November 24, 2014, 05:02:59 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - plam_1980

Pages: [1] 2
1
Lenses / Re: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II Sample Images
« on: November 14, 2014, 02:33:56 AM »
Oh, with that resolution we can see that it is good for web purposes  8)
There are full res images too. Look under the image, near its name there is a link: "( Click here to view larger image )". Enjoy! :)

OK, thanks, sorry but my Chinese let me down this time :)

2
Lenses / Re: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II Sample Images
« on: November 13, 2014, 03:45:08 AM »
Oh, with that resolution we can see that it is good for web purposes  8)

3
Don't forget to take into account that most U.S. workers make less per hour than folks in other countries. Minimum wage in the U.S. is only $7.25 per hour.

Edit: Just did a quick Google search and see that "Last week, the lower house of Parliament in Germany voted to set a nationwide minimum wage of 8.50 euros an hour, about $11.60 (USD), effective in 2015. The upper house is expected to approve the measure this week."
That's a 60% increase over the minimum wage in the U.S.  Not that everyone makes minimum wage of course.
First:
A product has a value (production+logistics+r&d+ etc.) that is (edit:) almost independent to the market you sell it.
Sales strategy is something different.
Second:
Please also goole up not only the gross but also the net income after all taxes, social insurance and also the costs for rent, living, etc.
(I'm not willing to do so. It's your argumentation.)

So your comparison isn't one. I can find no argument.

+1, and furthermore, in Bulgaria, which is also in the European Union, the minimum wage is about USD 215 per month, the average one is about USD 400 per month. I don't see the prices being 10 times cheaper than US, on the contrary, they are the same as in all Europe

Best

4
EOS Bodies / Re: 46MP body rumor is hoax?
« on: November 04, 2014, 10:15:55 AM »
I don't know if this was already posted somewhere in the thread for the 46MP body, but obviously the "rumour" on Fred Miranda's blog about this body, which started the hype was either crazy or a hoax:

http://photographicwanderings.com/2014/10/02/news-46mp-megapixel-canon-1dsx-dslr-about-to-be-announced-or-the-anatomy-of-a-rumor/
*lol*
Thanks for sharing.

+1  Brought a smile to my face, that's worthy of thanks.  :)

Yes, on mine as well :) Next time we better ask George W. Bush directly, if he has a report for a forthcoming Canon product :) You can't blame the guy actually, he said that this is his prediction and everyone thought that this is some elaborate way to say "inside information", because this is what everyone wished for :) Of course the fact that Fred Miranda himself said that "he trusts this guy" helped a lot. Which in itslelf raises a lot of questions regarding ethics etc.

P.S. when I watch that photo, I can't help but think of Twin Peaks - "The owls are not what they seem"  ;D

5
EOS Bodies / 46MP body rumor is hoax?
« on: November 04, 2014, 04:56:19 AM »
I don't know if this was already posted somewhere in the thread for the 46MP body, but obviously the "rumour" on Fred Miranda's blog about this body, which started the hype was either crazy or a hoax:

http://photographicwanderings.com/2014/10/02/news-46mp-megapixel-canon-1dsx-dslr-about-to-be-announced-or-the-anatomy-of-a-rumor/

6
EOS Bodies / Re: Modular DSLR Coming from Canon? [CR2]
« on: October 30, 2014, 03:46:32 AM »
Jeez, is THIS really what we Canon customers have been requesting from Canon?   :'(

Becase Canon's the hero the world deserves, but not the one it needs right now... Oops, that was Batman  ;D

7
Canon General / Re: seeimpossible.usa.canon.com?
« on: October 07, 2014, 04:00:54 AM »
< 10 mins - will the website crash with our optimism?

It was explained several times in the thread, that obviously the timer is not adjusted for different time zones, but just New York

8
Canon General / Re: seeimpossible.usa.canon.com?
« on: October 07, 2014, 03:34:35 AM »
Hi,
   
Quote
Because we don’t see what you see.
     AT CANON, WE SEE IMPOSSIBLE.
     So to us, it's Impossible to See... No wonder we all cannot see the "whatever" you want us to see... ha ha ha  :P

    Have a nice day.

PS: GMT now: 7:23am.

hahaha, made my day  ;D

9
Canon General / Re: seeimpossible.usa.canon.com?
« on: October 07, 2014, 02:17:36 AM »
Can someone please calculate at what time will the timer go off according to EST time, so we can adjust :)

Edit: OK, AUGS answered while I was writing, thanks

10
EOS Bodies / Re: A New EOS Pro Body With 46mp Next Month? [CR1]
« on: September 19, 2014, 04:58:08 AM »
I don't know if someone already posted this, but according to this site:
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr4-no-other-new-camera-from-sony-at-photokina-sr5-new-generation-sensor-and-cameras-release-in-january/

"(SR5) Sony is preparing a BIG event in January! They will release a complete new generation of cameras with a new generation sensor. Cameras have those two features:
1) Very high resolution and dynamic range. One of them is a 46 megapixel FF sensor.
2) Very fast AF speed

I know it’s strange they did not announce those at Photokina. But that it is. I Thank All trusted sources for the info they shared the last couple of weeks. I hope you sources can help me to feed SAR readers with some reliable rumor about the next generation cameras coming in January!

-

A couple of notes: January announcement is 100% correct as it really got confirmed by highly trusted sources. So trust me on this"

I really hope Canon will not lag behind and this new EOS body becomes a fact

11
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Specifications Confirmed
« on: September 11, 2014, 11:22:03 AM »
To all of you who say, that these specs are appropriate for a 2014 camera and not for 2012, bear in mind that with this replacement cycle, the next 7D will be available in 2019. What would you think of those specs even in half of that term?
You claim that these specs are the best package compared to the competition, but the competition will be releasing their competing bodies in the near future, not in 5 years. This camera sounds boring

12
Photography Technique / Re: Benefits of IS in fast shutter speeds
« on: September 10, 2014, 09:56:15 AM »
Thanks everyone for the answers, that is what I needed to know

Best

13
Photography Technique / Re: Benefits of IS in fast shutter speeds
« on: September 10, 2014, 07:14:47 AM »
IS will not benefit fast action. It may actually blur your images by trying to stabilise it, so turn it off. IS is useful for camera shake, if your shooting fast action at high SP then its no benefit, but is useful when panning or when the light gets low. IS is useful for stabilising the viewfinder tho, so you can track subjects easier at large focal lengths.

IS does nothing with moving subjects its primarily objective is to reduce camera shake. Mode 2 on some lenses aids panning.

Thanks for the reply. I know its objective is to reduce camera shake, my question is if I shoot hand-held, does camera shake have significant effect on the photos in high shutter speed, so that IS will be of use, or the high shutter speed itself eliminates enough the hand shake

Cheers,

14
Photography Technique / Benefits of IS in fast shutter speeds
« on: September 10, 2014, 04:57:17 AM »
Hi there,

I have a 5D Mark III and occasionally I shoot sport events (indoor as well as outdoor) with it. I shoot fast-action sports, so usually use high shutter speed to be able to freeze the action. So I was wondering if I have to buy new lens, is IS something that I will benefit from, or at shutter speeds which are higher than the focal lenght there is no significant advantage of IS?

Thanks  :)

15
Photography Technique / Re: Getting photos home from overseas
« on: September 02, 2014, 07:56:55 AM »
My question to all of you who say that shoot 16-24GB per day: do you even have the time and nerves to go through all those photos more than once when you go back home?

Pages: [1] 2