out there who have never had this kind of problem. 
 
Can you name even one??
I can't prove a negative.  That said, I don't recall ever seeing news articles about other dealers (B&H, Adorama, Beach Camera, Amazon, etc.) who had an employee caught selling a used camera as new.  Not only was DigitalRev selling a used camera as new, it was used in the rain by their reviewer.  He also put his hand down his pants down while handling the camera.  That is disgusting in my opinion.  You are free to shop there all you want... however I will not.

8
DigitalRev offers their own 1 year warranty on all their Canon products, so in the event that you purchase a defective Canon camera and Canon refuses to service it under warranty, DigitalRev will cover the cost of repair or replacement. I forgot where I read this but it's somewhere on the DigitalRev site and I believe it to be true.

What happened in that story above was a DigitalRev employee took one of the DRTV 5D3s and shipped it as new in order to improve his performance rating (they were out of stock and he would have had to cancel the order otherwise, negatively affecting his rating).

That was an isolated incident and DigitalRev has taken appropriate action against the employee and compensated the blogger who wrote the story. Additionally, they hired an internal auditor just to ensure that something like this would never happen again.

The whole incident showed that despite the bad employee, DigitalRev was really on top of their customer service. I would definitely buy from them!
It still doesn't change my opinion...  there are many other reputable dealers out there who have never had this kind of problem.  If DigitalRev was careless enough to allow this to happen, what else are they doing that is suspect?  Bottom line, why take a gamble on such an expensive purchase?  That's my $0.02 anyway...

9
Anyone know if DigitalRev is an authorized reseller?  Their prices seem pretty good. 
http://www.digitalrev.com/product/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii/MTAwMDQwNQ_A_A

I would not purchase from DigitalRev, especially after this fiasco... 
http://fstoppers.com/digitalrev-allegedly-selling-used-cameras-as-new-and-are-yet-to-issue-a-response

10
If the above doesn't work, open up windows/system32/diskmgmt.msc. That should recognise drives/cards not otherwise recognized by the computer.
Similarly on OS X, if you open up Disk Utility (under Applications/Utilities), it will sometimes show media that isn't properly formatted or that has corrupt partition settings.  If it does show up there (note that it may be greyed out), you can click on it and erase it.  Be sure to use MS-DOS format and MBR as the partition type as the camera won't work with a Mac-formatted card.  If the card doesn't show up in the list, there are bigger problems afoot.  I also recommend contacting Canon EOS Support as they might have additional suggestions.  Last but not least, you should be able to contact Sandisk for a free replacement.

11
Lenses / Re: Keep my 70-200 f/4 IS?
« on: April 12, 2013, 02:41:41 PM »
IQ is similar and it's much smaller and lighter - the f/4 might be nice for travel.
Seconded.  I'm one of the strange ones who purchased a 70-200 f/4L IS after getting a f/2.8L II, simply to save weight while traveling.  I do lots of hiking and every ounce counts.  The 85 f/1.2L and 135 f/2L combined weigh 2.3x more than the 70-200 f/4L IS.  I'd say if you aren't strapped for cash, hold onto both the f/4 and f/2.8 versions of the 70-200 for a while and see which one gets more use.  After a while, you'll be able to make an informed decision on why one of them should be sold or not.  Each person's needs will likely be different.

12
EOS Bodies / Re: What's the normal battery drain for a 5D3 that's off?
« on: April 05, 2013, 11:28:31 PM »
Per the measurements made by Garfield, you aren't really gaining anything by switching the camera off, rather than just letting it idle. In fact -- particularly if you have sensor cleaning set to engage each time you switch the camera on and off -- you may be discharging your battery more than you would by just letting the idle timer do its job after each 1 minute period of no activity.

I disabled auto sensor cleaning for that very reason.  When I was in Nepal for three weeks last year without ready access to power for recharging, I found that doing this and shutting the 5D3 off after shooting seemed better than letting it auto power-down.  Then again, perhaps shutting it off just prevented me from tinkering with it and needlessly engaging AF.  The CIPA standard (found at http://www.cipa.jp/english/hyoujunka/kikaku/pdf/DC-002_e.pdf) assumes one shot taken every 30 seconds, with a powerdown/powerup every 10 shots.  The 5D3 is CIPA-rated at 950 shots, so that equates to approximately eight hours of continuous use.  I was able to shoot a few hundred shots over a few days on one battery, so it doesn't seem so bad in comparison.  Interestingly, the CIPA standard doesn't prescribe a power off time, they just say it should be an amount of time which doesn't change measurement results.  So to the OP, it looks like the camera companies may measure off-mode battery drain, but only to determine at what point it isn't detrimental to the battery performance that they report.

13
EOS Bodies / Re: What's the normal battery drain for a 5D3 that's off?
« on: April 03, 2013, 11:01:51 AM »
Is it possible that AI Servo could drain them more quickly?  I do notice that often times I'm holding that back button down for a while at times, waiting for certain images... I do it with my 7d though too, it's also configured for back af-on button focusing on mine...
I would think that AF Servo would consume a lot more battery power than One Shot AF.  Garfield are you still there?  :D  To follow up to my previous posts, I did some shooting with the 5D3 this weekend for Easter and ended up with much better battery life, but I was shooting much more than usual rather than taking an occasional shot and letting the camera idle.  I noticed this effect as well with my T2i - I was once able to get 2,000 shots on one battery, but I was doing rapid fire shots nearly constantly for a rock concert.  I wish the 5D3 had a smaller time period setting for auto power off, such as 5 seconds instead of a minute.  For now I just shut off the camera after each shot when I'm shooting periodically.

14
Lenses / Re: Shooting a Rock Concert. Which Lens(es)?
« on: March 31, 2013, 03:50:34 PM »
Fast aperture primes all the way, so your 50mm f/1.4 or f/1.2 would work very well.  I find f/2.8 lenses to be way too slow for rock concerts, but if you are OK with ISO 12800 then it could work.  I generally shoot rock concerts with a 50mm f/1.4 so that I can freeze motion and keep the ISO speed down.

15
EOS Bodies / Re: What's the normal battery drain for a 5D3 that's off?
« on: March 31, 2013, 12:21:15 AM »
By the way, I found a Flickr discussion forum where a lot of people have had similar issues:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/discuss/72157628002945669/

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6