March 03, 2015, 11:45:01 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - boateggs

Pages: [1]
EOS Bodies / Rebates extended?
« on: February 04, 2012, 07:59:42 PM »
Saw this over on slickdeals, I hope it is true.  Some hooligan over there says that the instant rebates will be extended through March 3rd.

EOS Bodies / My 9.8mp 70D dream
« on: February 01, 2012, 06:13:40 PM »
I was explaining some camera stuff to a friend who can compose a picture but doesn't know how to use a camera very well and I had a thought.  Canon's APS-C offerings seem to be very crowded and similar with the differences between them being very small.

My predictions:
The next xxxxD should be a T1i on a diet
The 650D should have some slight improvements but remain mostly the same as the 600D
7D2 will remain 18mp APS-C with some improvements to ISO/noise, slightly improved AF and whatever else the Digic 5 brings (maybe get a BSI sensor as a testbed for making a FF BSI)

The 60D was kinda the stepchild as it was too similar to the 7D and 600D, thus my point:
I want the 70D to get AFMA and have a 9.8mp sensor.  Call me crazy for the reduction in MP, but I have read many places that crop 18mp tests the limits of physics and quality with currently used sensor technology (no first hand experience, just a lot of opinions read).
Why 9.8mp?  After the sensor is cropped to 16:9, 1080p video would have an even 2x2 sensor pixels per video pixel.  This would tickle the HDSLR video peeps.  It would also make many happy who (like myself) dont really want 18mp as much as better ISO/noise performance.  A boost in AF might also be nice improvement.

I don't think that this will actually happen because Canon would be crazy to have sensor design/production for only one niche-ish body that isn't a 1 series, but then again I don't think that they expected the 5D2 to take off as much as it did for video.

What do you think?  Am I crazy or just have a decent "wish" camera?

Lenses / New lenses for me
« on: December 21, 2011, 04:23:02 PM »
Ive been reading here for a while and there is a lot of good advice that I have read, thus I want more!  I know most of you peeps shoot with mostly L glass, so my desires below might be a little low end but as a broke college kid i can only afford so much.  I have and XSi, 18-55 kit lens, nifty fifty (been having a lot of fun with this in low light) and some tamron superzoom that has less contrast than a fog bank.  I will not be a pro, just a someone who likes to shoot stuff and has another 30 years to get the perfect kit together.

Here is the deal, Ive been saving up for a while for a 70-200 f/4L IS, as I convinced myself that I needed it more than oxygen and was going to finally pull the trigger.  Wicked lens I know and sharp like a fox is quick.  Then I thought about how that lens would probably get used roughly 10-20% of the time.  I also want the EF-S 15-85 (I want the expanded range over the 17-55 fast apature for a walk around lens and cant justify the price for a 17-55) and the Sigma 30 f/1.4 or Canon 35 f/2 (an appropriate length on a crop rather than the nifty, and still the low light/DOF that I am having fun playing around with).

I bought a 70-200 f/4L NON-IS at my local camera shop (I have since learned that this shop is less than decent) and returned it a week after because I wasn't happy with the sharpness.  When I returned it, the guy processing the transaction laughed and said that THAT lens has been returned a number of times for the same reason so I am not sure that I want to completely write off the non-IS version.

I also know that I will get a new body within the next 2 years (I want higher than 800 useable ISO and better AF, dont care about higher MP), thinking whatever replaces the 7D or 60D and maybe whatever the low end full frame is out at the time.  With the FF, I know that the 15-85 and Sigma will be incompatible and am not opposed to selling them later down the line.

Here is what I can't decide: get the 70-200 f/4 IS and only have mediocre everything else, or get 2 of the others (70-200 f/4 non-IS, 15-85 or fast-ish prime) and have a more complete/quality range knowing I will probably get the 70-200 IS down the line.

I'm leaning toward the 70-200 non-IS and the Sigma 30 f/1.4.  I know the 15-85 would get more use than the 30 f/1.4 but would not let me learn DOF and low light as much.  I'm also thinking that the 30 f/1.4 would change my mind about the 17-55 or maybe twist my arm into a 24-70L.

I'm just not sure what to get but know that I want more than the kit lens.  Go forth and tell me how to spend my money!

Pages: [1]