July 23, 2014, 08:15:25 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bainsybike

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
1
EOS-M / Re: Need help.. LCD turns on but black!?!
« on: July 21, 2014, 02:38:17 AM »
Have you tried adjusting LCD brightness?

Edit....  Sounds too obvious to mention, but have you fitted a lens, and taken the lens cap off?

2
EOS-M / Re: The promised pics of the 18-200 Tammy
« on: July 20, 2014, 04:16:49 AM »
  The M + 22/2 does decently in low light (not nearly as good as my 1D X + 35/1.4L, though).

With more than 20x price differential, I'd sort of expect that. ;)

3
There's a thread on this already: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=15732.0

Lots of good suggestions.

4
EOS-M / Re: Next official EF-M Lens
« on: July 03, 2014, 02:16:13 AM »
Digging around, there appears to be patent applications for the following Canon branded lenses...

16-120mm f3.5-5.6 - please ! Now !!!
18-200mm f3.5-6.3 - how very Tamron
22-46mm f3.5-5.6 - Presumably pancake, could be tempted ;-)

I agree  - the 16-120 could be a winner and the Tammy has #2 covered but I don't understand he last
one. It is an overlap of the 18-55 kit lens unless there is something I'm missing. Pancake you say ? Pancake zoom?

Yes, maybe something like http://www.dpreview.com/products/olympus/lenses/olympus_m_14-42_3p5-5p6_ez

5
EOS-M / Re: M+22mm for Travel/Street?
« on: July 02, 2014, 02:17:48 AM »
Thanks and would my 70D software work for importing pictures onto my computer from the M (will my current EOS Utility recognize the M) without downloading the software that comes with it?

Yes.  The 70D is a later model than the M, so any Canon software that comes with it (DPP, EOS utility, etc) will work with the M.

6
Lenses / Re: Review: Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS
« on: June 30, 2014, 05:59:22 PM »
Bryan's closing remark echos my thoughts:

No other Canon or Canon-mount ultra-wide angle zoom lens can touch this one.


Far be it from me to argue, but he hasn't tried them all.  EF-M 11-22?


http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-10-22mm-f-3.5-4.5-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

I don't think the EF-S lenses measure up against L Glass, at least in my experience with them.


I did say EF-M 11-22, but you're probably right anyway.  It's just that he hasn't tried it.

7
Lenses / Re: Review: Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS
« on: June 30, 2014, 04:07:06 PM »
Bryan's closing remark echos my thoughts:

No other Canon or Canon-mount ultra-wide angle zoom lens can touch this one.

Far be it from me to argue, but he hasn't tried them all.  EF-M 11-22?

8
EOS-M / Re: Next official EF-M Lens
« on: June 29, 2014, 07:55:14 AM »
The 22mm pancake is a very nice equivalent to 35mm full frame.  I'd like to see it joined by a ~30mm F2, 50mm equivalent.

9
Interesting, especially if the Tamron is available in the USA and the Canon isn't...

10
To answer your second question, Surapon, you won't affect the quality of your original image if you save the reduced image under a different file name.  You will then have two images - the original, which will be intact, and the reduced version, which will be of reduced quality, as others have explained.

And I look forward to seeing some of these images!

11
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: London Walkaround
« on: June 18, 2014, 09:43:00 AM »
Hi bainsybike.
I think you misread what I said, "a car so I could get OUT of London" NOT drive around IN London.  ::) Damn difficult to get to the Devils Punchbowl by train, or the New Forest! Yes I expect that there are railways near these places, but it's not about that it is about changing trains 5 times, spending hours waiting for connections, or plain convenience!  ;D

Cheers Graham.

A car so I could get out of London!

Better to get on a train.  With a car in London, you'll spend most of your time in traffic jams.

That's true, but even driving out of London can take an hour from the centre. That's when the traffic isnt too bad! If hiring a car, its better to oick one up from close to an outer London tube station somewhere.

Just what I was going to say!   ;)

12
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: London Walkaround
« on: June 18, 2014, 07:04:43 AM »
A car so I could get out of London!

Better to get on a train.  With a car in London, you'll spend most of your time in traffic jams.

13
EOS-M / Re: Canon EF-M 55-200 f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Gets Official
« on: June 17, 2014, 07:15:02 AM »
It has appeared on the Canon UK website, so I suppose that means it will be available over here.  :)    No price that I can find though.  And it does look like a plastic mount.  :(

14
So what happens when you print the image?  Do you need curved paper?

15
Another thought on this one.

The magnification factor required to give 100% view on the screen is given by:

    Square root(no. of pixels in image / no. of pixels on screen)

In the case of the M with a full size 3x2 image this works out at about 4.15.

So when we look at an image magnified 10x on the M screen, we're actually viewing it at about 240%.  It may be possible to achieve 100% with the finger spread technique at some intermediate point, but there doesn't seem to be any easy way to know when you get there.

Do the high-end cameras mentioned by Neuro and others give a true 100% view?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8