November 27, 2014, 12:39:20 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - fox40phil

Pages: [1] 2 3
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Announces the Cinema EOS C100 Mark II
« on: October 22, 2014, 03:14:10 PM »
oh my... still 60fps at 1080p... I think I'm not the only one who means that the Canon line-up stagnates...
And Canon doesn't notice this, the competition and what the people want.  :-X

Canon General / Re: More Canon Lens Mentions [CR2]
« on: October 10, 2014, 11:17:01 AM »
I'm looking for Sigma to outbid that S___... with a nice price.  >:(

Whats wrong with Canon?!

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Looking Into a New Mount System
« on: September 22, 2014, 07:30:46 AM »
A mirroless fullframe camera would be so nice! please with a EF adapter with AF.

Make the production costs down and rise the prices up... yeah nice...  :-\  :-X

A full frame compact cam from Canon would be nice.. with some nice pancake lenses and EF bayonet...

B&h mail says it is weather sealed with an optional protection filter.
First time seeing that! Any other lens have that kind of sealing?

thx for the info! :)

Hm seems that the 16-35 doesn't has weather sealing?  :-\

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Body $2559
« on: April 24, 2014, 05:57:34 PM »
"May not ship to Germany" hm this sucks  :-\

I say Sigmas AF in the new lenses is pretty good for the money....
If I can't trust it, it's worthless.
That was how I felt with the erratic and occasionally brilliant old model Sigma 50mm f/1.4.
My two copies got used for some personal work, endless testing but simply couldn't be trusted for client work. Therefore ultimately worthless.

I truly hope Sigma finds an AF fix for the new lenses deliverable via firmware. The optics are clearly awesome, but without dependable AF they're a commercial no-go.


I can totaly sign this!

the AF is the main thing and it need to work to 85-95% perfect...(for lens > 800€/1000$) I think..

Lenses / Re: Review: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens
« on: April 22, 2014, 01:13:48 PM »
The AF problems are really bad =(.... I hate AF inconsistency at events... I own the old 50mm of Sigma, and sometimes it or my camera (5DII) produced faulty AF photos.

I think the info should be posted, there's people who save and spend their money thinking they will be getting a great quality item. Canon should fix the problem on their dime, not ours

yes!! You should post this stuff ASAP!! For us... the customers!

Canon General / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Image
« on: February 07, 2014, 04:55:59 PM »
no flash? and no flash + EVF?  :-\ come on... that's sad!  :-X

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Body $2549
« on: February 01, 2014, 12:04:40 PM »
now "US $3,399.00" ? hm

The cheapest in Germany is  2.475,00 €   ::)

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II in Q2? [CR1]
« on: January 31, 2014, 09:14:37 AM »
why they need those big events to test prototypes?!... each local sport or some better ranked sport-league will be able for testing new hardware stuff..?!   :-\

Q3/Q4... come on..

EOS Bodies / Re: The Next DSLR Will Be Entry Level [CR3]
« on: January 17, 2014, 07:39:40 AM »
booring news  :(  :-X ...

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50 f/1.4 Art Lens Should be Amazing
« on: January 15, 2014, 11:11:33 AM »
Release date hmm?

Start to save my money now^^...

Pages: [1] 2 3