October 21, 2014, 04:44:28 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dufflover

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Canon EF 2.0X TC With Diffractive Optics Element
« on: October 19, 2014, 07:41:00 PM »
True that does make sense. Given how it's magnifying that smaller section of the frame into a 35mm sensor area over that relatively short distance a DO design would help.
Then again in most cases the lens it gets bolted onto seems to be bigger the bottleneck anyway.

2
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 6D Mark II to Move Upmarket? [CR1]
« on: October 19, 2014, 07:38:34 PM »
You can complain all you want about the 6D and its features, but unless you can produce better numbers, don't think for a minute that it hasn't been a great success for Canon.

Well the rumour is that it's Canon themselves saying this about the sales not the CR complainers. We just offer up some simple explanations lol

3
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 6D Mark II to Move Upmarket? [CR1]
« on: October 15, 2014, 10:03:41 PM »
I think people need to take their brand-glasses off if they can't see how the 6D was intentionally crippled.

4
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 6D Mark II to Move Upmarket? [CR1]
« on: October 15, 2014, 08:13:03 AM »
Canon did exactly that though. They crippled as much as possible whilst still getting sales. It shoots slower than a Rebel FFS. Not sure where they get the 7D2 IQ is being pitched as similar either. A lot of people still reckon 6D smashes the 70D (I'd say about 1 to 1.5 stops in my usage) and 70D ~= 7D2 so ... it's not suddenly unappealing on the IQ front.

I'll echo the prev poster though; who is really saying the 6D's sales are crap? I mean you get people defending the fact it's non-cross AF and FPS are slower than a Rebel! Can't be doing too badly if people do that lol

5
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 6D Mark II to Move Upmarket? [CR1]
« on: October 14, 2014, 06:11:21 PM »
I may be late to this discussion, but I think what most users including myself have issues with the 6D is that as a consumer you feel Canon is NOT giving you "great value" for your money when they take the AF system back to one center cross-type, while Nikon doesn't seem to cripple their bodies in the same way.  It was biggest the complaint about the 5D Mark II, and Canon addressed it well with the Mark III, only to revert back to it with the 6D.  My memory is not that short term.
Also late to the topic but this echoes my thoughts too.
Canon not happy with 6D sales? More like their deliberate gimping of the 6D has come back to bite them (FWIW the 6Ds seem to still be quite highly recommended, including excuses of "no body needs more than 3fps :P).

So all I can really say is the same thing as before. If they made them all cross-type at say 5fps, it probably would've sold a lot more without costing 5D3 sales.

6
Canon General / Re: More Canon Lens Mentions [CR2]
« on: October 11, 2014, 04:12:52 AM »
In the end Canon (like anyone else) will charge what they think people will pay and sadly I think it will still sell "enough" at that price. It'll be a good lens (anything has to be at that price) and I think the usual reasons of demand, rich folks and system locking will make enough people shell out for one.

7
I didn't even know there were new Sigma TCs LOL
I have the non-Sport version. I wonder if the new TCs would work on that and other older lenses then. I agree something is not quite right when you get these issues.

(not that I think I'll have this situation as I already own a set of Canon/Sigma TCs for it like most who own this lens)

8
EOS Bodies / Re: Multilayer Sensors are Coming From Canon [CR2]
« on: October 08, 2014, 10:20:34 PM »
A CR2 involving new, and actually "real" new sensor tech. Finally, bring it on!

9
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II: More High ISO Samples
« on: September 29, 2014, 02:50:27 AM »
I own a 70D as well and they look pretty much the same to me ...

10
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II: More High ISO Samples
« on: September 28, 2014, 12:35:37 AM »
The initial reception to this camera based on specs was pretty tepid, which I didn’t understand.

Dynamic range...  :P
I would've guessed because not everyone is deliberately playing dumb and pretending the 70D didn't exist for a while and the IQ is equivalent to that.

11
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Says Higher Resolution Sensors Are Coming Soon
« on: September 25, 2014, 05:54:16 AM »
It's a Canon rep, ofcourse they won't say anything officially negative or bad about their own company.
Corporate common sense (unfortunately) so all just marketing spiel.

12
EOS Bodies / Re: Official: Canon EOS 7D Mark II
« on: September 23, 2014, 07:05:54 AM »
The new / upgraded sensor 20.2Mp from 70D to 7DMii is much cleaner...
umm wut?

Quote
I'm doubt when will the new / upgrade sensor will be replace into 80D or 90D???
oh please god don't drag out this sensor for another 5 years (as much as I like some of the practical features like DPAF)

13
EOS Bodies / Re: Sample Images From the EOS 7D Mark II
« on: September 21, 2014, 08:03:32 AM »
I know I'm a few pages late to the party :P, but yes this CR topic is so misleading.
Many people didn't bother with the 70D because the IQ difference was minimal. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the exact same people are now singing the praises of the almost identical 7DII lol

(as usual for transparency let me repeat I quite like my 70D)

14

Which makes you wonder how much money is riding on Chuck's comments.

And if there's money riding on it then Canon must feel at risk due to something ... wonder if Nikon/Sony have briefed various customers/partners on an upcoming lens that will compare favorably to the existing one?

Probably just since there was no mention of one at Photokina, Canon needs to keep the replacement mill turning as usual to keep people keen on waiting lol

(P.S. yes I'm a P-P fan too)

15
EOS Bodies / Re: A New EOS Pro Body With 46mp Next Month? [CR1]
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:12:17 AM »
If it is meant to be a 1-series style D800, not sure it's a good sign on the potential DR front if going off that earlier post it has the same pixel density as an 18MP APS-C sensor. I don't think I need to point out what's not good on seeing that number again LOL

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10