June 18, 2013, 08:00:25 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - yogi

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
1
Site Information / Re: CR wobbly
« on: June 17, 2013, 09:05:43 PM »
Touch Wood, all seems to be working fine today, Thanks CR, I imagine someone set a Trap for those Pesky Code Screwing Up Squirrels.

Been on CR for an Hour, none of the issues re occurring at this Point either on the Blog or the Forum.

Same here. (forum only). After being on the forum for a number of hours. Was interrupted once by some overgrown rats with bushy tails, but otherwise no problems.

2
Site Information / Re: banning people for nothing at canon rumors
« on: June 17, 2013, 07:39:38 PM »
This thread makes me think of this what the duck cartoon strip:


WTD1403 by itsmeitisss, on Flickr


Very funny. Wasnt aware of that comic strip. In my case, not "win an argument", just spending much time on CR, when i have other things i should be doing. Oh, who cares if the lawn is not mowed (the neighborhood ass ociation). :'(

3
C'mon!  NOBODY is going to chime in with "Sell the body and take the golden opportunity to switch to a Nikon system"????  The trolls must be out enjoying the nice weather or something.

Well, it has happened. Though not from a troll, i guess?. :-\

Sell the 5D2, especially if it's one of the banding-prone early models.
buy a refurb D800 and a new Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC and have more fun w immensely better IQ.
-

Though if a 5dII is all he has, this would be a good time to move if considering Nikon. If i wasnt already invested in so many Canon mount lenses, I might try the Nikon d800e. Or if I was rich. If I was rich, I would still keep all my Canon gear though. Besides, I am thinking there is a good chance of Canon releasing higher mp, better sensors in the next year or two. Not psychic, just an uneducated guess. Nothing personal Aglet. I have been very impressed with the D800 images, and as you can see, i own other brands of lenses. But am still very satisfied with my Canon gear, and still a fan (not "fanboy").  Come on powerball!

4
Lenses / Re: Canon 100mm macro L or Zeiss 50mm makro?
« on: June 17, 2013, 05:06:27 PM »
I've had the 100L, and currently have the Zeiss 100MP and 50MP.

The 100L got sold when I got the 100MP becasue of the small % of "macro" that I did would not justify keeping the Canon but mostly due to the gorgeous IQ of the Zeiss I prefered the 100MP even if only 1:2 vs 1:1 of the Canon.

However, you are choosing between the 100L and the 50MP which are totally different lenses. If you were already into macro stuff maybe the 100L is more useful in that regard but from what I read you are just going to give it a try.

Under those circumstances I'll keep the 24-105 you already have and get the 50MP: you get the best fast 50mm for Canon (IMO).  Not only you can take your first steps into the macro experience to see how it goes (maybe you do not need more after all) but more importantly you'll have also have a REALLY great versatile lens for astrophoto, nightshoots, indoors, walkaround, portraits, "1:2 macros" etc.  Know as well you can put a cheap extension tube to bring it into 1:1 territory loosing maybe 1 stop (becomes a 50mm 2.8, roughly)

You will then realize if you are REALLY into macro in which case I think neither of the 100L nor 50MP nor 100MP will cut it. From my limited macro experience I think the working distance of those lenses is too close to the subject to shoot bugs outdoors, they will get away before you get close enough. For serious macro you need the Canon 180. Unless you shoot only flowers  :=)


I guess I forgot to mention I will be using these on my 6D. Thanks for all the info so far.

A longer focal length for a macro means you do not have to get so close, this allows the subject to be naturally illuminated without shadows from a lens 2 inches away.  Since the 50mm is not a true macro, it likely does not focus as closely.
Personally, 100mm is the minimum I'd want to use for macro on FF, and longer is better.  If you are taking casual images, the IS of the Canon L really helps, it works far better than I ever expected, I can get close and still not use a tripod and macro head.  Don't overlook some of the other third party macro lenses, there are lots of very good ones.
 
On a crop camera, 50mm might be a good choice, but there again, on a crop body, the Canon 60mm Macro has a lot going for it.

+1. You both stated it better than I.  I have considered longer macro lenses, including Sigma, but dont take enough macros to justify the cost. :)

5
Site Information / Re: CR wobbly
« on: June 17, 2013, 04:42:50 PM »
"I am now prepared to represent the ostriches and protest MY Lord on their behalf about being spoken about in the same topic as those small "multicoloured squirrels". They can't even make up their minds what colour they are whereas we ostriches are only in 1 continent and are all of the same basic colour, besides which we don't have a problem with "nuts" seeing as we don't have any.

That's IT!  I am suing on behalf of all squirrels and ostriches. If you dont have any money, would be willing to settle out of court. Do you own a 1dx,5dlll, 200f2 L, or any of the great white primes version II?  Also, one of my uncles once had some mini-ostriches,(emu) here in the US. Does that count for a 2nd continent?

6
Site Information / Re: CR wobbly
« on: June 17, 2013, 04:32:53 PM »
Had an awesome one today. The page was about the equivalent of five normal pages long and had masses of code in different colours snaking side to side.


Please check your servers to see if there are mushrooms growing in them.

He is not hallucinating. It is only a zombie squirrel attack from somewhere under or over the rainbow.

7
Site Information / Re: banning people for nothing at canon rumors
« on: June 17, 2013, 04:16:10 PM »
Quote from Neruo: "As for 'out of air accusations', how would you feel if, hypothetically, I called you, "Not the brightest bulb?" 

Is this a way to skirt censoring & bans?  Preface all insults with "hypothetically" ?  ;D Just kidding mods. Dont want to be banned for 10 days again, which btw i deserved it imo. :-*

8
Lenses / Re: Canon 100mm macro L or Zeiss 50mm makro?
« on: June 17, 2013, 03:13:17 PM »
I dont have the Zeiss 50/f2 macro, but have the 50/1.4. Also, the Zeiss 100mp.I am not sure why you mention the Zeiss 50mp instead of the Zeiss 100mp, since you are comparing them to the 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro.But anyway, the 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro is a fantastic lens. So are the Zeiss 50 & 100. Just remember that the Zeiss are manual focus only. I understand that the Zeiss 50mp is an excellent lens.  You might end up using manual focus on the 100L if used as macro anyhow. You might want to visit some sites such as flickr, 500px, some Zeiss sites to see examples of images taken with all these lenses. As far as all-round quality, including build, iq, etc they are all excellent. The main differences are manual focus vs auto, and the Canon rendition vs the Zeiss rendition, and cost. I lean more toward the Zeiss look, but they are more expensive, and if you want to use them for other than macro, MF can take some getting used to.

9
Lenses / Re: $1000 .. what to buy
« on: June 17, 2013, 02:48:45 PM »
The 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro is a great all-round lens, especially for macro and IMO for portraits. As far as landscapes, it depends on how much of a wa you want or need. But it is an excellant lens. If you want a range in one lens, then a zoom is your choice.

10
Site Information / Re: banning people for nothing at canon rumors
« on: June 16, 2013, 03:21:34 PM »
One more off off topic comment and then i am quitting for the night: Ausatralia looks like a cool place to visit, but there are too many dangerous critters there for me. Here in the US, we have our killer squirrels, but there you have crocs, snakes, spiders, kangeroos?. Did I leave anything out emi?

It's the redback spiders that scare me, a fatal wee bite on the bum when you are doing your business.
It's not so much the fatal bite, as we've all got to go someway, somehow, as the being found dead on the pan.

Not a pleasant way to go-or to be found!

11
When faced with a difficult decision and not sure what direction to go in, these wise words from the great Yogi Berra come to mind: " When You Come to a Fork in the Road, Take It!"

12
Lenses / Re: What is the next Canon lens you want or covet and why...
« on: June 16, 2013, 04:39:22 AM »
The 200/f2 L. From everything i have seen and heard, it is a wonderful lens. I would probably use it more as a long portrait lens than anything else. Maybe when i win the lottery.

13
Australia / Re: New setup- New to the Forum
« on: June 16, 2013, 04:31:35 AM »
As far as the astrophotograpy is concerned, there are some experienced members on CR, such as noisejammer and some others. Where are you noisejammer & others? My only advice concerns photographing Uranus. Be careful! Oh, sorry. Bad Joke :-[.  Anyway, good luck with your decision!

14
Site Information / Re: banning people for nothing at canon rumors
« on: June 16, 2013, 04:18:15 AM »
"This squirrel thing is cute,.... and I haven't really seen many answers still as to why this person was banned."

Obviously, it was because he didn't like squirrels ;D

The first idea that makes sense. Finally we know the reason. Thank-you.

15
Site Information / Re: banning people for nothing at canon rumors
« on: June 16, 2013, 04:16:07 AM »
And he mentioned "We must know what we are talking about", I mean, everyone knows this thread has lost the Plot, and it's now about Squirrels, and Nut Zippers (sounds exceptionally painful), and who can Post the most bizarre Image of a Squirrel, and Criminals that Live upside down in a place called Downunder.

So pretty sure this might be a winner here, squirrel and a nut zipper all in one image.

Ouch! You seem to be amused at this msmith0807. I can only sympathize (or is it sympathiSe-im confused). Or is it empathize. Whatever, as a male i feel for the squirrel :o :'( :(

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8