May 25, 2013, 04:16:30 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - nitelife2

Pages: [1] 2
1
Lenses / Re: lens calibration
« on: December 17, 2012, 05:53:52 PM »
If you have a 1Dx I wouldnt let Canon do the calibration. Your body allows AFMA for the wide and tele end. All values in between these ends are interpolated.

To find the best AFMA values get a license of focal pro. It is an excellent piece of software from reikan/UK. That way you can be sure that you really have the best calibration possible.

2
Lenses / Re: lens calibration
« on: November 28, 2012, 03:36:43 AM »
Hi everyone,

my question is ,

does anyone know what Canon "does" when they take both the body and lens for calibration?

Yes, I was lucky and was invited to assist in the calibration of my gear. Canon support first calibrates your camera body. They use their reference lens to calibrate the sensor plane of your body to match their lens. The calibration value is stored in the camera (You cannot see that value in the menu or anywhere else). After that they start to calibrate your lens(es) with the help of a lensalign like setup. These calibration values are stored inside the lenses. They can calibrate for the wide end and tele end and every step in between in case of zooms. Off course all AFMA values that *you* can set in the menu are reset to zero before the calibration and have to be zero afterwards.

Quote
I sent in my 24-70II since I noticed that it's not as sharp as my friend's copy (we bought them one week apart). I also mentioned that it's back focusing and that I've tried using AFMA but haven't got it right and would appreciate if that can be looked at too. To my surprise I was told that AFMA "shouldn't be used" except for "special" cases. I said, that I've been doing it all the time with all my bodies and lenses. After I sent a complaint to the person in charge of after sales/ warranty, I got a call saying that the "bad focus" is because I set AFMA and that it's stored in the ROM of the Lens..
I dont know if this was a communication/understanding error on his part as Canon really stores these calibration values in the lens. That is something the end user cant do. AFMA via the menu is different as it is a user configuration thing. Perhaps he mixed that up.

Quote
My first words "Bull $hit" I couldn't help myself. It was obvious the person talking wasn't technical. I asked, so you mean to tell me that if I set AFMA for the 24-70II on my 1DX those settings are stored on the lens.. Reply.. YES.. .. I explained why this was complete Bull$hit.!! by asking "so that means, I can't use this lens on my other camera bodies.. SILENCE..

Long story short.. I was asked to send my my 1dx which they just "reset" ALL my AFMA settings and they re-flashed the ROM on both the 1dx and 24-70II  and asked me to "retry".

I just finished testing using lensalign, (didn't feel like using focal pro). my manual testing resulted in (-4,-4).. Same as what I got with Focal Pro on the first day I got the 24-70II.
Well, Canon support is sometimes lazy and they just do nothing with your gear. They just send it back and pretend to have done something.

Quote
Any thoughts.. the CPS guy I spoke to wasn't very helpful.. He kept insisting that I should use the multicontroller/joystick to "SELECT the focus point"
Very helpful indeed...

Quote
you can imagine my frustration explaining DOF and that the little red square that's on the object tells me where I focused, and that object isn't sharp, hence SOMETHING is wrong. I asked him, do you take photos, he replied yes, I said I'm sorry but you're no photographer.. kinda mean, but I couldn't help it!!!!

Ok Rant over!!!!!!

I feel your pain. If you need help and they treat you like an idiot.

3
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D Mark III - Price Drop Details
« on: October 30, 2012, 03:20:38 PM »
Is the price drop really from Canon, or is it from retailers? I would be really curious to know whether Canon themselves is actually getting less per unit with recent drops to $3100 and $2900 and such, or whether it is simply that the initial 5D III Feaver has warn off? That all the pre-orders and early buyers who were anticipating the 5D III for years and were going to get one regardless are now done, and now retailers are trying to attract the more careful, price-wary buyers? Canon doesn't get $3500 a pop for each 5D III sold...they get something in the mid $2000 range. It is the retailers who are trying to build sales...and I assume that for all the prices down to the low of around $2700 I saw recently, they are still making a profit...as is Canon.

I got my 5dIII for 2500EUR from a small shop. If you substract the sales tax of 19% you are at 2025EUR. The shop wants to earn something as well as the distributor. So my guess is that canon is getting something in the mid 1000EUR/$ (because EUR=$ for some unknown reason) range.

4
Software & Accessories / Re: Need great Photo editing monitor
« on: October 24, 2012, 05:17:31 PM »
+1 for Dell Ultrasharps

5
The CR guy can see which country I'm in because of my IP address. But I can block or hide my IP address from any internet Proxy Server (some hackers can actually have a different IP address display e.g. to show that they're in New York when they're actually in Poland!). So your GPS idea would not work - hackers would find a way around it.

Secondly, why on earth would Canon Inc. or any other consumer electronics manufacturer wish to sell a 'dumbed- down' product for more money in Europe than a superior one (in capabilities) in the USA for less money (as prices there are already cheaper even accounting for FX rates + local taxes)?

Apple Inc. does not have a British iPhone 5 that is inferior to a Norwegian (non-EU) iPhone 5, nor would they ever consider doing that to their product lines. Can you imagine an Australian iPad 3 have lower resolution than an American iPad3. The 1DX is the 1DX no matter where you buy it in the world, and that is how it should be.

...

If a hacker bypasses a GPS (VERY DIFFICULT), then it's on the camera owner, not Canon.

...

Bypassing your GPS check is everything but difficult. You could build a device that sends (usually via serial protocol) faked GPS data to the camera (e.g. location is NY). The format of the GPS data is well known and even if Canon use a proprietary format then it should be easy to sniff the serial communiacation and decode the format.

And if that doesnt help you could patch the firmware and remove that part from the code that does the decision whether you are allowed to use extra functions.

sorry, but that doesnt work.

6
Lenses / Re: First L Lens... OH MY #^(*^!& GOD
« on: August 09, 2012, 06:22:47 PM »
is it just me, or do I see two test charts?

You do. One is his 28mm, the other his new 24L

interesting. why does the op own a test chart?

What do you mean by "own"? There are printers to make a ISO 12233 chart. Not surprising imho...

7
Lenses / Re: Special serial number codes?
« on: August 05, 2012, 01:23:11 PM »

8
Lenses / Re: Special serial number codes?
« on: August 05, 2012, 10:49:19 AM »
Exactly my thoughts. And additionaly, why would Canon not sell them for more money? A selected premium quality (LL oder XL) lenses would mean more profit IMHO...

9
Lenses / Special serial number codes?
« on: August 05, 2012, 07:30:33 AM »
Hi @all

I just found an ebay auction in Germany for a 24-105L here:
http://www.ebay.de/itm/110924892918?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

Someone who is interested in this lens asks if the second and third number of the serial number are 22, 44, 77 or 99 because Canon uses this to codify lenses of higher quality. The vendor who claims to work for some kind of magazine or the like agrees and says this is a known fact for insiders.

I never heard something about such a codification and think it is BS. Do you know more?

10
I'm looking forward to what new "features" were part of that rumor, as well.

The 7D recently got a major update...

hm, really? I cant find this major update for the 7D. You have a link?

And to the OP: Yes, there was a major update announced but nothing happened so far. Perhaps coming in 2014? Everything canon wants to release is coming with huge delays these days...

12
EOS Bodies / Re: Understanding the price increase on the 5DIII
« on: March 05, 2012, 09:49:34 PM »
From my experience I'd say Canon could sell the 5D3 for $1500 and still would make profit. But as many are willing to pay more Canon takes more... It is that easy...

13
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III High-ISO raw files
« on: March 04, 2012, 05:35:27 PM »
Yep, the colors are wrong. But I can be sure that no noise reduction has been applied. Chroma and luminance noise are very low IMHO.
 

14
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III High-ISO raw files
« on: March 04, 2012, 04:55:31 PM »
Rawtherapee can open them (at least the linux version). The ISO6400 noise of the 5D3 looks like ISO100 of my 7D. I am really impressed!

EDIT: Appended screenshot.

15
EOS Bodies / Re: Should I buy the 5DMkIII now or wait for 5DMK2
« on: February 24, 2012, 05:12:00 PM »
Another option is missing:
I dont have FF yet and want one but now it's clear that I'll be neither getting the Mk2 (ancient tech) nor the Mk3 (overpriced/feature lacking). No idea what to do now...

Pages: [1] 2