March 04, 2015, 11:27:56 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dswtan

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
EOS Bodies / Re: Smartphones Already Won -- Laforet
« on: February 26, 2015, 10:47:34 PM »
People are posting graphs and arguing statistics here, as usual, instead of looking at photos.

Topically, this was just posted today:
http://blog.flickr.net/en/2015/02/26/top-25-mobile-photos-flickr-2014/

Enjoy! I know I did. :-)

FWIW, I use all my cameras as often as I have them available -- phones, compacts, MILCs, DSLRs -- hell, I even used my iPad the other morning for a quick shot! (Felt ridiculous, as it should, but I needed it RIGHT THEN!)

2
Photography Technique / Re: What is your keeper rate?
« on: February 16, 2015, 11:36:15 AM »
+1 privatebydesign, mb66energy, Zv - and possibly others!

Since I pretty much keep everything (disk space is cheap, though backups can be painful), that definition of "keeper rate" is not very useful? Then there is "technically ok" but could still be flawed in many other ways.

My best go on 500px, with some extras at Flickr. I have 140 photos at the former, from 10s of thousands of original shots still on disk. What's the "keeper" here?

3
PowerShot / Re: Official: Canon PowerShot G3 X Coming Some Day
« on: February 10, 2015, 11:26:10 AM »
Amazed this is not getting more buzz! Sounds fantastic for my business travel needs, replacing my longstanding ~3-yr G-series upgrades and occasional superzoom usage. Probably better for me than the M3! Hope the lack of discussion here is not indicative of a potential meh reaction from the market... :-/

4
EOS-M / Re: Would you sacrifice smaller LCD screen for built in viewfinder?
« on: February 08, 2015, 01:31:24 AM »
No. I have no need for a built-in viewfinder on a compact camera and am glad Canon agrees for the M. I do not understand why people want these little peep-holes on such cameras. Complete waste of space for me -- on compacts. Add-on solution for those that want them suits me just fine.

5
EOS-M / Re: First Images of the Canon EOS M3
« on: February 04, 2015, 02:47:19 AM »
Very encouraged by the M3 photos so far - no use for an EVF for me, and love all the little improvements I'm seeing. Price likely steep, so I'm unlikely to be an early adopter, but Canon occasionally surprises us. Fingers crossed for that and a good sensor! My usage is a lightweight companion and backup to my main 5D3.

6
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D MkII will not power up
« on: January 06, 2015, 04:42:04 PM »
Obviously you've tried more than one charged main battery... Try also the hidden clock battery, which will be getting old now: https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Canon+Eos+5d+Mark+II+Date+and+time+battery+Replacement/5012

7
Pricewatch Deals / Deal: X-Rite MSCCPP ColorChecker Passport
« on: December 11, 2014, 03:14:48 AM »
This time-limited Amazon Gold Box deal may be of interest today. I have no affiliation, etc. For deal link, check upcoming deals in your Gold Box at amazon.com. You should price compare with your other favorite retailers to be sure it is good.

Upcoming Deal
X-Rite MSCCPP ColorChecker Passport
Starts at 7:50 AM [Pacific]

Standard link is
 
AFFILIATE LINK REMOVED MY MOD

8
Photography Technique / Re: Share 3x your own advice to yourself!
« on: December 06, 2014, 02:37:35 PM »
+1 great thread, thanks everyone too. The only new one I can add (3 times!) is something that distant.star's 54-yr old photo highlights immediately from the subsequent posts -- like them, I see great merit in the shot too.

The same thing happens in pretty much all my shots -- what others see, and like (or dislike), is seldom what I as the photographer sees. From judging and reviewing photos in various contexts over the years, I have learned this is common.

Maybe the best photographers are different, and either innately or come to learn how others will perceive their shots, and tune their efforts accordingly. For me, I shoot for myself, and it's potluck what others take from it. Such is the indulgence of the amateur, and why I would never make it for a millisecond as a pro. (Respect to all that do!)

I'm reminded of a quote my Scottish mother used to like:
"O wad some Pow'r the giftie gie us, To see oursels as ithers see us!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_a_Louse

The photographer's version, and my contribution here, would be:
And would some Power the small gift give us, To see our shots as others see them!

3x :o

9
Technical Support / Re: QUESTION ABOUT RECHARGABLE AA BATTERIES.
« on: December 06, 2014, 12:53:26 PM »
Love Eneloops! Night and day difference to traditional NiMHs. In the US, Costco is a good source, especially when occasionally on offer. You tend to end up with a myriad chargers that way though, since they are always bundled (like Surapon's Amazon link shows.)

10
While getting dated (2009), my friend's experiences should still be quite useful to you and others planning this trip:

http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/dht/files/neil-enns-antartica.pdf

http://forums.thoughtsmedia.com/f303/neil-enns-antarctic-trip-94640.html

Follow-ups and more at his blog: http://www.danecreek.com/blog/

One result: http://www.blurb.com/b/1166997-antarctica

11
My 70-300L has not come out of the cupboard for a very long time now. I really should (and will eventually) sell it.

Strange. The 70-300L is my main default lens on the 5D3 -- I look forward to the new 100-400 and appreciate the potential similarities! Different strokes. :-)

12
Building PCs from scratch? I leave that to the real enthusiasts or people with time on their hands. If you go to Cyberpower or IBuyPower in the US (at least), you pay very little for the build and yet get a reasonably nice, fairly tested, and very flexible configuration of components that are ready to go and much better value than a mainstream brand PC.

Selective component upgrading (SSD, extra HDs, more memory, better graphics, etc.) is worth it every 12-24 months for many people, as long as the technology is improving -- and it mostly does, in various ways. But OS upgrades are seldom worth the trouble, so I'm sympathetic to sticking with an older OS as long as you don't fall too far behind -- in which case, it's time to move on to newer hardware, which seems to be the case here with Harv actually.

But I am fortunate to just get a new machine every couple of years and keep the older one as a backup, as some others have suggested here. I watch for the significant (not the minor) CPU generational upgrades. For the last couple of machines, I went with the above pre-built options (both companies).

13
Do NOT use the 24L II for astro. It is a complete waste of time. You will be frustrated, like others before you.

It has the most appalling coma (distorted stars in corners). This only shows up in astro. See: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/50949062 - there has been similar discussion in this Forum too, but that thread was the best I found.

I do not know how the 2.8 performs in this regard, but typically Canon seems to not have low coma in their priorities. I do have the 24L II and I have spoiled astro shots thanks to the coma - I made the same stick-with-Canon mistake as you.

I now have a set of the Koreans dedicated for astro work. The Korean lenses are exceptional for astro. That they are so inexpensive is an amazing bonus. Manual focus is all you want at night. Live view to focus precisely. They are even sharp at full aperture.

Buy your 2.8 if you need AF in daylight, this may be reasonable for your daytime purposes. But use the rest of your 24L savings and get yourself one of the Korean brands (Samyang/Bower/Rokinon) for night use. Seriously, they are just fantastic at night -- plus, it's at night. No one can see the brand you are using and we won't tell on you. :-)

14
Technical Support / Re: Pink/purple streak in pics when using live view
« on: September 23, 2014, 10:15:31 AM »
I have this, but my pattern is a more defined flare.

Mine's on a 5D2, also full spectrum (clear sensor filter) converted by Life Pixel. They may know more about this, since they've probably had comments on it over the years unless it's extremely rare (just you and I!). But I've not got around to reaching out to them, and I'm not at the point of complaining about it, since the simple workaround is just not to use Live View during astrophotography except for focusing.

You can see my posts on it from just a couple of weeks ago, with photos, here:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54257998
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Infrared_Photography/conversations/topics/22481

Mine -- complete dark, same with no lens attached, only source of light must be within body -- 30s at 1600 ISO:

15
EOS Bodies / Re: More Images of the Canon EOS 7D Mark II
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:57:31 PM »
I'm really happy to see this and the 5D3 similarities!

As others have said, +1 as my new wildlife cam to complement my 5D3 all-rounder. Wide stays on the latter now, and telephoto on 7D2. Perfect. Assuming no pricing insanity, which seems unlikely in the current market and recent tends.

And the if new battery may be back-compatible to use my existing LP-E6s, that is fantastic!

My original 7D will be for sale. Thank you old friend, but we're done now. Poor thing has not been turned on for a year or more. Welcome, 7D2! :D

Pages: [1] 2 3 4