September 21, 2014, 12:16:05 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Hannes

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1
Your question is difficult to answer as I can't see why a wedding photographer would want to pick up a 7DII. If you are trying to make it as a pro you will need a body with good low light capabilities matched with good glass. A 6D will be a far better choice, better yet two of them even if this means combining them with the 24-70 2.8 I and 70-200 2.8 IS I. You are going to need high iso far more than the very sharpest photos imaginable and besides, a 24-70 I is probably sharper on FF than a 24-70 II on crop in real world shooting.

2
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D2 and EF 24 - 105 F4 L IS USM
« on: Today at 02:02:13 AM »
I've used a 24-105 on a crop body for a while and works pretty well. As long as you don't need wide angle it is good. Now if you only have a crop body it is not the lens I'd go for, it is far less suited for the smaller sensors than the bigger. Think of it as the volvo of the lens world, reliable, well built but not very exciting. If you have the lens already by all means use it but if it is only for crop consider selling it and picking up a 17-55 2.8 used for no money difference unless you really need the extra 50mm at the long end but even then you'd be better off with a 70-200.

3
Besides, Zeiss seems little more than a licensed name, these days. 

Actually the last time I saw a lens with Schneider Kreuznach on it was on my dad's Samsung P&S. Zeiss are certainly making the most of their brand name for various lenses from mobiles and upwards. One of the SK tilt shift macros would have been lovely to have but the price is somewhat prohibitive

4
EOS Bodies / Re: A New EOS Pro Body With 46mp Next Month? [CR1]
« on: September 18, 2014, 08:09:56 AM »

How many will they sell?

Enough.

Canon has always catered for the professionals at that end of the market, not the enthusiasts on a forum. The previous 1D cameras have sold for the same money, in fact more when you take inflation in to account. A higher end product will carry a better margin per unit sold. The sensor will cost roughly the same, the extra 1D internals not very much and the bigger body a bit more to make. The professionals who buy one or two cameras for $8k a pop have different expectations than the average consumer does and canon seems to be doing a better job segmenting the market than nikon.

5
Lenses / Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
« on: September 17, 2014, 06:56:34 AM »
I just wish its real

Canon lacks that mm range
11mm 12mm 13mm nope

Just EF 14mm, 15mm fisheye and 16-35mm

Canon have lenses that cover those focal lengths, mind you in vignetted fisheye but still  :)

6
Lenses / Re: Is This a Canon EF 11-24 f/4L?
« on: September 17, 2014, 06:50:56 AM »
I love the focus scale that goes 0.5, 1, infinity. The body looks a bit like the 8-15mm but who knows. Maybe it is real, let's hope so.

7
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark IV announcement on March 2015 or later
« on: September 16, 2014, 06:54:52 AM »
I don't understand why everyone is so hung up on 4k. That is not where canon's problem lies, it lies in the quality of the 1080 output right now. The codec and bitrates are lacking, that is why black magic are selling so many cameras. 4K is surely secondary to sorting out the big issues but obviously welcome

8
Lenses / Re: Official: Canon EF 24-105 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
« on: September 15, 2014, 06:40:41 PM »
I wouldn't be surprised if they phase out the 24-105 to push the more expensive 24-70. This would make an ideal kit lens for lots of photographers, especially if they get round to releasing a FF rebel camera.

My last film SLR before DSLR was a eos 300v. That thing weighs less with the kit lens than my 24-105 does by itself. It is great for portability and if FF can become more affordable economies of scale will make it cheaper for everyone.

9
Lighting / Re: Yonguo YN560-TX Transmitter Released
« on: September 14, 2014, 04:10:29 PM »
I have one, it does what it says on the tin but not more. The controls are a bit faffy when switching groups and power and the lack of AF assist seems silly. For the money though I don't think it can be beat but anything other than the godox system.

One thing it does really nicely is letting me use a rf-603 as a remote shutter and the 560-tx is the one that fires the flashes.

I'm a bit disappointed I can't add my rf-603 to groups and turn them off as I chose, they are always on. If you have a couple of YN-560III it makes a lot of sense to pick one of these up. If you are using rf-603s I wouldn't.

10
Looks like nikon raided the parts bin to try and come up with a direct 5DIII competitor. It doesn't seem that they actually tried to make it any better, just cheaper. I wonder if it'll work for them.

11
I'm a bit over 20k, nearer 30 probably. Much of this comes from going to some events where I come home with 1500 photos. Shooting any kind of action 10 fps helps immensely to get the best possible shot but it does mean lots of sifting when you get home

12
Canon General / Re: How do you cull your photo's?
« on: September 08, 2014, 05:06:28 AM »
I do large previews on my secondary screen in lightroom and delete from them as a first pass. If I can see them being bad in roughly 4x6 they go in the bin. I go through and number them one to five for the ones that are keepers. With the keepers I then usually go through and assign colours depending on what it is. For example for a climbing competition I shot I did one colour for candids, one for action sequences, one for climbing shots, one for venue shots. Any larger amount of shots, i.e. more than a hundred I will put them temporarily on one of my SSD drives to make them load so much quicker. Then when I'm done I transfer to a mechanical back up drive. 

On my slow laptop though I generally use fast stone viewer which is fast to load and only shows you the embedded jpg which is usually good enough. It is also free but not so good for deleting files but much better than windows photo viewer (which isn't very hard but still)

13
it is much easier improving equipment than skill though so that is why most are so focussed on it.

14
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Features seen in the past and absent today
« on: September 03, 2014, 07:11:01 AM »
What about the "the wave" shutter.  using the proximity sensor on the t2i to trigger the shutter

how about a proximity sensor at all :0 

internal vf shutter to block light from the optical view finder

Sensor zoom in movie mode - jumping from full frame to just 1920x1080 pixels

There are tons of features magic lantern that Canon should bake into its firmware

The vf shutter Is alive and kicking but only on 1 series bodies

15
Glass has gotten better, film no longer exits.

Speak for yourself, I ran a roll of Kodak through my Pentax MX last week :) It is excellent DSLR detox

Yes...but...what was the shadow noise of the film like, and could it compare to Exmor?  ;D

It was amazing, I pushed the shadows a full five stops and no banding what so ever was visible! I'm so switching to film!





Yes, the colours come out like that

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16