December 20, 2014, 11:33:49 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - whothafunk

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
to be honest, who the fcuk cares anymore. definitely not people, who shot sports, for which 7D2 is intended for.

i'm extremely happy with my 7D2 and i use it 80% for indoor sports, where crop doesn't shine due to high ISO - over 4000 up to 10.000, but it's still good, but speed and AF are just sick.

2
"OH WOE IS ME, some people will receive the 7D2 a few days earlier than me, OH MY GAWD. I will not be able to brag sooner than them and my cats will not have new pictures, have mercy!!"

really people? really? in Slovenia, we won't see the darn thing before mid of December.

3
EOS Bodies / Re: DPR Adds Studio Samples for EOS 7D Mark II
« on: October 29, 2014, 06:26:44 AM »
That's respectable from a 'look how close APS-C can get to FF these days!' perspective.
that respect was already earned by 70D 14 months ago.

4
juvenile video. A6000 and 11fps, ok. but doesn't have a state of the art AF to keep track of fast, erratic moving subjects like D4s and 1Dx have. not weather sealed, etc. and there are so many more reasons this video is just.. meh. especially the social media part and stealing thunder.. that part was just plain funny.

but as long as a6000 is enough for his needs, thats fine.

5
EOS Bodies / Re: DPR Adds Studio Samples for EOS 7D Mark II
« on: October 28, 2014, 12:34:41 PM »
APS-C is never as sharp as FF, even at ISO100, no way you can expect they would be on equal terms at 800-3200, where noise is a lot more visible and apparent on APS-C than on FF. More noise, less sharpness and less contrast.

6
EOS Bodies / Re: DPR Adds Studio Samples for EOS 7D Mark II
« on: October 27, 2014, 07:56:17 AM »
In other words.. JPEG just about the same as 70D from 100-6400, maybe 1/3 of an improvement, depends where on the picture you look. I was hoping they would improve noise reduction algorytm for JPEG.

7
images look strong at that High ISO because they were all shot in practically good light conditions. Same ISO in poorly lit gyms shooting fast moving subjects like f.e. basketball/handball sprinters.. that's another story.

and as it has been written in the comment section in that video.. it's more of a commercial to the 7D2 than a review.

8
extremely sloppy comparison.

edit: nevermind, my fault in my extremely sloppy reading

9
EOS Bodies / Re: 7d mark II as reviewed by Artie Morris
« on: October 22, 2014, 06:20:47 AM »
Is it just me or his Blog is a mess!? I like the info, but I have rarely seen a blog that is so uncomfortable to read...
I thought I was the only one. Agree, his blog is a freaking riot.

10
Reviews / Re: Gizmodo reviews the Canon 7D Mark II
« on: October 21, 2014, 09:25:16 AM »
already 2 errors in the review.. 22MP and Dual Digic6+ (PLUS). No, it's a 20.2MP and it has Dual Digic6. Let's read onward..

12
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 80D????
« on: October 02, 2014, 02:19:46 AM »
2016 would be the year of 80D, if we look at the previous xxD release cycles.
Hopefully the Rebels start getting more than 9 AF points around that time.
yes, 11 point AF from the 6D!

13
EOS Bodies / Re: No EOS-1D X Replacement in 2014 [CR2]
« on: September 29, 2014, 09:35:06 AM »
But when?

I'm mostly curious about the 5D replacement.  Spring or not?
Not spring. Canon has to milk buyers with the 7D2 for a year or so. If they released 5D4 with 7D2's AF feature in spring (5 months after 7D2 got released (not introduced)), who would buy the 7D2, if the 5D4 offers same or even tweaked AF with slightly lower frame, but better IQ?

I find it strange they haven't introduced a new rebel yet. It's been 18 months now.

14
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II: More High ISO Samples
« on: September 28, 2014, 03:30:56 AM »
until i see indoor action (sport) images in poorly lit gymnasiums, i will not call 7DII to be an improvement in High ISO department over the 70D. daily high ISO shots don't show nothing, neither do well lit structures at night.

15
EOS Bodies / Re: More Talk of an October Announcement of a DSLR [CR1]
« on: September 27, 2014, 02:47:59 AM »
and not think that it has something to do, at least partly, with differences in camera technology (particularly at the high end.) ..... It's just difficult to think the market share shift is entirely unrelated to the differences in sensor technology.
The reason why Nikon's sales went up compared to Canon (in the High end part) is because they release their s.h.i.t. every 6 months (with incremental improvements - D600/D610, D800e/D810, D4/D4s), and people jump for the new stuff.

If Canon released a new 1D and a new 5D body in, let's say 8 months time difference, Nikon would probably lose sales on all ends except for D810.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10