September 03, 2014, 12:45:24 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - eml58

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 96
1
Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: September 02, 2014, 02:02:50 AM »
Eml,
I have visited Japan a few time, and it is a great place.  I talked to my wife just yesterday about going back to visit again.
I would like to ask you for permission to use your Autumn Kyoto photo as a subject for my wife to paint in watercolor.
Thanks.
-r

Your most welcome glad you like it, PM me with an email address, happy to send you a larger version.

2
Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: September 01, 2014, 07:41:08 PM »
Autumn in Japan 2012 Kyoto

This picture looks like a Monet. Beautiful colors. Well done Edward.

Thanks Click, wish it was worth as much as a Monet  :)

3
Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: September 01, 2014, 07:12:49 PM »
elm,
Very breath taking abstract of Kyoto!
-r

Appreciated, not hard to end up with reasonable images in Japan, the whole Country & it's People are Photogenic.

4
Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: September 01, 2014, 07:11:16 PM »
Bridge in a Forest

5
Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: September 01, 2014, 06:43:22 PM »
Autumn in Japan 2012 Kyoto

6
Software & Accessories / Re: Optimizing your monitor for print production...
« on: September 01, 2014, 06:14:51 PM »
jd, a good place to start might be this Book, I've found it exceptionally handy & definitely worth the $30 investment, it's certainly helped me improve my Printing & Monitor set up etc.

http://www.amazon.com/Fine-Art-Printing-Photographers-Exhibition/dp/1937538249/ref=dp_ob_image_bk

On my own Monitor set up I use the X Right i1 Pro, again, I find it worth the investment, currently I use it to set up my Apple 30" Cinema Display & my Sharp K321 4K Monitor.

7
EOS Bodies / Re: Is Canon now two generations behind Nikon?
« on: September 01, 2014, 05:56:11 PM »
Marc Adamus (although, I think he may have moved to a D800 as well...and his work tends to be a bit overly saturated for my tastes.)

jrista check this, your half on the money.

http://fstopgear.com/staffpro/marc-adamus
Also agree this guys work is amazing.

Finally found a Post on this thread I felt I could respond to, Thanks.


8
Finally, let's for once all be honest about something. There isn't a nickel's worth of difference between Nikon and Canon anyway.

Completely agree, perhaps a large part of the issue re comments on the worth/worthlessness of Nikon/Canon/Sony/Phase One etc etc on these forums, and this one in particular, is envy, boredom, vicious mindset, the list is long.

Enjoy what you have while you can, stop looking over the fence.

9
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: August 27, 2014, 07:21:11 PM »
Spider Monkey - shot earlier today.

EF400+1.4x III, f4, ISO250, 1/1000.

Thought I was looking into a Mirror at first, Love the shot, sort of Planet of the Apes look, mean & ready to Kick Butte.

10
Lenses / Re: 200 f/2.0 vs 70-200 f/2.8 II
« on: August 27, 2014, 06:05:57 AM »
I sometimes also shoot landscapes or animals.

Love the Chimp shot, well done.

11
Lenses / Re: 400 f/2.8L II IS: Took the plunge...
« on: August 27, 2014, 06:04:08 AM »
Bdunbar you are going to simply Love that Lens, I had both the Mk 1 then the Mk II, both superb lenses, the biggest advantage with the MK II is the weight loss over the MK I.

I did sell my 400MK II and at times I've regretted it, that f/2.8 is just amazingly useful, I now use the 200-400f/4 and although it suits my wildlife well, I've compensate for the loss of the 400f/2.8 II by always having the 300f/2.8 II with me & hope I'm close enough to use it when needed in low light.

Great Lens, reasonably sure you'll have no regrets, have fun look forward to seeing some Images.

12
Lenses / Re: 200 f/2.0 vs 70-200 f/2.8 II
« on: August 27, 2014, 05:56:56 AM »
Think about it this way.  You'd be paying thousands more in order to take pictures where less and less stuff is in focus.  Yes, I know that it is a fantastically sharp lens , but let's not kid ourselves about to the real reason most people lust after the lens.  Super thin DOF/background separation.

Umm, what ?????

Yes, that's why I bought my Canon 200f/2, my Zeiss Otus 55 f/1.4, my Canon 135f/2, my Zeiss 135 f/2, the stupidly thin DOF, what else ???? Well sharpness included of course, all these Lenses have that in spades.

The 200f/2 is I think just about affordable pain, can you or can't you, if you can, that's the end of the debate, once you have it I can pretty well Guarantee you will never get rid of it, well, at least until Canon release the 200f/2 V II.

13
It may just be about budget, how much pain are you prepared to endure for the "right" set up, and the "right set up" is somewhat loaded.

If you can afford the 200-400f/4, it's an amazing Lens, I haven't a single regret purchasing mine.

if you can afford it, hook it up to a 1Dx or a 5DMK III, talk to your Wife/Bank Manager if necessary.

Another option might be, 1DMK IV (I have kept mine, love the 1.3 crop), set it to your 70-200f/2.8 & have a 1.4x MK III Extender for the longer shots, yes it's a bit of messing about setting that 1.4x, but a 1DMK IV 2nd hand will be a reasonably cost effective method of getting you reach & quality.

The 70-200 f/2.8 II works very well with the 1DMK IV and the 1.4x Extender, not too badly with the 2x Extender, not great, but not bad, biggest issue with the extenders is loosing the f stop, if you can live with that, your in clover.

14
Lenses / Re: 200 f/2.0 vs 70-200 f/2.8 II
« on: August 25, 2014, 10:47:47 PM »
300 f/2.8L IS II is awesome.  Sharpest lens in Canon's line-up and killer bokeh.

Any extender on the 200mm f/2L IS and it falls to pieces.

Well I can agree with the first point, the 300f/2.8 II is an amazingly sharp Lens & it does work well with the 1.4x III Extender, the 2x III Extender not as well, but that's to be expected.

I can't see the 2nd point though, the 200f/2 works just as well with the 1.4x III Extender as the 300 in my experience, perhaps not as well as the 300 with the 2x III Extender.

I've had the 200f/2 for several Years now & used the Lens extensively, my current 300f/2.8 is the Version II, bought after selling the Version 1, both these Lenses are sharp, the V II maybe, maybe a tad sharper, but the benefits here at least to me have been mostly in the weight distribution and the weight loss.

15
Lenses / Re: 200 f/2.0 vs 70-200 f/2.8 II
« on: August 25, 2014, 07:27:06 PM »
Again, completely agree with Viggo's comments, I own & use the 85f/1.2, 135f/2, 70-200f/2.8, all excellent lenses, but the 200f/2 is just head & shoulders apart, the sharpness, the Bokeh & the colour rendition are just about perfect. The 70-200f/2.8 II @ 200 ?? lovely, but just not as good as the 200f/2.

If you can get past the price you will not likely regret owning this lens.

The attached is an example of what the lens can do, Japan in Autumn 1Dx 200f/2 @ f/2

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 96