May 24, 2013, 06:19:32 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - ryllz75

Pages: [1]
1
Lenses / With my 5D MK III is an f/2.8 lens really needed???
« on: November 27, 2012, 04:30:41 PM »
Hi All,

I've been mulling over this since I bought the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II this past weekend. Not sure if its buyers remorse or rookie mistake in not realizing the capabilities of my new 5d MK III.

I currently use a 5d MK III and while using my 24-105L f/4 i noticed that  I can easily shoot dimly lit indoor scene (church wedding, night indoor events, etc.) just by bumping up the ISO to 8000-10000 and the images look very good still!  I have not notice any drastic increases in noise and even so I can get it out using software.  Now I have not tried printing these shots yet BUT even in 100% crop the images looks good.

Is there any merit to this line of thinking that f/4 lenses are good enough to use for dimly lit scnese using the 5d MK III?  Should i exchange the 70-200mm 2.8 IS II with the 70-200 f/4 IS and save the $900 difference and apply that to a 16-35 MK II or the 35 L?  Your opinions/experience would be great on this!  thanks in advance!

2
Lenses / Have $2200 budget which lens(es) to get next?
« on: November 22, 2012, 03:54:55 AM »
Hi All,

Well i've been thinking about this dilemma for a few days and have narrowed it to 3 choices.  Which one would you choose below?

1. Buy the 70-200mm IS MK II  for about $2099 new

2. Buy the 135L used at about $800 in craigslist + a 70-200mm 2.8 non-IS $1299 new

3. Buy the 135L used at about $800 in craigslist + a 70-200mm f/4 IS $1099 new

4. Any other suggestions based on my use below?

Im new to paid photography though been a hobbyist for years.  Recently upgraded to 5D MK III which makes me think that i dont need the 2.8 with IS since i can always bump up the ISO to compensate and i don't do sports photography..  Also interested with the 135L since i have never seen a bad review on it.    I am and will be shooting 80% indoor/outdoor portraits for babies, engagement shoots and fitness models.  I do predict that about 20-30% of my business will be weddings in 2013.  As of now only have 1 wedding book and another on the way for 2013 so mostly portraits/engagement shoots at the moment.

anyways let me know what you think..

Current equipment: 5D MK III, 24-105 f/4 L, 50mm f/1.2 L, 28-75mm f/2.8 Tamron

3
Hi All,

I recently upgraded to a 5D MK III which I will be using for more portrait and engagement sessions work.  I deliberated between the 35L vs the 50L and decided to go with the 50L based on opinions i read here and the IQ and AF when paired with the 5D MK III.

Now I am in need of your expertise and experience on which lens to get next.  As mentioned I am just getting into "paid" portrait shoots (fitness model shoots/headshots and some family and baby shoots) and just booked my first 2 engagement shoots for Jan and Feb and wondering which will be best to use.  I also have the opportunity to shoot 2 weddings in summer 2013 as well which will be my first experience shooting weddings.  1 as a second shooter and 1 as primary.  Im giving the relevant information in order to determine which lens will be good to get in terms of IQ, versatility, etc.  At this point in time i cant afford both having just invested in the 5D MK III and the 50L.  My initial budget getting into this semi pro photography was $5000 and will unfortunately have to exceed it.

So is the 135L better for my current/future needs or will the 70-200mm IS MK II a better choice since it will give me the FL versatility that i may need for future shoots?  Im looking for realworld experience of owners of these lens as I was initially leaning to the 135L and started to think in terms of versatility and started to doubt my decisions. 

Your opinions will be greatly appreciated!  thanks in advance!


BTW just to disclose my only 2 other lenses im using now, I currently have a 24-105L and a 28-75 Tamron 2.8 (i Know not very good lens but cant afford the Canon version at this point.  LOL..)  On my short list after getting one of the lens above (135L or 70-200 2.8L) is I definitely want to get the 16-35 L MK II for the wide group shots during the wedding etc. unless you guys can recommend a better lens maybe a 24L? Not sure here yet.

4
EOS Bodies - For Stills / 5D Mark III - is this a good price?
« on: November 15, 2012, 03:16:22 PM »
Hi All,

I have an opportunity to buy a Brand New Canon 5D Mark III from a canon Authorized Dealer for $2898.  Is this a good price considering its listed everywhere for $3299 right now? $401 discount

or do you guys believe it will go lower than that during the thanksgiving or holiday sales?

Any advice/insight would be greatly appreciated.  This is my first full frame camera and excited to pull the trigger.

thanks

5
Lenses / New Canon 5D Mark III - good price?
« on: November 15, 2012, 02:00:14 PM »
Hi All,

I have an opportunity to buy a Brand New Canon 5D Mark III from a canon Authorized Dealer for $2898.  Is this a good price considering its listed everywhere for $3299 right now? $401 discount

or do you guys believe it will go lower than that during the thanksgiving or holiday sales?

Any advice/insight would be greatly appreciated.  This is my first full frame camera and excited to pull the trigger.

thanks

Pages: [1]